Henri Lefebvre


Also found in: Wikipedia.
The following article is from The Great Soviet Encyclopedia (1979). It might be outdated or ideologically biased.

Lefebvre, Henri

 

Born June 16, 1905, in Hagetmau, Landes. French eclectic philosopher. Doctor of sciences. Professor of sociology at Strasbourg (1961–65) and Nanterre (from 1965).

Lefebvre is the author of a number of works on the history of philosophy (on Descartes, Pascal, Diderot, Nietzsche) and aesthetics (Introduction to Aesthetics, 1948, Russian translation, 1954; Contribution to Aesthetics, 1953). A member of the French Communist Party since 1928, he wrote propagandistic works on dialectical materialism (Dialectical Materialism, 1939; Understanding the Ideas of K. Marx, 1947). Lefebvre later departed from Marxism, defending ideas incompatible with the basic principles of dialectical materialism. In 1958 he was expelled from the French Communist Party for revisionism disguised in pseudo-Marxist terminology and for divergences from the general Communist Party line.

In his main work published after his expulsion from the Communist Party (The Sum and the Remainder, 1959), Lefebvre develops anti-Marxist and anticommunist positions. He rejects the struggle of two camps in philosophy. He views materialist and idealist solutions to the fundamental question of philosophy as merely two equally unprovable and irrefutable “postulates.” Lefebvre also denies the philosophical significance of the materialist dialectic. In his Metaphilosophy (1965), he opposes Marxism-Leninism and rejects scientific philosophy as a teaching about the universal laws of development of nature, society, and thought; he replaces scientific philosophy with his subjectivistic “anthropologism.”

WORKS

Critique de la vie quotidienne. Paris, 1947.
Problèmes actuels du marxisme. Paris, 1958.
Introduction à la modernité. Paris, 1962.
Le Langage et la société. Paris, 1966.
Sociologie de Marx. Paris, 1966.

REFERENCE

Borev, lu. “Protiv revizionizma v esteticheskoi teorii.” Inostrannaia literatura, 1958, no. 4.
Davydov, lu. N. “A. Lefevr i ego ‘kontseptsiia otchuzhdeniia’.” Voprosy filosofi, 1963, no. 1.
Bykhovskii, B. E. “‘Itog i ostatok ili balans renegata.” Voprosy filosofii, 1964, no. 7.
Sève, L. H. “Lefebvre et la dialectique chez Marx.” La Nouvelle Critique, 1958, no. 94.
Sève, L. H. La Différence. [Paris] 1960.

B. E. BYKHOVSKII

The Great Soviet Encyclopedia, 3rd Edition (1970-1979). © 2010 The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Mentioned in ?
References in periodicals archive ?
The four central chapters then investigate the elaborations of the concept in the work of Henri Lefebvre, Roland Barthes, Michel de Certeau, and Georges Perec.
Steeped in theory, and particularly keen in its readings of postcolonial and anti-imperialist scholarship, Marxism, critical studies of whiteness, Chicana feminism, the dialogical methodologies of educational theorist Paulo Freire, and the work of Henri Lefebvre on everyday life and the production of space, the book is avowedly interested in large ideas, and even in raising questions that it can better pose than answer.
Despite the claim made on page 16 that 'the genealogy of place extends well beyond human geography but here we will stick close to the discipline', occasionally the author is forced to step out of geography and mention Henri Lefebvre or Gaston Bachelard.
Cavell's reassessment locates McLuhan as an important precursor to critical cultural geographers like Henri Lefebvre, David Harvey, Geraldine Pratt, and Derek Gregory.
Third, the 734 playgrounds which Aldo van Eyck introduced into Amsterdam, often with such simple and cheap devices as paint, sand and low cost furniture, inculcated children with what Henri Lefebvre called a 'right to the city'.
A similar observation is made by Henri Lefebvre who points out that Foucault talks a lot about space but he never explains "what space it is that he is referring to, nor how it bridges the gap between the theoretical (epistemological) realm and the practical one, between mental and social, between the space of the philosophers and the space of people who deal with material things" (Lefebvre, 1992, p.4).
The answer to this question, according to Henri Lefebvre, lies in a critique of everyday life, that contested place characterized by the mystifications of a hegemonic system and the struggle to overcome them.
As Henri Lefebvre contends, "All 'subjects' are situated in a space in which they must either recognize themselves or lose themselves" (35); that is, becoming a subject involves accepting "a role and a function," which "implies a location, a place in society, a position" (182-83).
For Henri Lefebvre, the ad industry uses images of the past to generate ever-contemporary use values: "The destruction of the past by the massive consumption of works of art, styles and culture...