Rentier State

Also found in: Wikipedia.

Rentier State


an imperialist usurer state that enriches itself by exporting capital to other states, primarily those that are economically underdeveloped and dependent. The financial oligarchy of the rentier state appropriates a considerable portion of the national income of debtor states in the form of profits (interest and dividends) from direct capital investments, coercive loans, insurance, transport, and other services that it provides to these countries. The enrichment of the financial oligarchy of the rentier state at the expense of the peoples of other countries is one of the causes of the intensification of the contradictions of monopoly capitalism. The capitalized surplus value that monopolists of rentier states obtain in their own countries is used by them to extract huge profits in the debtor states; this surplus value is also a means of appropriating the result of the unpaid labor of the workers of these countries. “The rentier state is a state of parasitic, decaying capitalism” (V. I. Lenin, Poln. sobr. soch., 5th ed., vol. 27, p. 399).

Before World War I (1914–18) the major rentier states were Great Britain, France, and Germany. After World War II (1939–45) the USA became the main international exploiter and chief rentier state. At the end of the 1960’s the USA’s capital investments abroad exceeded the total foreign investments of all other imperialist states. Great Britain and France continue to be rentier states, as do Belgium, Ireland, the Netherlands, Portugal, Switzerland, and Sweden. The Federal Republic of Germany and Italy are in the process of becoming rentier states.

The further deepening of the general crisis of capitalism, the downfall of the imperialist colonial system, and the transformation of the world socialist system into a decisive factor in social development have led to the weakening of the positions and influence of rentier states because the territorial sphere for the application of capital has narrowed. First, the rentier states lost part of their foreign capital as a result of the nationalization of foreign property in socialist countries. Second, the opportunity for new capital investments disappeared in the countries that broke away from the world capitalist system. Third, because of the growth and success of the world socialist system, the rentier states lost their monopoly in advancing loans to economically underdeveloped countries. Under these new conditions rentier states are being forced to reject methods of direct robbery of economically underdeveloped countries and to make certain concessions, such as the lowering of interest rates when advancing loans and agreements to impose partial limitations on the export of profit. In their efforts to keep these countries within the sphere of imperialist exploitation and to consolidate their unequal position in terms of the international capitalist division of labor, rentier states are employing a more subtle form of colonialism. Bourgeois economists attempt to characterize the relations between rentier states and debtor states as relations of equal cooperation. In reality, however, the rentier states obtain much greater return from these countries than they invest in them. For example, the USA’s foreign investments between 1950 and 1967 amounted to $11 billion, while the transfer of interest and dividends totaled $18 billion.

After World War II there was a significant increase in the capital investments of rentier states in developed capitalist countries. The primary incentive for this type of capital investment is also the pursuit of profit. Along with economic reasons, political motives also play an important role in the export of capital, especially when it is exported by the state. Thus, after World War II the USA advanced huge loans to its allies in various military-political blocs in order to strengthen these blocs and increase American influence in them.


Lenin. V. I. “Imperializm Kak Vysshaia stadiia Kapitalizma.” Poln. sobr. soch., 5th ed., vol. 27. Pages 396–406.


References in periodicals archive ?
Simply, a quantitative easing-based model is something like a globally practiced artificial rentier state, the type of which we are familiar with in oil-rich Arab economies.
Many states in the Middle East and Africa resisted the forces of democratic change because of the dominance of the Rentier state economic system.
The session included two working papers on the Rentier State, labour market, development discourse and the relationship between economic activity and the demand for labour in the Sultanate.
Yemen operates as a rentier state with a web of elites at the top.
Also discussed in part two is: The Rentier State Theory: A Critical Realist Assessment This provides the reader with a very critical approach in looking at the resilience of Arab monarchies in the Middle East.
In Jordan, we need to transform the current rentier state status that cannot be maintained anymore into a fully-functioning productive state.
Today, there is broad consensus that many developing countries must get out of the trap of commodities and of the rentier state model (whereby a state gets all or most of its national revenues from the renting of local resources to foreign customers) through a major economic transformation.
We knew that Pakistan was a geopolitical rentier state because of its position between Afghanistan (of American interest) and India (of Chinese interest).
The Iraqi scene is witnessing the worst manifestations of the rentier state.
The contradictions of the rentier state soon provoked the anti-thesis: rentier capitalism: (13) a hybrid phenomenon between rentierism and state as capitalist model.
Section I presents the introduction to the paper while section II reexamines the theory of the rentier state.
Their methods include ruthlessly suppressing dissent, inciting ethnic divisions and fears of external threats and making implicit bargains with neighboring states and domestic elites over the spoils available to a rentier state.