Formal Grammar

Also found in: Acronyms, Wikipedia.
The following article is from The Great Soviet Encyclopedia (1979). It might be outdated or ideologically biased.

Grammar, Formal


in linguistics, a logical system or calculation that poses a certain set of (“grammatical”) chains (finite sequences) constructed from symbols of a given finite set called an alphabet or basic (terminal) vocabulary.

In the theory of formal grammar, these chains are interpreted as linguistic objects of various levels (for example, syllables [chains of phones], word forms [chains of morphs], and sentences [chains of word forms]). Introduced into linguistics by the American scholar N. Chomsky, formal grammar represents a means for the strict description of natural languages. Formal grammar theory constitutes an important section of mathematical linguistics, which in turn is subdivided into generative grammar and recognition grammar.

Generative grammar poses a set of (grammatical) chains through the enumeration of the chains together with statements about their structure. Generative grammar can construct any grammatical chain, supplying it with a characteristic of its structure; it must not construct even a single incorrect chain. The best known of the generative grammars are the so-called Chomskian grammars.

Recognition grammar offers a set of (grammatical) chains as a result of their recognition: for any chain produced, the grammar decides whether or not it is grammatical; in the case of an affirmative answer, the grammar makes statements about the structure of the chain. The best known of the recognition grammars are the categorial grammars introduced by K. Ajdukiewicz and Y. Bar-Hillel.


Chomsky, N., and G. Miller. “Vvedenie v formal’nyi analiz est-estvennykh iazykov.” In Kiberneticheskii sbornik, Novaia seriia. vol. 1. Moscow. 1965.
Chomsky, N. “Formal’nye svoistva grammatik.” In Kiberneticheskii sbornik, Novaia seriia, vol. 2. Moscow, 1966.
Bar-Hillel. Y. “Nekotorye novye resul’taty v teoreticheskoi lingvi-stike.” In Matematicheskaia logika i ee primenenie. Moscow, 1965.
Lambek, J. “Matematicheskoe issledovanie struktury predlo-zhenii.” In Matematicheskaia lingvistika. Moscow. 1964.
Gladkii, A. V. Lektsii po matematicheskoi lingvistike dlia studentov NGU. Novosibirsk, 1966.
Gladkii, A. V., and I. A. Mel’chuk. Elementy matematicheskoi lingvistiki. Moscow. 1969. Pages 23–136.


The Great Soviet Encyclopedia, 3rd Edition (1970-1979). © 2010 The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
References in periodicals archive ?
Again we have an effect from phonology that is carried up to formal grammar. The effect of haplology is not medium-specific.
That is, like natural language processing (NLP) in which a formal grammar specifies those sequences of words that form acceptable sentences of the language, we could imagine defining an action grammar that describes the set of all plans to be recognized.
(In this connection, we may draw some perverse comfort from the fact that no substantial evidence exists to document the claim that knowledge of either Aristotelian logic or formal grammar "improves the mind"-i.e., improves writing, speaking, listening, or reading.
Let G = (V, T,P, S) be a formal grammar where V is the non terminal vocabulary, T is the terminal vocabulary, P is the set of the productions, and S is the starting symbol.
Contributing to the recent trend of bringing formal grammar to marginal constructions, Hill shows that vocative phrases do in fact belong to the grammar.
Formal Grammar Instruction: Theoretical Aspects to Contemplate Its Teaching
Abjadiye, or Alphabet, is definitely a tool for beginners for whom the objective is communication, rather than reading or writing: It uses exclusively Latin script and teaches no formal grammar. Of course, Rizk says, "grammar is present all over," but it is "learned by similarities, rather than fundamental rules."
'What big teeth you have, Grammar!' The question of the usefulness of formal grammar teaching in helping children to improve their writing and the form it should take in schools has long been a contentious one.
A brief history of the most recent grammar wars begins with researchers in the 1960s who found that "formal grammar has a negligible or, because it usually displaces some instruction and practice in actual composition, even a harmful effect on the improvement of writing" (qtd.
Two other elements, Formal Grammar Instruction, and the Use of Writing Rubrics were also investigated.
Research suggests that the use of formal grammar instruction in the composition classroom does not help student writers in their proficiency with standard grammatical conventions.

Full browser ?