(redirected from Human prehistory)
Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus.
Related to Human prehistory: prehistoric culture


period of human evolution before writing was invented and records kept. The term was coined by Daniel Wilson in 1851. It is followed by protohistory, the period for which we have some records but must still rely largely on archaeological evidence to provide a coherent account. The study of prehistory is concerned with the activities of a society or culture, not of the individual, and is limited to the material evidence that has survived.
References in periodicals archive ?
Simulations, Genetics, and Human Prehistory Symposium (2005: Cambridge, UK) Ed.
Group selection shaped decision making throughout much of human prehistory, Boehm argues.
For students, volunteer fieldworkers, and archaeological tourists who want to take part in field work, the annual guide lists 224 opportunities from around the world, and ranging in investigation from the early 20th century back to the earliest human prehistory.
1) Given the importance of lithics to earlier human prehistory these make surprisingly few appearances.
Modern chimpanzees in the wild have little interest in dead animals as food and offer little support for a scavenging phase in human prehistory," Stanford says.
The past in perspective; an introduction to human prehistory, 4th ed.
Early human prehistory, according to Mithen, is laid out in chapters 5-9.
Moore asserts that many societies without centralized political systems, including the Cheyenne undergo periodic cultural reorganizations, and he says researchers have no evidence suggesting that recent Yanomamo behavior reflects all or most of human prehistory, or even the Yanomamo of several generations ago.
Archaeology and linguistics reveal very different structural perspectives on human prehistory - we cannot just 'mix them together' to know why human cultures differ, but we can use both independently to draw inferences when they intersect positively.
While purporting to offer significant insights about human prehistory, it completely lacks any detailed archaeological discussion, and absolutely no discussion at all of relevant archaeological data from Island Southeast Asia.
But The illustrated history is very much a reference book about archaeology, anthropology and science, not a synthesis of human prehistory from its beginnings, which creates a coherent, analytical narrative for the whole span of human experience.

Full browser ?