Oswald Spengler

Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Wikipedia.
Related to Oswald Spengler: Arnold Toynbee

Spengler, Oswald

(spĕng`glər, Ger. ôs`vält shpĕng`glər), 1880–1936, German historian and philosopher. His studies covered many fields, among them mathematics, science, philosophy, history, and art. His major work, The Decline of the West (2 vol., 1918–22; tr. 1926–28), brought him worldwide fame. Spengler maintained that every culture passes a life cycle from youth through maturity and old age to death. Western culture, he believed, had proceeded through this same cycle and had entered the period of decline, from which there was no escape. Spengler upheld the ideal of obedience to the state and supported German hegemony in Europe. His refusal to support Nazi theories of racial superiority led to his ostracism after the Nazis came to power in 1933.


See critical study by H. S. Hughes (1952).

The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia™ Copyright © 2013, Columbia University Press. Licensed from Columbia University Press. All rights reserved. www.cc.columbia.edu/cu/cup/
The following article is from The Great Soviet Encyclopedia (1979). It might be outdated or ideologically biased.

Spengler, Oswald


Born May 29, 1880, in Blankenburg in the Hartz Mountains; died May 8, 1936, in Munich. German idealist philosopher, representative of the philosophy of life.

Spengler became famous after the sensational success of his principal work, The Decline of the West (Der Untergang des Abendlandes, vols. 1–2, 1918–22; Russian translation, vol. 1, 1923). During the 1920’s he was a publicist of conservative-nationalist views and was close to fascism; in 1933, however, he rejected a proposal to collaborate with the Nazis. Hitler’s regime boycotted Spengler, but this did not prevent the ideologists of Nazism from widely utilizing Spengler’s ideas, converting them into weapons for their own demagogical purposes.

The philosophy of F. Nietzsche was a decisive influence on Spengler. Spengler proceeds from the concept of organic life, subjected to unlimited expansion. Culture is treated as an organism that, in the first place, possesses the most rigid, thoroughgoing unity, and, in the second place, is individuated from other, similar organisms. This means that there is not, nor can there be, any single culture for all mankind; the idea of unilinear progress is subjected to ridicule.

Spengler enumerates eight cultures: the Egyptian, Indian, Babylonian, Chinese, Apollonian (Greco-Roman), Magian (Byzantine-Arabic), Faustian (Western European), and Mayan; the birth of a Russo-Siberian culture is awaited. Each cultural organism, according to Spengler, has its limits predetermined (approximately 1,000 years), depending on its internal life cycle. In dying, a culture is reborn as a civilization. Civilization as opposed to culture is, on the one hand, the equivalent of the Spenglerian concepts of dead extension, a soulless “intellect,” while, on the other hand, it stands within the context deriving from Nietzsche’s concept of mass society. The transition from culture to civilization is a transition from creativity to barrenness, from emergence to ossification, from heroic deeds to mechanical work; Greco-Roman culture passed into civilization in the period of Hellenism, and Western culture became the civilization of the 19th century. With the onset of civilization, artistic and literary creative work becomes, as it were, unnecessary; hence Spengler proposes that we abandon cultural pretenses and give ourselves over to naked technicism.

While acknowledging the senselessness of imperialistic politicking, Spengler calls for it to be accepted as the “lot” of present and future generations. Spengler’s expository style makes use of well-developed metaphors, but the metaphoric assimilation of words frequently subverts the logic of the concepts.


Der Mensch und die Technik: Beitrag zu einer Philosophie des Lebens. Munich, 1931.
Reden und Aufsätze, [3rd ed.]. Munich [1951].
Urfragen: Fragmente aus dem Nachlass. Munich, 1965.
In Russian translation:
Filosofiia budushchego. Ivanovo-Voznesensk, 1922.
Prussachestvo isotsializm. Petrograd, 1922.
Pessimizm li eto? Moscow, 1922.


Lazarev, V. N. O. Shpengler i ego vzgliady na iskusstvo. Moscow, 1922.
Osval’d Shpengler i zakat Evropy. Moscow, 1922.
Davydov, Iu. N. Iskusstvo i elita. Moscow, 1966. Pages 251–77.
Averintsev, S. “ ’Morfologiia kul’tury’ O. Shpenglera.” Voprosy literatury, 1968, no. 1.
Asmus, V. F. “Marks i burzhuaznyi istorizm.” In his Izbr. filos. trudy, vol. 2. Moscow, 1971.
Hughes, H. S. Oswald Spengler: A Critical Estimate. New York [1962].
Spengler-Studien: Festgabe für M. Schröter zum 85. Geburtstag. Edited by A. M. Koktanek. Munich, 1965.


The Great Soviet Encyclopedia, 3rd Edition (1970-1979). © 2010 The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Mentioned in ?
References in periodicals archive ?
But it was Oswald Spengler's dubious honor to have brought all the various epistemological strands together and to articulate the Zeitgeist that brought about the regime that, in turn, eventually enacted the infamous tragedy.
They close with a chapter that revisits and rethinks Oswald Spengler's classic The Decline of the West.
Guter's essay considers Wittgenstein's remarks about modern music in the context of a reading of Oswald Spengler's The Decline of the West and also the discussion about music in Wittgenstein's own time presented in the works of Heinrich Schenker.
(3.) Oswald Spengler, The Decline of the West (New York: Knopf, 1980).
Desdenada tanto por historiadores como por filosofos, La decadencia de Occidente, obra cumbre de Oswald Spengler, sobrevive en el limbo de los caprichos geniales y las logomaquias lucidas.
IN THE DECLINE OF THE WEST (1918-1923), Oswald Spengler predicted that the Western countries would depopulate and decay.
Escobar refers to Oswald Spengler's 1918 essay "The Decline of the West," suggesting that no powerful nation can anticipate an indefinite rise.
In the years before the first war, he shows his three subjects navigating between Cassandras like Oswald Spengler, who "perceived an endemic malaise in European culture and civilization" (37), and Pollyannas, often communists, who expected next-stage progressions in political economy to move away from failed institutions.