Oswald Spengler


Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Wikipedia.
Related to Oswald Spengler: Arnold Toynbee

Spengler, Oswald

(spĕng`glər, Ger. ôs`vält shpĕng`glər), 1880–1936, German historian and philosopher. His studies covered many fields, among them mathematics, science, philosophy, history, and art. His major work, The Decline of the West (2 vol., 1918–22; tr. 1926–28), brought him worldwide fame. Spengler maintained that every culture passes a life cycle from youth through maturity and old age to death. Western culture, he believed, had proceeded through this same cycle and had entered the period of decline, from which there was no escape. Spengler upheld the ideal of obedience to the state and supported German hegemony in Europe. His refusal to support Nazi theories of racial superiority led to his ostracism after the Nazis came to power in 1933.

Bibliography

See critical study by H. S. Hughes (1952).

Spengler, Oswald

 

Born May 29, 1880, in Blankenburg in the Hartz Mountains; died May 8, 1936, in Munich. German idealist philosopher, representative of the philosophy of life.

Spengler became famous after the sensational success of his principal work, The Decline of the West (Der Untergang des Abendlandes, vols. 1–2, 1918–22; Russian translation, vol. 1, 1923). During the 1920’s he was a publicist of conservative-nationalist views and was close to fascism; in 1933, however, he rejected a proposal to collaborate with the Nazis. Hitler’s regime boycotted Spengler, but this did not prevent the ideologists of Nazism from widely utilizing Spengler’s ideas, converting them into weapons for their own demagogical purposes.

The philosophy of F. Nietzsche was a decisive influence on Spengler. Spengler proceeds from the concept of organic life, subjected to unlimited expansion. Culture is treated as an organism that, in the first place, possesses the most rigid, thoroughgoing unity, and, in the second place, is individuated from other, similar organisms. This means that there is not, nor can there be, any single culture for all mankind; the idea of unilinear progress is subjected to ridicule.

Spengler enumerates eight cultures: the Egyptian, Indian, Babylonian, Chinese, Apollonian (Greco-Roman), Magian (Byzantine-Arabic), Faustian (Western European), and Mayan; the birth of a Russo-Siberian culture is awaited. Each cultural organism, according to Spengler, has its limits predetermined (approximately 1,000 years), depending on its internal life cycle. In dying, a culture is reborn as a civilization. Civilization as opposed to culture is, on the one hand, the equivalent of the Spenglerian concepts of dead extension, a soulless “intellect,” while, on the other hand, it stands within the context deriving from Nietzsche’s concept of mass society. The transition from culture to civilization is a transition from creativity to barrenness, from emergence to ossification, from heroic deeds to mechanical work; Greco-Roman culture passed into civilization in the period of Hellenism, and Western culture became the civilization of the 19th century. With the onset of civilization, artistic and literary creative work becomes, as it were, unnecessary; hence Spengler proposes that we abandon cultural pretenses and give ourselves over to naked technicism.

While acknowledging the senselessness of imperialistic politicking, Spengler calls for it to be accepted as the “lot” of present and future generations. Spengler’s expository style makes use of well-developed metaphors, but the metaphoric assimilation of words frequently subverts the logic of the concepts.

WORKS

Der Mensch und die Technik: Beitrag zu einer Philosophie des Lebens. Munich, 1931.
Reden und Aufsätze, [3rd ed.]. Munich [1951].
Urfragen: Fragmente aus dem Nachlass. Munich, 1965.
In Russian translation:
Filosofiia budushchego. Ivanovo-Voznesensk, 1922.
Prussachestvo isotsializm. Petrograd, 1922.
Pessimizm li eto? Moscow, 1922.

REFERENCES

Lazarev, V. N. O. Shpengler i ego vzgliady na iskusstvo. Moscow, 1922.
Osval’d Shpengler i zakat Evropy. Moscow, 1922.
Davydov, Iu. N. Iskusstvo i elita. Moscow, 1966. Pages 251–77.
Averintsev, S. “ ’Morfologiia kul’tury’ O. Shpenglera.” Voprosy literatury, 1968, no. 1.
Asmus, V. F. “Marks i burzhuaznyi istorizm.” In his Izbr. filos. trudy, vol. 2. Moscow, 1971.
Hughes, H. S. Oswald Spengler: A Critical Estimate. New York [1962].
Spengler-Studien: Festgabe für M. Schröter zum 85. Geburtstag. Edited by A. M. Koktanek. Munich, 1965.

S. S. AVERINTSEV

Mentioned in ?
References in periodicals archive ?
The most valuable contribution of this study is that Lardas has demonstrated the large influence that Oswald Spengler had on the thinking of all three Beats.
In Germany, Oswald Spengler had recently referred to the farmer as the only "organic man" and called him "eternal, independent of all culture nesting in the cities, [a culture] he antedates and survives.
It was used by Oswald Spengler as well as by Werner Sombart, the widely read critic of capitalism.
Oswald Spengler provides the clearest expression of this view that history is divided into two phases, a period marked by mechanistic rigidity, decay, and ultimate collapse and a phase marked by creative vitality and the full flourishing of the human spirit.
Benz, a professor at the Center for Research on Antisemitism at the Technical University of Berlin, and Pehle, an authority on Nazi Germany, have divided their study into three parts: a general conspectus of the types of resistance (communist, socialist, military, church); an alphabetical listing and cross-referenced description of the various resistance groups; and, a broadly based compilation of biographies of those who may be even remotely considered resisters (including such literary luminaries as Thomas Mann, Ernst Toller, and Oswald Spengler, onetime "Court Philosopher of the Nazi Movement").
But despite this historical linkage, many Western thinkers, like Oswald Spengler (1880-1936), Arnold Toynbee (1889-1975) and Albert Schweitzer (1875-1965), have lamented the fact that spiritual and moral development has not kept pace with material progress.
Ray Lankester, Oswald Spengler, and others, have, in their sub-Nietzschean way, sectarian functions within the European societies they describe that may be integral to but are nevertheless distinct from their colonial and imperialist purposes.
His long view of history--which, following Oswald Spengler and Arnold Toynbee, sees civilizations as caught up in great cycles of rise and decline--lends hope to his realist colleagues.
I had charted out the periods of history of various cultures, following the diagram in the back of a famous book by Oswald Spengler, The Decline of the West (1992).
According to Oswald Spengler, the Greek rejection of zero was a deliberate and inevitable accompaniment of their world view, which - as palpably evidenced in their greatest art form, sculpture - focused on nearby, plainly observable bodies, in and of themselves, without any need of perspective, horizon, infinity, or zero.