Griswold v. Connecticut | Article about Griswold v. Connecticut by The Free Dictionary
Griswold v. Connecticut
Also found in: Legal
Griswold v. Connecticut, case decided in 1965 by the U.S. Supreme Court, establishing a right to privacyprivacy, right of,
the right to be left alone without unwarranted intrusion by government, media, or other institutions or individuals. While a consensus supporting the right to privacy has emerged (all recently confirmed justices of the Supreme Court have affirmed their belief
..... Click the link for more information. in striking down a Connecticut ban on the sale of contraceptives. The Court, through Justice William O. DouglasDouglas, William Orville,
1898–1980, American jurist, associate justice of the U.S. Supreme Court (1939–75), b. Maine, Minn. He received his law degree from Columbia in 1925 and later was professor of law at Yale.
..... Click the link for more information. , found a "zone of privacy" created by several amendments to the U.S. Constitution guaranteeing against governmental intrusion into the homes and lives of citizens. The Griswold decision was important in later cases, such as Roe v. WadeRoe v. Wade,
case decided in 1973 by the U.S. Supreme Court. Along with Doe v. Bolton, this decision legalized abortion in the first trimester of pregnancy.
..... Click the link for more information. .
References in periodicals archive
The matter went to court, and in 1965 the US Supreme Court handed down an important ruling in the case Griswold v.
Dudziak, Just Say No: Birth Control in the Connecticut Supreme Court Before Griswold v.
The early 1960s saw the introduction of the birth control pill as well as legal decisions such as Griswold v.
In support of his contention that "secular leftists are determined to remake American culture and society in their own warped image, to tear down traditional pillars of America's moral strength," Hynes cites a litany of court cases, legislative acts, and instances of civil disobedience: Griswold v.
Bell in which the Supreme Court decided involuntary sterilization did not violate patients' due process rights, Griswold v.
This reviewer still remembers the day he first learned as an undergraduate student of the 1965 Griswold v.
It started with a 1965 Supreme Court decision, Griswold v.
- Grishin, Evgenii Romanovich
- Grishin, Ivan
- Grishin, Ivan Tikhonovich
- Grishin, Mikhail
- Grishin, Mikhail Mikhailovich
- Grishin, Sergei
- Grishin, Sergei Vladimirovich
- Grishin, Viktor
- Grishin, Viktor Vasilevich
- Grishkiavichius, Piatras
- Grishkiavichius, Piatras Piatrovich
- Grishko, Mikhail
- Grishko, Mikhail Stepanovich
- Grishmanov, Ivan
- Grishmanov, Ivan Aleksandrovich
- Grisi, Giulia
- Grissom, Virgil
- Griswold v. Connecticut
- Griswold, Alfred Whitney
- Griswold, John A.
- Griswold, Matthew
- Griswold, Roger
- Griswold, Rufus Wilmot
- grit chamber
- grit size
- grit trap
- Gritsai, Aleksei
- Gritsai, Aleksei Mikhailovich
- Gritsenko, Nikolai
- Gritsenko, Nikolai Olimpievich
- Gritsevets, Sergei
- Gritsevets, Sergei Ivanovich
- Gritsko Grigorenko
- Griva, žanis