Law of Diminishing Returns


Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Financial, Acronyms, Wikipedia.

Law of Diminishing Returns

 

(in Russian, law of diminishing soil fertility), a reactionary bourgeois theory, according to which each successive investment of capital and labor in land has less effect than the preceding investment, and after a certain limit has been reached, any additional effect becomes impossible.

The “law” of diminishing returns was first formulated by the French economist A. R. J. Turgot in the 18th century and somewhat later by the English economist E. West. West and D. Ricardo tried to use it to explain the tendency for the profit norm to drop and relied on it in substantiating the theory of differential rent. T. R. Malthus also used it to support his theory of population. In the late 19th and early 20th centuries some of the most prominent advocates of the law of diminishing returns were L. Brentano and M. Sering in Germany and S. N. Bulgakov, M. I. Turgan-Baranovskii, P. B. Struve, and P. P. Maslov in Russia. In the first half of the 20th century A. Marshall, J. M. Keynes, J. B. Clark, and others interpreted the law of diminishing returns as a supposedly universal law of diminishing productivity that operates in industry as well as agriculture.

Relying on the law of diminishing returns, bourgeois political economists tried to show that it was impossible to satisfy the food needs of the earth’s growing population or to curtail the increasingly high cost of living, rising unemployment, and spreading poverty in capitalist societies. The scarcity of food products in particular countries was explained by natural biological laws. Advocates of the law of diminishing returns also linked it with the growth in land rent.

K. Marx and V. I. Lenin proved the antiscientific nature of the law of diminishing returns, which others used in an attempt to cover up the socioeconomic factors hindering progress in capitalist agriculture—the monopoly of private land ownership and predatory land management by capitalists in pursuit of maximum profit. Marx called the theory a “superficial notion” (see K. Marx and F. Engels, Soch., 2nd ed., vol. 25, part 2, p. 342), because soil fertility is determined not only by natural conditions but also by the development of science and technology (ibid., p. 330). An invariant state of technology places comparatively narrow limits on additional investments of labor and capital. Lenin emphasized that the argument used by defenders of the law of diminishing returns was “an empty abstraction, which ignores the most important thing—the level of technological development, the state of the productive forces” (Poln. sobr. soch., 5th ed., vol. 5, p. 101).

Scientific and technological progress in agricultural production and the ever greater intensification of agriculture, even with a decrease in agricultural land and population, are accompanied by an increase in production volume, a decrease in expenditures per unit of output produced, a rise in yield (as a result of improved soil tillage, the use of chemicals, and the like), and increased livestock productivity, which proves the groundlessness of the law of diminishing returns. After World War II, with the accelerating scientific and technological revolution and the transition to the machine stage of agricultural production in many countries, the law of diminishing returns has continued to be important in bourgeois political economy as part of the marginal utility theory.

REFERENCES

Lenin, V. I. “Agrarnyi vopros i ’kritiki’ Marksa.” Poln. sobr. soch., 5th ed., vol. 5.
Lenin, V. I. “Marksistskie vzgliady na agrarnyi vopros v Evrope i v Rossii.” Ibid., vol. 7.
Lenin, V. I. “Agrarnaia programma sotsial-demokratii v pervoi russkoi revoliutsii 1905–1907 godov.” Ibid., vol. 16.
O zakone ubyvaiushchei dokhodnosti. Compiled and translated by Ia. A. Mirokhshin. Moscow, 1927.
Ekonomika i organizatsiia sel’skokhoziaistvennogo proizvodstva, 3rd ed. Moscow, 1975. Chapter 6.

V. D. MARTYNOV

References in periodicals archive ?
While the law of diminishing returns influences all markets there are four levels of saturation within the maturity stage (see Chart 2).
Recyclers of industrial and commercial streams, who think as business owners first and foremost, would be quick to explain the law of diminishing returns when chasing secondary commodities: Don't expend a lot of energy and time for a quantity of material that doesn't justify the expense.
Similarly, 1997's Batman & Robin, the last installment in a series that demonstrates the law of diminishing returns better than most economic textbooks could ever hope to, managed to turn away the masses far more effectively than Fredric Wertham's homophobic declamations in Seduction of the Innocent.
After that, the energy begins to fade and the law of diminishing returns sets in.
Over 15 years ago, some companies were using a traditional quality philosophy that there was a law of diminishing returns in quality efforts based on traditional quality costs (ref.
Innovation matters so much because it affords the economy a way of escaping the law of diminishing returns that otherwise would inexorably reduce the punch from simply adding more capital or labor.
Boer shows how to recognize the signs of value destruction and use innovation to overcome the law of diminishing returns. Readers will learn how the management of systematic (market) risk requires different techniques--and provides different opportunities--than the management of unique (private) risk (see "Valuation of Technology Using `Real Options'," RTM, July-August 2000, pp.
Others followed what he calls the law of diminishing returns. Then there were the ones he simply rejected as a matter of prudence--for fear of alarming the building inspector.
In physical resource-intensive "old-economy" industries such as steel, coal, oil, agriculture, or, for that matter, packaged cornflakes, the famous law of diminishing returns is at work.
Secondly, there is massive evidence that science is subjected to the law of diminishing returns, cast in the known rule "first dollars (read: smaller grants) are the most cost-effective."
Possible gains in both areas are limited by the law of diminishing returns. Most insurers that have invested in loss control find at some stage that an additional dollar spent no longer leads to a dollar or more saved.
To the well-known "law of diminishing returns" she opposes the "law of responsive substitution," meaning that people contrive substitutes for resources that have become too expensive.