Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Medical, Wikipedia.



an evolutionary doctrine proposed by A. Weismann in the 1880’s and 1890’s, during the initial period of the formulation of genetic science.

Neo-Darwinism is based on two hypotheses: the continuity of the germ plasm and germ selection. The first hypothesis states that there exists a continuous, potentially “immortal” germ plasm that is modified primarily as a result of the combination of parental germ cells. Germ selection extends the principle of natural selection to hypothetical heriditary units, called determinants, within the germ cells. New life forms arise by virtue of the selection of determinants. It is postulated that the uneven distribution of determinants in the offsprings’ germ cells is suggestive of the determinants’ having emerged from a struggle within the parents’ germ cells. Darwinian natural selection is viewed as a check on unfit forms that arise in the process of germ selection.

Correct in its rejection of the inheritance of acquired traits, neo-Darwinism emphasizes the mosaicism of an organism’s tissues and the independent nature of the occurrence of modifications in individual traits over the course of evolution. Weismann’s ideas on the inertness, conservation, and fragmentation of hereditary matter, and on the role of independent hereditary units in the determination of individual traits were subsequently proved to be fruitful working hypotheses that eventually were developed in the science of modern genetics. However, Weismann’s view, an attempt to both link the findings of the new science of genetics with the older theories of evolution and to supplement Darwin’s idea of natural selection, turned out to be for the most part erroneous.

The term “modern Darwinism,” that is, a synthesis of population genetics and classical Darwinism, is sometimes used interchangeably with “neo-Darwinism.” This is a misuse of terms that is unfortunate and incorrect from a historical point of view.


Wallace, A. R. Darvinizm: Izlozhenie teorii estestvennogo podbora, 2nd ed. Moscow, 1911. (Translated from English.)
Weismann, A. Lektsii po evoliutsionnoi teorii. St. Petersburg, 1918. (Translated from German.)
Shmal’gauzen, I. I. Problemy darvinizma, 2nd ed. Leningrad, 1969.


Mentioned in ?
References in periodicals archive ?
The new EES alternatives to neo-Darwinism are not theistic, but the opening up of evolutionary theory to embrace the fundamental complexity of biological systems may very likely contain pointers to the majesty of God's creation, including the diversity of life on Earth.
Because of that, the YEC position should be explicitly rejected and denounced by all people, especially anyone who wants to be an intellectually and ethically responsible opponent of Darwinism and neo-Darwinism.
In this stellar work, Gould, who died recently, explains 19th-century Darwinism, and the neo-Darwinism that has evolved during the past 50 years or so.
According to a modern version sometimes described as neo-Darwinism, evolution can take place in very small steps, each of which has the system in a state of effective and inheritable operation.
Instead of focussing on these tricky historical and sociological issues, Fukuyama steps sideways in the second half of the book, and provides us with a fascinating but very abstract discussion of the roots of social order, drawing on ideas from sociology, political science, game theory and neo-Darwinism.
But this ultimate unfalsifiability of neo-Darwinism is a built-in weakness of the theory.
It is essential to understand that the radical thrust of Darwin's theory in his own day and of neo-Darwinism in ours is not just that it conflicts with a literal reading of Genesis but that it undermines religious conceptions of design or purpose in nature.
In all these respects, rational choice was immeasurably more attractive to political scientists than neo-Darwinism.
Ever since Alfred Lotka (1922) began writing about energy flows as the basis of natural selection, there has been a thermodynamic paradigm in evolutionary theory that has coexisted with what we now loosely call neo-Darwinism.
The latter is a forum for discussing neo-Darwinism, that dynamic school of biology which includes Richard Dawkins and John Maynard Smith.
It is clear that scientific neo-Darwinism and philosophical inquiry converge when one scrutinizes both the problems of comprehending and the possibility of manipulating the process of biological evolution (including the ongoing evolution of our own species).
As a trait, neo-Darwinism posits rationality optimization as a product of natural selection.