Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty

(redirected from NPT)
Also found in: Medical, Legal, Financial, Acronyms, Wikipedia.

Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty


an international treaty drawn up by the UN Committee on Disarmament to limit the number of countries possessing nuclear weapons and the possibility of conflict in which nuclear weapons would be used. The Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty was approved by the UN General Assembly on June 12, 1968, and opened for signature on July 1, 1968, in Moscow, Washington, D.C., and London. It became effective on Mar. 5, 1970, after the ratified documents were submitted for safekeeping by the depository states (the USSR, the USA, and Great Britain) and 40 other countries. By late 1971, 69 states were party to the treaty, and 30 additional states had signed but not ratified it. No term for the validity of the treaty has been set. However, 25 years after it comes into force, a conference of the parties to the treaty will decide by majority vote whether it should be renewed indefinitely or for a specified period. The treaty defines a state possessing nuclear weapons as a state that produced or exploded a nuclear weapon or device before Jan. 1, 1967—that is, the USSR, the USA, Great Britain, France, and China.

The Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty has a preamble and 11 articles. Articles 1 and 2, which define the fundamental obligations of the nuclear and nonnuclear states, are the most important articles of the treaty. Under Article 1, the states possessing nuclear weapons are obligated to refuse to give nonnuclear countries nuclear weapons or control over them and to refrain from helping them to produce or acquire such weapons. Article 2 binds the nonnuclear parties to the treaty to refrain from accepting nuclear weapons from any nuclear country, from producing such weapons, and from trying to obtain another country’s help to obtain or produce nuclear weapons.

Article 3 establishes guarantees for the observance by nonnuclear states of the obligation not to produce their own nuclear weapons, and the fulfillment of this obligation is to be verified by the International Atomic Energy Agency. At the same time, the treaty states that the guarantees for the observance of nonnuclear states’ obligations should not create obstacles to the economic development of these states or to international cooperation in the peaceful use of nuclear energy. Thus, all parties to the treaty are obliged to exchange equipment, materials, and scientific and technological information and to help nonnuclear states to obtain the benefits of any peaceful application of nuclear explosions (par. 3, arts. 3, 4, and 5).

The Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty states that one of its aims is to pave the way for other measures of disarmament (art. 6) and guarantee the right of any group of states to conclude agreements on nuclear-free zones (art. 7). The concluding articles of the treaty (arts. 8-11) define procedures to make the treaty effective, including the right of any state to renounce the treaty, on the condition that it notify all other parties to the treaty and the UN Security Council three months in advance.

A resolution passed on June 19, 1968, by the UN Security Council and identical declarations by the three nuclear powers (the USSR, the USA, and Great Britain), which pledge guarantees for the security of the nonnuclear parties to the treaty, are an important addendum to the treaty. The Security Council resolution states that in case of a nuclear attack on a nonnuclear state or the threat of such an attack, the Security Council and, above all, its permanent members who possess nuclear weapons, must take immediate steps to repel such an aggression, in accordance with the UN Charter. The resolution also reaffirms the right of every state to individual or collective self-defense, as provided for by Article 51 of the UN Charter, until the Security Council takes the appropriate measures to maintain international peace and security. The declarations, which were made by the three powers before the resolution was adopted, point out that any state that commits an aggression using nuclear weapons or that threatens such an aggression must know that its actions will be effectively curbed by measures adopted in conformity with the UN Charter. The declarations also proclaim the intentions of the USSR, the USA, and Great Britain to help any nonnuclear party to the treaty that is the victim of a nuclear attack.


Vedomosti Verkhovnovo Soveta SSSR, 1970, no. 14, p. 118.
References in periodicals archive ?
In relevant remarks in May, Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif in a statement read at the 2015 Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) Review Conference called for a Middle East free from the weapons of mass destruction (WMDs), and urged the international community to exert pressure on Israel to dismantle its nuclear weapons and respect the NPT.
The final stumbling block to consensus on an outcome document illustrates the dysfunction of the NPT.
This raises an issue to the international community, that is, whether non NPT states are in the position to join the NSG.
Israel, also a non-signatory of the NPT, are believed to have nuclear weapons, though they maintain a policy of not officially confirming one way or the other.
He said cuts in deployment were not the same as cuts in stockpiles, adding that Iran and the other 117 non-aligned nations that are parties to the NPT are concerned about security policies of nuclear-weapon and NATO states that allow the use, or threat of use, of atomic weapons.
First proposed by Egypt in 1974, the call for establishing Middle-East NWFZ was adopted unanimously at the 1995 NPT review conference.
Since then, despite the emergence of India and Pakistan as nuclear weapons-armed states and the unprincipled concessions made through the US-India nuclear cooperation deal, the continued outlier status of Israel with its undeclared nuclear weapons possession, and the withdrawal of North Korea from the NPT and its outrageous nuclear weapons testing, the nuclear nonproliferation norm has held firm for the 184 non-nuclear weapons states in the NPT--especially after the 24 November 2013 interim agreement over Iran's nuclear program.
Ultimately, the contributors take the position that the NPT, though developed with the best of intentions, is fundamentally flawed and too weak to serve as an effective deterrent to the proliferation of nuclear weapons.
UAE supports the development of peaceful uses of nuclear energy as a crucial pillar of the NPT framework; we started the construction of its first two nuclear power reactors in 2012 and 2013 respectively.
Nuclear countries have breached their non-proliferation obligations and compromised the credibility of the NPT by assisting the non-NPT members and transferring equipment, materials, and nuclear technology to them, he underlined.
For more information about how to attend the meetings or to contact officers in Huddersfield South NPT contact the NPT on 101 or visit the NPT website at www.
NPT will share this data in Giving USA's publications, including the "Annual Report on Philanthropy," historically released in June.