Los levellers ganaron dicho debate, pero no la revolucion, acontecimiento del que salieron victoriosos sus adversarios Oliver Cromwell (1599-1658) y Henry Ireton
Resistance to Cromwell's successors, Henry Ireton
, Charles Fleetwood and Henry Cromwell would take the form of rear-action guerilla warfare by "tory [irregular]" units under leaders like Hugh MacPhelim O'Byrne and John Fitzpatrick.
Clodagh Tait supplies three linked case studies of the way in which the death of some notorious religious persecutors--Sir William Drury, Henry Ireton
and Sir Charles Coote--were represented as the just vengeance of God by Catholic propagandists, while in a nicely placed piece Kevin Forkan offers an account of the strikingly different manner in which the death and reputation of the last named persecutor was represented by Protestant propagandists.
In 1647 Oliver Cromwell and his ally and son-in-law Henry Ireton
had conducted their own negotiations with him.
Cromwell may have reconquered Ireland, but it was Henry Ireton
who completed the job and implemented the changes, with often equal severity.
Barbara Taft, meanwhile, provides valuable insight into Henry Ireton
, conventionally the villain at Putney for his socially conservative resistance to radical proposals.
His campaign ended with an assault on Clonmel and in May 1650 he returned to England, leaving his son-in-law Henry Ireton
However, Hulme gave his conservative argument an unusual concluding twist, by apparently quoting from Milton and from the Civil War parliamentary general, Henry Ireton
Foremost among these rivals for attention is surely Cromwell's son-in-law Henry Ireton
, and in this new biographical study David Farr emphasises that, for the period between the spring of 1647 and the new year of 1649, "one of the most important influences on Cromwell .
He participated at the battles of Naseby and Langport, fought at the sieges of Bridgwater, Sherborne, Bristol, Colchester, and Worcester, and blockaded Oxford, gaining a level of outspoken prominence that finally put him at odds with Thomas Fairfax, Oliver Cromwell, and Henry Ireton
Without downplaying the importance of subordinate commanders and of the role played by Oliver Cromwell and Henry Ireton
during the debates in the General Council of the Army in 1647-48 and in the purges and decisive political events of 1648-49, Gentles has ably resisted the temptation taken too often by his predecessors to turn Fairfax's army into Cromwell's.
In the second section, Austin Woolrych rehearses his impressive arguments from Soldiers and Statesmen to review what the army thought about the meeting while Barbara Taft presents a reappraisal of Henry Ireton
, Cromwell's son-in-law, arguing that his opposition to greater political representation for those disenfranchised was not as fixed as it has previously been portrayed by his words at Putney.