George Herbert Mead

Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Wikipedia.
Related to George Herbert Mead: Charles Horton Cooley

Mead, George Herbert


Born Feb. 27, 1863, in South Hadley, Mass.; died Apr. 4, 1931, in Chicago, III. American idealist philosopher and social psychologist.

Mead graduated from Harvard University, studied philosophy and psychology in Germany, and in 1894 became a professor at the University of Chicago. A follower of W. James and J. Dewey, Mead belonged, with Dewey, to the Chicago school, which elaborated the principles of pragmatism.

In the spirit of pragmatism, Mead viewed consciousness as the means by which an individual adapts to his environment; he considered the world of objects from the point of view of their importance to the behavior of the individual. The interaction of people in groups, according to Mead, gives rise to a world of artificial object symbols. In the process of socialization the individual masters the meanings of these symbols and with their help learns to direct his actions consciously, weaving them into a broader social act. The development of an individual into a mature personality is characterized by the increased ability to coordinate his own behavior with the actions of his partners and to assume the role allotted to him in the group. The structure of the human “I,” in Mead’s view, reflects the structure of the individual’s interactions in various groups. Society shapes the individual’s self-concept, entering within him, as it were, and guiding his actions along the proper lines. With the emergence of a developed “I” in the individual, the external social control is internalized and becomes self-control, as a result of which a person becomes a responsible individual capable of performing his or her role in the context of symbolic interactions of the group or of society as a whole.

Mead’s social theory influenced the subsequent study of the problems of personality, socialization, and social control and was the basis for the trend in social research called symbolic interactionism. The refusal to analyze the essential content of social interaction has limited the application of Mead’s theory to the study of direct interpsychological contacts, that is, to a sociopsychological approach to social phenomena. Therefore, attempts to present it as a general sociological theory, equally useful in describing interpersonal interaction and global processes, are unfounded.


The Philosophy of the Present. Chicago, 1932.
The Philosophy of the Act. Chicago, 1934.
Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago, 1934.
Movements of Thought in the Nineteenth Century. Chicago, 1950.
The Social Psychology of George Herbert Mead. Edited by A. Strauss. Chicago, 1956.
Selected Writings. New York, 1964.


Kon, I. S., and D. N. Shalin. “D. G. Mid i problema chelovecheskogo la.” Voprosy filosofii, no. 12, 1969.


References in periodicals archive ?
In an effort to better understand the theory of George Herbert Mead, one can assess its use in individual research.
Herbert Blumer e um dos principais autores da Escola de Chicago, responsavel pela continuidade do pensamento dos fundadores, particularmente de George Herbert Mead, de quem foi discipulo, e influenciando alunos notaveis, como Howard Becker e Erving Goffman.
The social psychology of George Herbert Mead (1863-1931) may be seen as an attempt to re-think the presuppositions of successful human interaction.
Chapter 8, "Pragmatism, Rights, and Democracy," makes a case that George Herbert Mead presents the most important pragmatist theory of rights.
Hans Joas, "Einleitung," Das Problem der Intersubjektivitat: Neuere Beitrage zum Werk George Herbert Meads, ed.
Du Bois, and George Herbert Mead, then the ideas of theorists in the traditions of structural functionalism, critical theory, exchange and rational choice theories, symbolic interactionism and dramaturgy, phenomenology, theories of globalization, and other traditions.
After Henry Northrup Castle's accidental death, the letters were collected and edited by George Herbert Mead and his wife Helen Castle Mead.
He has published articles on George Herbert Mead, including "Mead has Never Been Modern: Using Meadian Theory to Extend the Constructionist Study of Technology," Social Epistemology (2005), "George Herbert Mead: An Early Sociologist of Scientific Knowledge," Studies in Symbolic Interaction (2008) and "The Search for Meaning: Revisiting Herbert Blumer's Interpretation of George Herbert Mead," The American Sociologist (2009).
Hegel, Theodor Adorno, George Herbert Mead, John Dewey, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau.
Furthermore, because it brings the canon into the interpretive discussion, I find it to be a useful addition to my library of Herbert Blumer, Charles Horton Cooley, George Herbert Mead, and others.
Como representantes del pragmatismo clasico figuran Charles Peirce con nueve textos (69-220), William James con seis (221-329), John Dewey con siete (331-463) y George Herbert Mead con dos mas breves (465-485).
Gary Calore discusses the concept of time in Dewey and in George Herbert Mead, noting that there is neither "absolute" past, since our conception of what has happened is relative to what is occurring in any given present, nor predictable future, since how potentiality unfolds is dependent on unpredictable interactions with others.