Norman Conquest


Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Wikipedia.
Related to Norman Conquest: battle of Hastings

Norman Conquest,

period in English history following the defeat (1066) of King HaroldHarold,
1022?–1066, king of England (1066). The son of Godwin, earl of Wessex, he belonged to the most powerful noble family of England in the reign of Edward the Confessor. Through Godwin's influence Harold was made earl of East Anglia.
..... Click the link for more information.
 of England by William, duke of Normandy, who became William IWilliam I
or William the Conqueror,
1027?–1087, king of England (1066–87). Earnest and resourceful, William was not only one of the greatest of English monarchs but a pivotal figure in European history as well.
..... Click the link for more information.
 of England. The conquest was formerly thought to have brought about broad changes in all phases of English life. More recently historians have stressed the continuity of English law, institutions, and customs, but the subject remains one of controversy. The initial military conquest of England was quick and brutal. The members of the Anglo-Saxon upper class who were not killed in the battle of Hastings were almost all involved in the rebellion from 1068 to 1070 and were either killed or deprived of their lands. Thus a Norman aristocracy was superimposed on the English, and the new elite brought with it Norman feudal customs (see feudalismfeudalism
, form of political and social organization typical of Western Europe from the dissolution of Charlemagne's empire to the rise of the absolute monarchies. The term feudalism is derived from the Latin feodum,
..... Click the link for more information.
), which were reinforced by the need for cohesion and mutual military support among the fairly small group of conquerors. Thus the rebellions among the Norman barons were minor and short-lived, the interests of stability being paramount. To consolidate his position William used the existing Anglo-Saxon administrative system, which functioned as part of a centralized monarchical tradition. It was this tradition, as adapted by the Normans, that gave English feudalism its uniquely cohesive nature. There was little change in the administrative and judicial systems during the Norman period (usually defined as ending with the accession of the Plantagenet Henry II in 1154) and later developments were not in the nature of Norman superimpositions. William I's archbishop of Canterbury, LanfrancLanfranc
, d. 1089, Italian churchman and theologian, archbishop of Canterbury (1070–89), b. Pavia. At first educated in civil law, he turned to theology and became a pupil of Berengar of Tours. After teaching in Avranches, Normandy, he went to Bec (c.
..... Click the link for more information.
, established a separate system of canon law courts, effectively asserted the supremacy of his archdiocese, and brought the English church into closer contact with developments in Europe, particularly with the reforms of Pope Gregory VII. The Norman kings, however, successfully resisted papal encroachment on their control over episcopal appointments. The period saw many churches and castles built, the latter chiefly on the south and east coasts and on the Welsh and Scottish borders (see Norman architectureNorman architecture,
term applied to the buildings erected by the Normans in all lands that fell under their dominion. It is used not only in England and N France, but also in S Italy (Apulia) and in Sicily.
..... Click the link for more information.
). Norman French became the language of the court and upper classes, and of literature, and had great effect on the development of the English languageEnglish language,
member of the West Germanic group of the Germanic subfamily of the Indo-European family of languages (see Germanic languages). Spoken by about 470 million people throughout the world, English is the official language of about 45 nations.
..... Click the link for more information.
.

Bibliography

See D. J. A. Matthew, The Norman Conquest (1966); D. C. Douglas, The Norman Achievement, 1050–1100 (1969); F. M. Stenton, The First Century of English Feudalism, 1066–1166 (2d ed. 1961) and Anglo-Saxon England (3d ed. 1971); J. LePatourel, Feudal Empires: Norman and Plantagenet (1984).

References in periodicals archive ?
Critique: Expertly compiled by Tom Licence (Senior Lecturer in Medieval History and Director of the Centre of East Anglian Studies at the University of East Anglia), "Bury St Edmunds and the Norman Conquest" is an anthology of twelve original and seminal articles exemplifying outstanding scholarship.
Take the Norman Conquest. The Norman Conquest had a huge effect on what became English.
U-TURN: Cameron THREAT: Plane taking off at Heathrow ROCK OF AGES: Church survived the Norman Conquest but could be victim of airport plans WING & A PRAYER: The reverend
In reference to Paul Lay's remarks on Robert Bartlett's recent television series, The Normans ('Brain Box', November 2010), I was surprised by the professor's comments about the Norman settlement in the Celtic nations, especially in his remarks about Ireland, claiming that the Normans never interbred with the native Irish and treated them as barbarians and that therefore the origin of the troubles of today result from the Norman conquest of Ireland.
Most historians and archaeologists had believed hospitals in Britain only dated from after the Norman conquest of 1066.
He examines how the first great national survey, which recorded who owned every piece of land and property in England, which documented the traumatic impact of the Norman Conquest.
Or do 'true white Brummies' have to be descended from soldiers who came over in the Norman Conquest (French, of course?) If we go back too far, we'll be vilifying The Queen because of her German ancestry and the Duke of Edinburgh because he is Greek.
Expertly and dramatically narrated by professional storyteller Jim Weiss, these enthusiastically recommended titles include: In The Reign Of Terror (1882513975, $32.95, 9 hours) set during the French Revolution of 1793; The Cat Of Bubastes (1882513940, $32.95, 6 hours) set in ancient Egypt circa 1250 BC; Wulf The Saxon (1882513959, $32.95, 8 hours) a story set during the Norman Conquest of England in 1066 AD; and The Young Carthaginian (1882-513967, $32.95, 9 hours) which plays out in the confrontations of Hannibal in his war against Rome circa 220 BC.
Above all, in contrast to the nobilities of other regions in Europe, the Sicilian elite proved remarkably diffused and ill-defined from the time of the Norman conquest down to the early fifteenth century.
Anthony Trollope's Barchester Towers (1867) describes the genuine article, the Thornes of Ullathorne, a nineteenth-century gentry family who are unable to reconcile themselves to the Norman conquest of 1066.
However this would mean having to move St Laurence and All Saints Church up to 150 yards from where it was built shortly after the Norman Conquest - probably on the site of an even earlier wooden Saxon church, according to the Daily Telegraph.