Normative Grammar

Grammar, Normative


the systematized exposition of the grammatical rules of a literary language, including rules of word formation, morphology, and syntax. Normative grammar also includes basic information about phonetics and phonology and, sometimes, orthoepy. Normative grammars serve as reference aids that reflect the current grammatical norms of a language and provide reliable information about the correct use of language.

Normative grammar is based on the scientific concept of the linguistic norm as a socially determined and relatively stable phenomenon. In a living language with rich historical traditions, the linguistic norm is, by its very nature, dynamic. Therefore, normative grammar describes not only the correct and stable forms and constructions of a literary language but also their variants, which are the result of historically determined vacillations of the norm. Normative grammar treats variants in different ways. The most established, regular, and stylistically neutral forms are legitimized as correct and recommended. Variants that reflect obsolescent or as yet unestablished usage, as well as variants that perform specific functions (stylistically colored variants), may either be proscribed by normative grammars (if they do not correspond to the grammatical laws of the language) or be restricted in their function in the language.

Normative grammar is based on models of irreproachable literary speech taken from the most authoritative sources. Modern normative grammars combine grammatical systematization and exposition of grammatical rules with a scientific description of the grammatical systems of a language (normative-descriptive grammars). In such grammars, description is used to characterize the whole grammatical system. Rules for the use of variants, with information about unacceptable and stylistically restricted variants, are an integral part of the description. Examples of normative-descriptive grammars include Russian Grammar (vols. 1–2; Moscow, 1952–54) and many grammars of the languages of the peoples of the USSR.


References in periodicals archive ?
This volume is in two parts, the first of which contains contributions addressing manuscripts, inscriptions, and printing, the methodology of textual edition, linguistics, normative grammar, dialectology, and philology.
But there does seem to be a move toward a kind of depurated, fractal rigor, like in Chinese prosody, actually, where one has a complex grid of semantic couplings, aural interlockings, intertextual allusions, and so forth, and the reader moves around and wanders, guided not so much by syntagmatic sequence as by attention to the multiplicity of non-linear textuyres that the excisions of normative grammar afforde.
Whereas the previous novel tweaked normative grammar through a kind of search-and-replace method of verbal substitution (in the voice of its Ukrainian narrator, "difficult" became "rigid," "to bother" became "to spleen"), this one expands the field of experimentation to include manipulations of kerning and spacing, and the insertion of playful graphics and photography into the body of the text.
With its clear and systematic presentation, the Dictionary of Normative Grammar is able to provide a thorough, detailed, and highly informed study of this change in eighteenth-century views on |talking proper', as well as providing a vast body of evidence of potential import for literary, stylistic, as well as linguistic studies in this period.
The author's point of departure seems to be a strong statement: "Jane Austen had no access to the normative grammars of the period" (176).