Tax Rate

(redirected from Marginal tax rates)
Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Legal, Financial.
The following article is from The Great Soviet Encyclopedia (1979). It might be outdated or ideologically biased.

Tax Rate


the amount of tax levied per unit of taxation, for example, per hectare of land or per ruble of income.

The tax rate expresses the norm of tax collection and is set by legislation. Tax rates may be fixed, proportional, progressive, and regressive. Fixed tax rates are established as an absolute sum per unit or object taxed, regardless of the amount of income, and are ordinarily used in taxing small plots of land. In the USSR, fixed rates are applied in collecting the agricultural tax on the private plots of kolkhoz members. Proportional tax rates are set at a definite percentage of income, regardless of the total amount. In the USSR, for example, proportional rates are used to levy an income tax on the income earned by consumer cooperative societies.

Progressive tax rates increase as the amount of taxable income increases. A distinction is made between simple and complex, or sliding, progressions. Under a simple progression, the rate increases with the amount of taxable income and is applied to the total amount of income or total value of the object being taxed. Under a complex progression, the rate increases only for the portion valued in excess of a predetermined preceding step. Progressive rates are used primarily in the levying of income taxes on the populace of the USSR and foreign countries.

Regressive tax rates diminish as the amount of income increases. Regressive taxation is clearly seen in the mechanism of indirect taxes on consumer goods that exists in every capitalist country. Under capitalism, special tax rates are frequently used to give certain advantages to large companies and corporations.


The Great Soviet Encyclopedia, 3rd Edition (1970-1979). © 2010 The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
References in periodicals archive ?
The top marginal tax rate was 70% as recently as 1981, applying to taxable income greater than $215,400 for married couples ($595,032 in today's dollars).
The effect of the income and payroll tax burden may be observed in how effective marginal tax rates move.
The lower corporate income tax rate, lower marginal tax rates on pass-through income, and the switch from 50 percent bonus depreciation to 100 percent expensing for assets with lives of 20 years or less are also important.
One reason typically given for reducing marginal tax rates is because these rates may hurt small business owners.
In addition, the reduction of marginal tax rates on individual income would increase incentives to work and result in 5.3 million full-time equivalent jobs.
However, describing cliff effects using solely marginal tax rates can paint an incomplete picture of the effect.
Progressivity measures are constructed for average and marginal tax rates. Thus, there are four progressivity measures, low and high progressivity based on average tax rates (avtax_progresivty_low and avtax_progresivty_high), and low and high progressivity based on marginal tax rates (margtax_progresivty_low and margtax_progresivty_high).
Myles (2000) and Prescott (2004) argue that the absence of a strong correlation between labor income taxation and income may be due to the improper measures of taxation and especially the marginal tax rates, given that the majority of countries worldwide have been using progressive tax systems.
They found that although marginal tax rates do not affect GDP growth rates, a 1 percent tax cut would raise the level of per capita GDP by between 0.6 and 1.3 percent--creating a parallel shift in a nation's growth path.
"Marginal tax rates are just one among a number of factors that influence the tax benefits of contributing to retirement accounts.
There is, however, a stronger connection between marginal tax rates
Romer and Romer therefore argue that to the extent the changes mattered, it was likely through the incentive effects of changes in marginal tax rates. They analyze the short-run effects of marginal rates by examining the response of reported taxable income, and the long-run effects by studying the behavior of investment.