(redirected from Marginalists)
Also found in: Dictionary.



one of the methodological principles of bourgeois political economy, based on the use of the analysis of marginal values in research on economic laws and categories.

Marginal analysis in economic theory was introduced in the middle of the 19th century by A. Cournot of France and J. von Thuenen and H. Gossen of Germany. Marginalism became widespread in the last quarter of the 19th century, when bourgeois political economists initiated an intensive search for new forms and methods of theoretical analysis and of capitalist apologetics. Marginalism was used after about 1880 by the basic schools in bourgeois political economy, such as the Austrian school and the mathematical school. A thorough substantiation of marginalism was developed by J. B. Clark.

Marginalism views economics as the interaction of individual economies. In marginalism the study of the laws of economic functioning is based on the analysis of the economic behavior of the decision-maker during the production process and in the market. In this analysis quantitative methods can be used. Mathematical analysis is particularly useful in studying the functional connection between factors (for example, the dependence of demand for merchandise on the price, the prices of other goods, and the income of the consumer; the effect of various ratios of input of labor and capital on productivity). It is equally useful in deriving marginal functions (marginal utility, demand elasticity, the marginal productivity of the factors of production). The specific mathematical approach for marginal analysis was developed by the economists of the mathematical school.

The shift from free competition to all-powerful monopolies, and also the growing rate of state-monopoly regulation of the economy, placed before the bourgeois economists a number of practical tasks that could not be implemented by a strict reliance on the subjectivistic understanding of economic processes. Among the tasks were determining the use of economic-mathematical models, analyzing and forecasting market trends, computing the coefficients of the elasticity of demand, and optimalizing production inputs.

The characteristic feature of contemporary marginalists is the departure (although inconsistent) from the orthodox subjectivist interpretation of the economic categories and the enhancement, especially in the works of econometrists, of the role of formal-logical and empiric analysis. Thus, several bourgeois economists and econometrists (H. Schultz, C. Cobb, and P. Douglas) were able to develop mathematical methods of research into some problems of the economy, particularly forecasting and analyzing demand and optimalizing production inputs. A number of provisions and findings of the marginal-school economists had a definite influence on the development of a number of fields of applied mathematics, including theory of games, linear programming, and operations research. The basic marginalistic conceptions, such as marginal utility, marginal rate of replacement, marginal productivity, and marginal capital efficiency, are used in the contemporary bourgeois theories of demand, the firm, prices, and market equilibrium.

Overt attempts to refute the basic principles of Marxist political economy—the labor theory of value and the theory of surplus value—and the overestimation of the possibilities of quantitative analysis of economic theory characterize the methodology of marginalism. These traits of marginalism objectively brought its supporters to a simplified formal understanding of the complex system of social relations, to the creation of abstract models not reflecting reality, and to the formulation and support, with the help of mathematical techniques, interesting as such, of false and antiscientific reasoning. In modern bourgeois political economy, the basic ideas of marginalism (such as free enterprise) are defended by a number of economists (L. von Mises, F. Machlup); some of the marginalist principles and mathematical techniques have been developed and applied to the analysis of the problem of market equilibrium (G. J. Stigler, P. Samuelson, R. Quandt) and have been used by bourgeois econometrists (including A. Wald and J. Duesenberry).


Lenin V. I. “Agrarny vopros i ’kritiki Marksa,’” Poln. sobr. soch. , 5th ed., vol. 5.
Bliumin, I. G. Kritika burzhuaznoi politeconomii, vol. 1. Moscow, 1962.
Seligman, B. Osnovnye techeniia sovremennoi economicheskoi mysli,ch. 3. Moscow, 1968. (Translated from English.)
Mileikovskii, A., S. Nikitin, and R. Entov. “Evolutsiia marzhinalizma: burzhuaznye teorii stoimosti i tseny.” “Voprosy economiki,” 1968, no. 12.
Al’ter, L. B. Burzhuaznaia politicheskaia ekonomiia SShA. Moscow, 1971. Chapter 8.


References in periodicals archive ?
Charles Thomas, one of the founders of the Association of Black Psychologists (ABPsi) and the first editor of the JBP argued that the oppression of people of African descent created social roles that were designed to sustain and maintain oppressive conditions, such as: (1) hybrid or bad niggers; (2) conformists or good Negroes; and (3) marginalists or white middle class Negroes (Thomas, 1974; Karenga, 1992, Jamison, 2008).
Thus, the usage of this language, now an essential part of modern microeconomics, traces back ultimately to a now virtually forgotten German mathematician and economist whose influence worked, ironically enough, through Edgeworth, one of the most cardinal and utilitarian of all of the second generation marginalists, through Rosenstein-Rodan, a man not generally remembered today as an economic theorist, and possibly through Weinberger, who is today almost forgotten to history
But it is not, because the marginalists who inaugurated neoclassical analysis meant something quite different by 'supply and demand'.
125) distinguishes himself from other marginalists by his emphasis on the ordinal ranking of goods.
Chapter 4 shows how the marginalists supply a mathematical version of political economy that "tries to remove the question of morality altogether from economic life," while Veblen depicts "the morality of capitalist social relations" as "submerged in the inexorable flow of evolution" (158).
5) Joseph Stiglitz may be seen as inspired by the pioneer neo-classical marginalists in his concern to legitimate the role of state intervention within the context of a neo-classical policy paradigm (2002 chap 1 and 3 passim).
In some sense, the Prologue to the Tale of Beryn--or at least the Pardoner himself--proposes the kind of libidinal economy later theorized by the nineteenth-century "marginalist" economists critiqued by Goux: rather than calculating value according to the labor taken in production, the marginalists calculated value according to the consumer's subjective desire, and the Prologue here performs a similar operation.
The marginalists realized that an agent acts in the context of his particular, concrete situation, not in the context of general, abstract categories of satisfaction.
Although rational choice liberalism is firmly rooted in the classical theories of Adam Smith, the 19th-century marginalists and proponents of laissez-faire, it was in the immediate post-Second World War decades that rational choice theory was shaped by scholars such as Arrow, Buchanan, Tullock and Riker.
Second-generation marginalists soon realized that those same optimization techniques might be applied to the production function of the individual firm to find the profit-maximizing or cost-minimizing conditions of factor hire.
Among leading candidates we could include: difficulties in solving problems along the path not taken (in the case of value, the search for intrinsic worth and invariable measures had already consumed quite a bit of energy with little results) and higher perceived benefits along the chosen road (surely the marginalists felt they had stumbled across a fundamental, unifying principle).
To this end the marginalists expunged from the discipline some of the key conceptual tools and methods that had traditionally been used in the study of economic processes.