Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Legal.
The following article is from The Great Soviet Encyclopedia (1979). It might be outdated or ideologically biased.



in the courts of bourgeois states, nonprofessional judges who participate in criminal—and in some countries, civil—trials. Jurors constitute a body distinct from that of professional judges. In Italy, France, and the Federal Republic of Germany, jurors (lay judges) and learned judges are members of the same tribunals.

As a rule, jurors who sit on criminal cases bring in a verdict on the guilt or innocence of the accused, while jurors in civil cases decide questions of fact. The jury already existed at the time of slaveholding states, but jury trials acquired an important role only in the period of the bourgeois revolutions, when they became a weapon of the bourgeoisie in its struggle against the feudal order. By designating jurors “representatives of the people” in the courts, the bourgeoisie strove to limit, in its own interests, the rights of judges of the Crown and to “fill in gaps in the law with the expansive bourgeois conscience” (K. Marx in K. Marx and F. Engels, Soch., vol. 8, p. 491).

Jurors were always selected or designated according to certain qualifying conditions, that is, from among property owners. In prerevolutionary Russia, for example, after the introduction of juries in 1864, a rather high property qualification was established for jurors. In addition, jurors were tested for loyalty.

In Great Britain, jurors must be no less than 21 years of age; they must be registered voters; and they must either own property that brings in an annual income of no less than £100 or be tenants of houses that bring in incomes of £200 to £300. Candidates for juries in the USA must be no less than 21 years of age; they must have resided in a given county for no less than a year; and they must know the English language. Teachers, physicians, and in some states railroad workers and journalists are barred from jury service.

The Great Soviet Encyclopedia, 3rd Edition (1970-1979). © 2010 The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
References in periodicals archive ?
Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 3-0 that Bredar appropriately asked the jurors not about what they specifically heard but whether their stated neutrality at the start of the trial had been changed by anything they heard outside of the proceeding.
Justice Kimberly Budd's opinion and Chief Justice Ralph Gants' concurrence provide a road map for trial lawyers and judges struggling to separate those jurors who have strong feelings but can nevertheless fairly judge a case, from those whose opinions would cause them difficulty in following the court's instructions or "applying the law."
Ask how potential jurors feel about sexual harassment lawsuits and the people who file them.
Calabria went on to write that even if the statute did implicate the First Amendment, it was still constitutional because it was content-neutral and narrowly tailored to serve a significant government interest in ensuring that jurors remain free of threats or intimidation.
In next week's column, I'll discuss a juror misconduct case whereby jurors conducted legal research on their home computers and also used video editing software to enhance images from a video in evidence.
Jurors must not post comments about the trial on social media even after the trial's finished.
(11) At the hearing, nine of the twelve jurors testified in camera.
It discusses the psychology behind unique cases, such as those of abuse, and cases that remind jurors of past historical events.
Following the mistrial, the Montgomery County judge agreed Wednesday to a petition filed by several media organizations wanting the names of the jurors released.
[USA], Jun 22 (ANI): Two holdouts kept Bill Cosby from being convicted guilty of sexual assault, a juror has revealed.
knowledge they already possess that other jurors would be prohibited