metatheory

(redirected from Meta-theory)
Also found in: Dictionary, Medical.
Related to Meta-theory: Metatheoretical

metatheory

all or any second-order accounts of theories or second-order theories of theories.

Metatheory

 

a theory that analyzes the structure, methods, and properties of some other theory, called the object theory. The term “metatheory” is meaningful only with respect to a given concrete object theory. Thus, the metatheory of logic is called metalogic, and that of mathematics metamathematics. Such terms as “metachemistry” and “metabiology” have a similar meaning (but not “metaphysics”).

In principle, one may speak of the metatheory of any deductive or nondeductive scientific discipline (for example, philosophy in a certain sense plays a metatheoretical role). However, the concept of a metatheory is properly productive only when applied to the deductive sciences, such as mathematics, logic, and the mathematized fragments of the natural and other sciences, for example, linguistics. Furthermore, the actual object of consideration in a metatheory, as a rule, proves not to be some informal scientific theory but its formal analog and explicate— the precise concept of a calculus (formal system). If the theory being investigated in metatheory is informal, it is first subjected to formalization. Thus, the part of metatheory that studies the structure of its own object theory deals with the theory as a formal system; that is, it perceives the elements of that theory as purely formal constructive objects that are devoid of any “content” (meaning), that can be strictly identified with one another (or distinguished from one another), and from which one can construct, using clearly formulated rules of formation, combinations of symbols that are “expressions” (formulas) of the given formal system.

This part of metatheory—known as syntax—also studies the deductive methods of the given object theory. In particular, the concept of a (formal) proof of a given object theory and the more general concept of inference from given premises are defined. Metatheory itself, unlike the object theory, is an informal theory: the nature of the methods of description, inference, and proof used can be stipulated or limited in some special way, and in any case, these methods themselves are intuitively graspable elements of ordinary (natural) language and of the “logic of common sense.” Metatheorems, or “theorems about theorems,” constitute the fundamental content of a metatheory. An example of a syntactic metatheorem is the deduction theorem, which establishes a relation between the concept of deducibility (provability) in a given object theory (for example, in the propositional calculus or the predicate calculus) and the logical operation of implication occurring in the “alphabet” of a given object theory.

Another problem of metatheory is the examination of all possible interpretations of a given formal system. The corresponding part (or aspect) of a metatheory that perceives the object theory as a formalized language is called semantics. An example of a semantic metatheorem is the completeness theorem for the classical propositional calculus, according to which in this calculus the concept of a provable formula (formal theorem) and the concept of a formula that is true under some “natural” interpretation of it coincide.

Many concepts (and the related metatheorems) of metatheory are of “mixed” character: both syntactic and semantic. Such is, for example, the very important concept of consistency, defined both as the nondeducibility in the object theory of a formal contradiction—that is, the conjunction of a given formula and its negation (so-called internal consistency)—and as the “satisfaction” of a given object theory by some natural interpretation (external, or semantic, consistency). That both these concepts coincide in extension is a nontrivial fact of metatheory, a fact that evidently pertains to both the syntax and semantics of a given theory. Gödel’s incompleteness theorem for formal arithmetic (and richer logical-mathematical calculi containing it) and his theorem on the impossibility of proving the consistency of a broad class of calculi using methods formalizable in these calculi are classical examples of metatheorems that relate a number of important syntactic and semantic concepts. The concept of decidability of a formal theory, on the other hand, is purely syntactic, while the concept of completeness is predominantly semantic. Of course, a metatheory itself can be formalized and become the object of study of a given metametatheory.

The concept of “metatheory” was first advanced by D. Hilbert as part of his program of providing foundations of classical mathematics based on methods of proof theory (metamathematics) created by Hilbert’s school. Some very important meta-theoretical results, primarily semantic, were obtained by A. Tarski. In developing the ideas of Tarski and R. Carnap, H. B. Curry referred to metatheory as “epitheory,” reserving the term “metatheory” for somewhat more specialized usage.

REFERENCES

Kleene, S. C. Vvedenie v metamatematiku. Moscow, 1957. Chapters 3–8, 14, 15. (Translated from English.)
Kleene, S. C. Matematicheskaia logika. Moscow, 1973. (Translated from English.)
Church, A. Vvedenie v matematicheskuiu logiku, vol. 1. Moscow, 1960. See Introduction. (Translated from English.)
Curry, H. B. Osnovaniia matematicheskoi logiki. Moscow, 1969. Chapters 2 and 3. (Translated from English.)

IU. A. GASTEV

References in periodicals archive ?
The developmental-contextual career meta-theory (Vondrcek et al., 1986) expanded the aforementioned theoretical contributions by focusing on the person-in-situation development.
With this in mind, I will therefore propose that the following meta-theory or paradigm guideline be employed in skeptics' prior for evaluating scientific theories, which I label [T.sub.C]: Proper scientific theories that describe macroscopic events (i.e.
The literature discusses numerous possible interdisciplinary outcomes: an interdisciplinary interpretation or explanation, conceptualisation, theory or meta-theory, resolution or solution, deeper understanding or illumination, model, metaphor, product, policy, narrative, taxonomy, rule or application.
It is by way of painstaking analysis that is highly detailed and perhaps too finicky for lumpers, who hanker after the broad meta-theory unencumbered by contrary data.
Furthermore, it presents an integrative literature review that provides a meta-theory, hitherto missing, to explain the reasons for which there are endless disputes in the literature about the purpose of HRD.
Skrbina claims that panpsychism is not itself a theory of mind, but a "meta-theory", which holds that, "however one conceives of mind, such mind applies to all things." (p.
"Exemplars of the use of the sense-making methodology (meta-theory and method): In-depth introduction to the sense-making issues of the Electronic Journal of Communication.
Seven popular counseling theories are presented in this book and integrated into a meta-theory utilizing the common denominator of existentialism.
In other words, Negri and Hardt's comments concerning deconstruction are easily dismissed as rhetorical flourish, a kind of theoretical one-upsmanship that functions largely as an ad campaign for the arrival of a new market-maker at the theory store: there's a new meta-theory in town, ready to dominate the theoretical marketplace as deconstruction has, on and off, for the last quarter-century.
However, preliminary research based on the STF and its derivative, the MSCI, is promising and suggests that research derived from this constructivist meta-theory has the potential to address the challenges facing career research in the post-modern era, while not discounting the contribution of the modern era.
Overall, Macfarlane has done an excellent job of synthesizing others' work and using it to evidence his meta-theory. Yet, at the end of the day, his project is ultimately a grand narrative--albeit one that is more modest than those of Adam Smith, Max Weber, and Alex Tocqueville, whom he references, ft is refreshing to see conclusions put forth with a glimmer of reservation, especially in a text by such an accomplished author.
In the two following subsections of this part we shall discuss the contribution of the scholastic tradition to economics, strictly confining our analysis of the respective problems to issues of application of Laudan's meta-theory. Given the specific task of our approach, our primary concern is less a thorough analysis of primary sources than a reconstruction so as to focus exclusively on how scholastic economics succeeded or failed to accomplish its cognitive goals.