Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Wikipedia.
Related to Livy: Sallust


(Titus Livius) (lĭv`ē), 59 B.C.–A.D. 17, Roman historian, b. Patavium (Padua), probably of noble family. He lived most of his life in Rome. The breadth of his education is apparent in his evident familiarity with the ancient Greek and Latin authors. His life work was the History of Rome from its founding in 753 B.C. The narrative comes to an end with Drusus (9 B.C.). Of the original 142 books of the work (published in sections) 35 are extant (Books I–X, XXI–XLV). There are fragments of some others, and all but two are known through epitomes. Livy's history reflects his admiration for the civilization of early Rome, and his belief that the importance of history was its applicability to contemporary life. As such he was a romantic, and not a scientific, historian. His sources included mainly the writings of previous authors, but he does not evaluate these sources critically. He chose what seemed to him most authentic and credible, and presented it with the enthusiasm of a patriot in the form of annals. Livy's accuracy is often questionable; he ignored certain sources and had little practical knowledge of military affairs or the workings of politics. His reputation and popularity are based on his elegant portraits of historical figures, his vivid depictions of events, his freedom of expression, and his masterly style (developed from Cicero). There are many English translations of Livy's history; the best have been published by Penguin Classics.


See P. G. Walsh, Livy: His Historical Aims and Method (1961); T. A. Dorey, ed., Livy (1971).



(Titus Livius) Born 59 B.C. in Patavium; died there A.D. 17. Roman historian.

Livy lived and worked in Rome and enjoyed the protection of the emperor Augustus. He was the author of the History of Rome From Its Foundation, a year by year account of the entire history of the city, beginning with its legendary founding and going to 9 B.C. Out of the 142 books of his History, 35 have been preserved, covering events up to 293 B.C. and from 218 to 168. The contents of the remaining books are known from short summaries and excerpts made while the books were still extant. Livy did not do research in Roman history; rather he expounded on it, uncritically borrowing material from the Roman annalists and Hellenistic authors and taking back to antiquity features of the Roman state structure of his day. Livy did not conceal his intention of exalting Rome. In his philosophical views, he was close to Stoicism. He explained the course of historical events by changes in the underlying morality of society. In his opinion, the way of life and mores of the ancient Romans contributed to the creation of Roman greatness. His History was written rhetorically, in an expansive, picturesque style, with many emotional speeches attributed to historical figures. Both contemporaries and later generations saw in Livy’s work a model of historical writing. The author himself was considered the “Roman Herodotus.”


Ab urbe condita libri, vols. 1–10. Commentary by W. Weissenborns and H. J. Müller. Berlin, 1880–1911.
In Russian translation:
Rimskaia istoriia ot osnovaniia goroda, 2nd ed., vols. 1–3. Moscow, 1897–1901. (Translated from Latin under the editorship of P. Adrianov.)


Taine, H. Tit Livii, 2nd ed. Moscow, 1900. (Translated from French.) Borneque, H. Tite-Live. Paris, 1933.
Walsh, P. G. Livy. Cambridge, 1961.



Latin name Titus Livius. 59 bc--17 ad, Roman historian; of his history of Rome in 142 books, only 35 survive
References in periodicals archive ?
10) Some recent work has also been undertaken on Livy in particular, exploring his presence in Shakespeare's Macbeth as well as his role in the English querelle des femmes.
But Livy insisted that all debts be honorably paid, and the fastest and most assured way to make money was to hit the road.
The following two episodes in Livy are less ambiguous.
As Lazarus argues, 'By emphasizing this aspect of the power of Fortuna, Livy broadens the range of this concept and increases its literary versatility.
But, as Professor Brian Myers points out in a long, learned article in the latest edition of Atlantic magazine, we should be careful that our culture is not headed the way that Livy predicted.
However, the artists who decorated both Livy's history and the French chronicles interlaced them with similar miniatures, blurring the sense of time and place2 Consider, for instance, the strong compositional similarities between the foundation image of the city of Rome in Livy (Fig.
Will Livy Two's talent as a songwriter or Louise's beautiful artwork save the family from ruin?
Livy has spent many months staying close to home to help with the care of her mother, and her best friend Ruth feels shut out of Livy's life.
The story finishes with young Livy Two discovering, through an old diary, the hopeful girl that her mother once was, and Livy Two's own attempts to cut the bonds of childhood.
Thus, issues like the influential relationship between Sallust's work and Livy's, or the fact that Livy wrote his vast work in the wake of Caesar's assassination and the years of turmoil that followed, are scarcely, if at all, remarked upon, their broader implications certainly not explored.
Romulus is a vehicle for Livy to investigate and expose "contemporary ideologies of Roman self-representation" (138).
So, too, and as has also been observed, there are apparent echoes of this letter in those speeches by mature, maternal, well-born women in Livy and Vergil mentioned above, speeches that we might label Cornelia's "intertextual" daughters.