James Ossuary


Also found in: Wikipedia.
Enlarge picture
The discovery of the James ossuary in 2002, seen here on display at the Royal Ontario Museum, has sparked considerable debate. Is the inscription on the limestone box genuine, and does it mean that it contains the bones of Jesus Christ’s brother?AFP/Getty Images.

James Ossuary

(religion, spiritualism, and occult)

On October 21, 2002, the popular scientific journal Biblical Archaeological Review announced the existence of an ancient limestone box described as an ossuary, or burial box, some 50 centimeters by 25 centimeters by 30 centimeters. The ossuary shows an inscription carved on its side in Aramaic that reads: “Ya’akov bar Yosef akhui di Yeshua,” which in translation becomes “James, son of Joseph, brother of Jesus.” If genuine, this box would be the earliest tangible evidence of the existence of Jesus of Nazareth, outside of the biblical narrative. The box also reiterated the questionable nature of the many relics that now exist throughout Christendom which claim to come from the time of Jesus’ ministry, from the Shroud of Turin and Veronica’s Veil to icons supposedly tied to the apostle Luke.

The authenticity of the ossuary was immediately called into question, and as far as possible, preliminary tests were run to support the claims of its proponents. Among the first to pronounce on it, Israeli geologists confirmed that the limestone is from the Jerusalem area and was probably quarried in the first or second century CE. Also, an analysis of the surface of the box suggested theinscription was made soon after the ossuary was fashioned from the rock. The language and style of the inscription are consistent with that of the first century (20 BCE-70ce). Critics have noted the same scholarship that authenticated it could possibly have faked it.

Primary doubts about the ossuary begin with its checkered modern history. Reputedly it was found in a cave near Silwan by an Arab laborer who subsequently sold it to an antique dealer, who in turn sold it to the present owner. There is little information on the site where the ossuary was found, which could ideally be examined independently.

Adding its voice to doubts about the ossuary, on June 18, 2003, the Israeli Antiquities Authority formally announced its opinion that the box was a forgery. Their report emphasized both the findings from their careful examination of the box and the problems of its modern discovery. Rochelle Altman, one scholar who had examined the box, concluded that the part of the key inscription that reads “Jacob (James) son of Joseph” was likely carved in the first century, but that the later part of the inscription, which reads “brother of Joshua (Jesus),” was a later addition, probably from the third or fourth century. Altman noted significant stylistic changes between the two parts of the inscription.

Sources:

Eshe, Esther, Tal Ilan, Dr. Avner Ayalon, and Orna Cohen. Final Report of the Examining Committees for the
Yehoash Inscription and James Ossuary. May 18, 2003. Posted at http://www.bibleinterp.com/articles/Com mittees_report.htm. Accessed April 1, 2007.
Lemaire, André. “Burial Box of James the Brother of Jesus.” Biblical Archaeology Review 28, 6 (November/December 2002): 24–33, 70.
Witherington, Ben. “Bones of Contention: Why I Still Think the James Bone Box Is Likely to Be Authentic.” Christianity Today 47, 10 (October 2003): 42. Posted at http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2003/010/2.42.html. Accessed April 1, 2007.
References in periodicals archive ?
Amnon Rosenfeld, Howard Feldman, and Wolfgang Krumbein provide scientific evidence that strongly supports the authenticity of the inscription on the James Ossuary (i.
The 22 contributions are organized into sections on ossuaries and Jewish burial customs in Judea and Galilee; inscriptions and prosopography; methodologies for investigating DNA and patina evidence; the Talpiot tomb, a "Jesus family," and Mary Magdalene; the James ossuary (thought by some to contain the remains of Jesus's brother); and Talpiot, statistics, the holy sepulcher, and the Apostles.
They also give evidence that the missing ossuary is the famous James ossuary with the carved label: James son of Joseph, brother of Jesus.
Resurrecting the Brother of Jesus: The James Ossuary Controversy and the Quest for Religious Ethics.
Given the strong case for forgery of the James ossuary, have tests been conducted on the inscriptions on the others that purport to link the coffins in question to persons mentioned in the New Testament?
The James ossuary is a pretty good example of that.
Since the discovery of the so-called James Ossuary, interest in James and his letter has grown considerably.
Months ago, Laramie County Community College Professor Mark Elliot and Paul Flesher, director of the Religious Studies Program at the University of Wyoming, discovered that the inscription on the so-called James ossuary is modern writing carved onto an ancient ossuary.
The box in question was the now notorious James ossuary, a bone casket recently brought to light and on exhibit at the Royal Ontario Museum.
First, remember that many trumpeted the supposed James ossuary a couple of years ago as evidence of a historical James the lust and of his brother Jesus (since the inscription there was "James, son of Joseph, brother of Jesus").
Both the book and film and Tabor's dynasty explorations make much of what is called the James ossuary.
The Israeli Antiquities Authority, a government agency, set up the committees to examine the so-called James Ossuary and another ancient tablet with an inscription referring to an ancient king.