i.e., the Reissner-Nordstrom metric on [M.sub.[mu]], 1 [less than or equal to] [mu] [less than or equal to] m.
Applying Theorem 3.1, we discuss the Schwarzschild and Reissner-Nordstrom metrics following.
These notions enable us to explain the geometrical structures in combinatorial gravitational fields, for example, the Schwarzschild or Reissner-Nordstrom metrics.
In this case, we know the combinatorial Schwarzschild metrics and combinatorial Reissner-Nordstrom metrics in Section 3, for example, if [t.sub.[mu]] = t, [r.sub.[mu]] = r and [[phi].sub.[mu]] = [phi], the combinatorial Schwarzschild metric is
I found a new misinterpretations of the Reissner-Nordstrom metric (Weinberg 1972, Wald 1984) that Will failed to reconcile with m = E/[c.sup.2].
INVALID INTERPRETATION OF THE REISSNER-NORDSTROM METRIC
This has been explicitly manifested by the Reissner-Nordstrom metric (Weinberg 1972, Wald 1984),
ANOTHER MISINTERPRETATION OF THE REISSNER-NORDSTROM METRIC
The classical solution of this problem, the so-called Reissner-Nordstrom metric, involves mathematical errors which distort the relationship between gravitational and electric field.
We note finally that the derivation of the Reissner-Nordstrom metric contains topological errors and moreover identifies erroneously the fundamental function g([rho]) with a radial coordinate.