New Criticism


Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Wikipedia.
Related to New Criticism: New Historicism

New Criticism

 

a school of American literary criticism and scholarship.

The New Criticism emerged in the USA during the 1930’s. It was influenced by the English critics I. A. Richards (who applied semantics to literary criticism) and W. Empson (who stressed the layers of meaning in a text), the philosopher T. Hulme, and the poets T. S. Eliot and E. Pound. The New Criticism attacked literature oriented toward social criticism, as well as sociological and Marxist literary scholarship. During the 1940’s and 1950’s the New Criticism monopolized American literary criticism. Since that time it has been going through a crisis.

The theoretical foundations of the New Criticism were formulated in A. Tate’s Reactionary Essays on Poetry and Ideas (1936), C. Brooks’ Modern Poetry and the Tradition (1939), J. C. Ransom’s World’s Body (1938) and The New Criticism (1941), and R. P. Blackmur’s Language as Gesture (1952). The New Criticism considers its principal task to be close reading—that is, the discovery of the specific and at the same time universal meaning of the text, including the significance of metaphors, similes, and the entire system of images.

The New Criticism pays particular attention to deciphering symbolism, which reflects the underlying motives of human behavior (K. Burke, The Philosophy of Literary Form: Studies in Symbolic Action, 1941). It also seeks to reveal the multiplicity of meanings (and the ambivalence) in a poetical work and to interpret style as an indication of a certain frame of mind. A number of the techniques applied by the New Criticism in analyzing texts are productive. However, by regarding a literary work as a closed, self-sufficient linguistic structure (close reading), the New Criticism ignores its sociohistorical genesis and social orientation, as well as the author’s conscious aims and the sociobiographical aspect of his personality.

In France, the New Criticism developed in the late 1950’s. It was influenced primarily by structuralism in anthropology (C. Lévi-Strauss), linguistics (F. de Saussure and R. Jakobson), and semiotics (L. Hjelmslev), in their polemic with the school of cultural history and the aesthetics of existentialism.

In the early 1970’s the New Criticism comprised various trends, such as the Tel quel and Changes groups. The most general principles of French New Criticism were formulated by R. Barthes. It focuses on such problems as the internal structure of works (R. Barthes), narration and plot development (A. J. Greimas and C. Bremond), and the nature of poetic speech (T. Todorov), all of which are related to the development of the new rhetoric (the “M” group). Attempts are being made to apply N. Chomsky’s generative linguistics to the analysis of literary texts (J. Kristeva).

The American and French schools of the New Criticism are regarded by Soviet scholars as varieties of the formalistic method in literary scholarship.

REFERENCES

Weiman, R. “Novaia kritika” i razvitie burzhuaznogo literaturovedeniia. Moscow, 1965. (Translated from German.)
Gilenson, B. A. “Zametki o ‘novoi kritike’.” In Voprosy estetiki, fasc. 8. Moscow, 1968.
Elton, W. A Guide to the New Criticism. Chicago, 1953.
Barthes, R. Critique et vérité. Paris, 1966.
Doubrovsky, S. Pourquoi La Nouvelle Critique: Critique et objectivité. Paris, 1967.

B. A. GILENSON (New Criticism in the USA) and G. K. KOSIKOV

References in periodicals archive ?
Ultimately, Richards's Practical Criticism became, together with Empson's Seven Types, the debating point from which John Crowe Ransom launched his often cited--and less often read--1940 volume The New Criticism.
Powell sets her readings of the works of Betts and McLaurin against the backdrop of the development of creative writing as an academic subject, the influence of New Criticism, and the conservatism of the Agrarians in order to interrogate the individual ways they work to bridge their regional and academic identities.
In recent decades, the postmodern reactions against the dominance of the New Criticism were violent and quick, and by the early 1980s the New Critics were almost universally renounced by the mainstream guild of literary scholars.
Accordingly, Pick moved Renascence in several new directions: he embraced New Criticism as the governing critical paradigm for the journal, and he broadened the journal's focus by gradually incorporating first English and then lesser known Catholic continental writers as subjects for critical review, thereby decreasing the journal's focus on the French Catholic writers who had dominated the annual symposia of the Catholic Renascence Society up to then.
In this connection, Ransom is indispensible to understanding the somewhat elusive intellectual kinship between Agrarianism and the New Criticism.
This expansion of Berger's earlier work in light of his later work is also a highlight of Roland Greene's essay, "Close Reading Transformed: The New Criticism and the World," which rereads Berger's uses of the term "world" in his earlier work as an implicit critique of the notion of an autonomous "aesthetic world" that was so dear to the New Critics.
Washington, Dec 10 (ANI): Despite new criticism from a UN human rights expert against CIA drone attacks, the United States government's covert program using unmanned aerial vehicles to strike at terrorists inside Pakistan is unlikely to stop or be changed.
Leavis, painter and novelist Wyndham Lewis, historian Sigfried Giedion and University of Toronto historian Harold Innis, McLuhan began to apply the analytical techniques of New Criticism to popular culture and then to whole systems of technology.
Synopsis: A new low of 40% of Americans view Pope Benedict XVI favorably amid new criticism about the Roman Catholic Church's handling of child sex abuse by priests.
The sheikh spoke as the case of a girl in the city of Buraidah, in al-Qasim province, marrying a man estimated to be 80 years old, sparked new criticism of Saudi Arabia not having a law banning child marriages.
His defiant comments came as new criticism of his leadership emerged from a former Labour general secretary who accused him of reducing Number 10 to a "shambles".
Grav's brief methodological discussion distinguishes his "formalism-of-sorts" (4) from (a) "much literary criticism in the last few decades," which, he claims, tends "to extract and concentrate on select portions of text in order to divine overall meaning," while he, by contrast, puts the plays, "in their entirety, under a microscope with a focus on close readings" (3); (b) "a belief that the meaning of texts is endlessly indeterminate," against which he claims that "the consideration of a text in its entirety, coupled with intuitive common sense," can yield adequately probable interpretations; and (c) the "narrow tenets of New Criticism.