Linguistic Models

The following article is from The Great Soviet Encyclopedia (1979). It might be outdated or ideologically biased.

Linguistic Models


patterns used in structural linguistics to describe a language and its various aspects (phonology, grammar, lexicon) in order to define more accurately linguistic concepts and their relationships. This helps to clarify the structures underlying the infinite variety of linguistic phenomena; sometimes the structures themselves are called models. Depending on their area of application, linguistic models are divided into phonological, morphological, syntactic, and semantic. In constructing models, the means and methods of mathematical linguistics are used. Any linguistic model establishes such things as the objects corresponding to the data of direct observation, including a large number of sounds, words, and sentences; objects constructed by the linguist (constructs) for descriptive purposes, consisting of sets of categories, markers, and elementary semantic structures whose size and scope have been rigorously limited from the outset.

If the initial material (“input”) of the investigation consists of sounds, words, and sentences, and the result (“output”) consists of categories and semantic structures, the model is called analytical. Such an analytical model is a model of the category of gender, which provides an unambiguous resolution of disputed questions. A word’s grammatical gender may be determined by the form of a word; for example, Russian words ending in -a are usually feminine, but the marker -a is not unambiguous, as shown by the word papa, “daddy,” “pope,” or by meaning (words designating feminine beings belong to the feminine gender, but this marker is likewise not unambiguous, as shown by German das Weib, “woman,” which belongs to the neuter gender).

In the model of gender, each word is taken to have its system of forms (for example, declension of stol “table”: stol, stola, stolu), and it is known which other word forms agree with the given word form (as in etot stol, “this table”: etot stol, etogo stola). Two words, x (stol) and y (kakadu, “cockatoo”), belong to one gender if, for every form x1 of word x and every word form z agreeing with x1, there will be found a form y1 of word y agreeing with z (etot kakadu, etogo kakadu), while the reverse will be true for every form y11 of word y. This model makes it possible not only to resolve disputed questions unambiguously but also to confront the category of gender with the category of part of speech (whereby gender is “inserted” into the part of speech); to establish which categories of other parts of speech are structured isomorphically (analogously) with the gender of the noun (for example, the category of verb agreement); and to compare the category of gender in Russian and other Indo-European languages with the category of grammatical class in, for example, the Bantu languages. Thus, analytical models are employed in language typology.

If the input material consists of categories and elementary semantic structures and the output consists of certain formal constructions, the model is called synthetic or generative (these models are also called generative grammars). A generative model contains a certain hypothesis about a language’s internal structure that is inaccessible to direct observation. The generative model is then tested by comparing a large number of objects deduced from the model with real linguistic facts. This permits the model to be classified and evaluated according to the degree of its correspondence to the facts of the language and according to the degree to which it reveals intuitively felt laws of the language (explanatory power). Since each model describes not a whole language but some one area or even a separate category of it, precise description of a language presupposes the simultaneous use of several models, relating both to the one area (for example, several complementary models of the categories of part of speech, case, and gender) and to different areas.


Apresian, Iu. D. Idei i metody sovremennoi strukturnoi lingvistiki. Moscow, 1966.
Revzin, I.I. Metod modelirovaniia i tipologiia slavianskikh iazykov. Moscow, 1967.
Marcus, S. Teoretiko-mnozhestvennye modeli iazykov. Moscow, 1970. (Translated from English.)
Chomski, N. Aspekty teorii sintaksisa. Moscow, 1972. (Translated from English.)


The Great Soviet Encyclopedia, 3rd Edition (1970-1979). © 2010 The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
References in periodicals archive ?
For review variety of application linguistic models in decision-making, see, for example, [19].
However, we have recently proposed a comparison between two 2-tuple linguistic models and we showed the links between them [27].
Though narratology has often resorted to linguistics for its inspiration regarding concepts and terminology, in recent decades narratological studies of description have not turned to available linguistic models that characterize the text type description or analyze typical subtypes of description in their pragmatics.
His topics include key formalisms for representing information granules and processing mechanisms, information granules of higher type and higher order, the design of information granules, a granular description of data and pattern classification, granular time series, and collaborative and linguistic models of decision making.
A number of linguistic models for poetry retrieval purposes are studied.
20 concentrates more on the linguistic models from classical, medieval, and Renaissance epics that Rococciolo draws on.
A different kind of critique follows, based on the partial treatment of linguistic models of creolization in social theory.
In my view, they all set the foundations for the development of what linguistic historiography now refers to as the Theory of Language Variation and Change, but also for the development of several other linguistic models, probably impressionalistically referred to as functionalist, in the context of which the then outstanding generativist paradigm that identified form and referential meaning gave way to the consideration of the interplay of other types of meanings (social, stylistic) and functions to explain language behaviour, as Hymes pointed out as early as 1970 in the introduction to the first issue of Language in Society.
These results are at odds with published linguistic models for colonisation of the South Wellesley archipelago suggesting initial occupation in the last 1000 years, but are consonant with archaeological evidence for post-4200 BP occupation of islands across northern Australia, particularly in the last 2000 years.