(redirected from Payola scandal)
Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Legal.
Related to Payola scandal: Brill Building, Alan Freed
The following article is from The Great Soviet Encyclopedia (1979). It might be outdated or ideologically biased.



in Soviet criminal law, a concept incorporating three types of crimes: accepting a bribe (Criminal Code of the RSFSR, art. 173), giving a bribe (Criminal Code of the RSFSR, art. 174), and acting as an intermediary in bribery (Criminal Code of the RSFSR, art. 1741). Receiving a bribe is defined as the acceptance of any material valuables (objects or money) or the acquisition of any property benefit by an official in person or through intermediaries, in exchange for performing or not performing in the briber’s interest an action that the official must or could perform because of his position. The granting of non-material benefits is not considered a bribe. Among the circumstances legally recognized as aggravating responsibility in accepting a bribe are the responsible position held by the person who accepted the bribe; a previous conviction for bribery; the repeated acceptance of bribes; and extortion of the bribe. Accepting a bribe without aggravating circumstances is punishable by deprivation of freedom for a three- to ten-year term and confiscation of property. When there are aggravating circumstances, taking a bribe is punishable by deprivation of freedom for an eight- to 15-year term, with confiscation of property and with or without exile for two to five years. In cases with particularly aggravating circumstances, accepting a bribe is punishable by death and confiscation of property. Responsibility for taking a bribe is borne only by officials. A nonofficial’s acceptance of a property benefit for unlawful actions—for example, a conductor’s accepting money from a passenger for a ride without a ticket—is regarded as a property loss through deceit or abuse of trust. A person who poses as an official and receives property for actions that he can supposedly perform in the interests of the giver is called to account for fraud.

Giving a bribe is defined as the transfer of material valuables or property benefits to an official for performing (or not performing) in the interests of the briber certain actions that take advantage of an official position. The repeated giving of a bribe or the giving of a bribe by a person previously convicted of bribery are considered aggravating circumstances. The giving of a bribe is punishable by deprivation of freedom for a three- to eight-year term; with aggravating circumstances, for a seven- to 15-year term, with or without confiscation of property and with or without exile from two to five years.

In order to expose bribees—officials who have accepted bribes—Soviet law has established the instances in which bribers are exempt from criminal responsibility. Exemption from responsibility is possible if the»briber was blackmailed by the official or if he voluntarily disclosed this before it became known that a case of bribery was being investigated by state bodies.

Acting as an intermediary in bribery is defined as performing actions aimed at transferring a bribe from one person to another—for example, the direct transfer of an item of bribery, the creation of conditions for such a transfer, and so forth. Acting as an intermediary in bribery is punishable by deprivation of freedom for a two- to eight-year term. When there are aggravating circumstances—for example, when there is a repeating offender or a person who was previously convicted of bribery and used his official position for bribery—acting as an intermediary is punishable by a seven-to 15-year term, with confiscation of property and with or without exile for two to five years. The commission of the above actions in the realm of activity of public organizations is equivalent to instances of bribery by employees in state institutions.

Bribery is a disgraceful vestige of the past; it was widespread in the prerevolutionary Russian state apparatus. V. I. Lenin repeatedly pointed out the necessity for a resolute, hard struggle against bribery. The CPSU and the Soviet government consider the struggle against bribery one of the most important tasks of Soviet agencies fighting against crime.

Bribery is widespread on an enormous scale in contemporary bourgeois states, especially the USA.


The Great Soviet Encyclopedia, 3rd Edition (1970-1979). © 2010 The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.


See also Blackmail.
Black Sox Scandal
star white Sox players sold out to gamblers (1919). [Am. Sports: Turkin, 478]
Frollo, Claude
offers to save Esmeralda if she will be his. [Fr. Lit.: The Hunchback of Notre Dame]
Joel and Abiah
intent on gain, pervert justice as Israel judges. [O.T.: I Samuel 8:2–3]
Judas Iscariot
betrays Jesus for a bribe of thirty pieces of silver. [N.T.: Matthew 26:15]
Maltese Falcon, The
though he rejects large bribe, detective becomes involved in crime. [Am. Lit.: The Maltese Falcon, Magill I, 551–553]
pays off Assyrian king to avoid Israel. [O.T.: II Kings 15:20]
mess of pottage
hungry Esau sells birthright for broth. [O.T.: Genesis 25:29–34]
suborned to render false prophecy to Nehemiah. [O.T.: Nehemiah 6:10–14]
Tweed Ring
bribery is their essential method for corrupting officials (1860–1871). [Am. Hist.: Jameson, 511]
Allusions—Cultural, Literary, Biblical, and Historical: A Thematic Dictionary. Copyright 2008 The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
References in periodicals archive ?
(54) The Commission, perhaps still fresh from the stinging criticisms it received after the payola scandals, took a decisive step to require greater disclosure from broadcasters--something it had seemed unwilling to do before.
(286) The outrage registered when the payola scandal came to
payola scandals. The following Part shows how Congress, in crafting the
identification rules in the years before the payola scandals stemmed
(Dannen acknowledged his considerable debt to Knoedelseder in Hit Men's notes.) Hit Men detailed the payola scandals that erupted around CBS (now Sony) Records and The Network, a small group of independent record promoters who at the peak of their influence in the 1980s virtually controlled which songs got onto the airwaves and which didn't.
Of course there had to come from such rampant growth some sort of backlash, and it came in the unpleasant form of the "payola scandals" that eventually left a bitter aftertaste for many persons both inside and outside the music business.
A Congress investigation into the `pop payola scandals' of the time investigated him as one of the exploited artists.