Nikolai Strakhov

The following article is from The Great Soviet Encyclopedia (1979). It might be outdated or ideologically biased.

Strakhov, Nikolai Mikhailovich


Born Apr. 2 (15), 1900, in the city of Bolkhov, in what is now Orel Oblast; died July 13, 1978, in Moscow. Soviet geologist and geochemist. Academician of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR (1953; corresponding member, 1946).

Strakhov graduated from Moscow University in 1928, and he worked at the Institute of Geology of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR from 1934. He is one of the founders of the modern science of lithology. Continuing the work of N. I. Andrusov and A. D. Arkhangel’skii, Strakhov developed and consistently applied the comparative lithologic method in explaining the processes governing the formation of ancient sedimentary deposits. His research dealt mainly with the genesis of recent deposits in the Black and Caspian seas, in inland lakes (Aral Sea, Lake Balkhash), and in the Pacific, Atlantic, and Indian oceans. He corroborated the idea of the four types of lithogenesis and examined the evolution of these types in the earth’s history. In addition, he developed the theories of diagenesis, halmyrogenesis, and humid ore formation, and he studied pyroschists, salts, iron and manganese ores, and calcareous dolomites.

Strakhov has contributed greatly to the development of the geochemistry of sedimentary rocks. He studied the forms of migration and the laws governing the distribution of Fe, Mn, P, V, and other chemical elements both in rivers, seas, and oceans existing today and in basins of ancient bodies of water. He also established the influence of the physicogeographic interaction of drainage basins and of impounds with outlets on the distribution of elements in processes of sediment formation.

Strakhov was awarded the State Prize of the USSR (1948), the Lenin Prize (1961), three Orders of Lenin, two Orders of the Red Banner of Labor, the A. P. Karpinskii Gold Medal (1967), and various other medals.


Geologicheskoe stroenie i istoriia razvitüa Chernogo moria. Moscow-Leningrad, 1938. (With A. D. Arkhangel’skii.)
Zhekzorudnye fatsii i ikh analogi v istorii Zemli. Moscow, 1947.
Osnovy istoricheskoigeologii, 3rd ed., parts 1–2. Moscow-Leningrad, 1948.
Ocherki geokhimii verkhnepaleozoiskikh otlozhenii gumidnogo tipa. Moscow, 1959. (With E. S. Zalmanzon and M. A. Glagoleva.)
Osnovy teorii litogeneza, vols. 1–3. Moscow, 1960–62.
Tipy litogeneza i ikh evoliutsiia v istorii Zemli. Moscow, 1963.
Geokhimiia osadochnogo margantsevorudnogo protsessa. Moscow, 1968. (With others.)
Razvitie litogeneticheskikh idei v Rossii i SSSR. Moscow, 1971.


“Nikolai Mikhailovich Strakhov.” Moscow, 1957. (AN SSSR: Materialy k biobibliografii uchenykh SSSR: Ser. geologicheskikh nauk, fasc. 12.)
Smirnov, V. I., P. P. Timofeev, and V. N. Kholodov. “Nauchnaia deiatel’nost’ akademika N. M. Strakhova.” In Problemy litologii i geokhimii osadochnykh porod i rud. Moscow, 1975.


The Great Soviet Encyclopedia, 3rd Edition (1970-1979). © 2010 The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
References in periodicals archive ?
There is much evidence of Tolstoy's anxiety over the issue of the novel's cohesion: the journal entry from Sofia Andreyevna quoted above, Tolstoy's correspondence with Nikolai Strakhov, (4) and the author's well-known response to Sergei Rachinski's critique of the lack of cohesion (letter of January 1878, PSS 62: 377), to name a few.
In his contribution "The Slavophile Thinkers and the Polish Question in 1863," Andrzej Walicki discusses the philosophical views of the Slavophiles Nikolai Strakhov, Iurii Samarin, and Ivan Aksakov.
Ilya Vinitsky's essay merely strengthens the impression of eclectic originality with its intriguing discussion of Tolstoy's conception of the soul as a sort of "negative pneumatology." Most astonishing, however, may well be the dialogue between Nikolai Strakhov and Tolstoy that is the centerpiece of Irina Paperno's essay.
In the latter category, Donskov mentions the names of the artists Ilya Repin and Leonid Pasternak, the composers Sergei Taneev and Anton Arensky, the philosophers Nikolai Grot and Pavel Bakunin, the directors Konstantin Stanislavskii and Vladimir Nemirovich-Danchenko, and the literary critics Nikolai Strakhov and Vladimir Stasov, as well as a great number of writers and publishers such as (amongst others) Fet, Turgenev, Gorky, Zinaida Gippius, Nikolai Leskov, and Anna Dostoevskaya.
Especially noteworthy is the monumental edition of Tolstoy's complete correspondence with Nikolai Strakhov, one of the most important documents of Tolstoy's life and thought.
Tolstoy was escorted by Nikolai Strakhov, an old friend of Dostoevsky's, who made no move to introduce them.
Tolstoy i Nikolai Strakhov: A Personal and Literary Dialog/ [TEXT NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII].