Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Wikipedia.


[‚self ‚ȯr·gə·nə′zā·shən]
The capability of a system to spontaneously generate a well-defined supramolecular entity by self-assembling from components in a given set of conditions.
McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Scientific & Technical Terms, 6E, Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
The following article is from The Great Soviet Encyclopedia (1979). It might be outdated or ideologically biased.



a process during which the organization of a complex dynamic system is created, reproduced, or improved. Self-organization processes can occur only in systems that have a high level of complexity and a large number of elements; the relations between the elements must be of a probabilistic rather than a rigid nature. The properties of self-organization are exhibited by such diverse systems as a living cell, an organism, a biological population, a biocenosis, and a human community. The processes of self-organization involve the reorganization of existing relations between elements of the system and the formation of new relations. It is characteristic of self-organization processes that such processes are goal-oriented but, at the same time, natural and spontaneous. These processes may occur when the system interacts with the environment, but they are to some degree autonomous and are relatively independent of the environment.

Three types of processes of self-organization are distinguished. The first type is the self-generation of organization, that is, the emergence of a new, integral system with its own specific regularities from some aggregation of integral objects of a given level. An example is the genesis of multicellular organisms from unicellular ones. The second type comprises processes by which a system maintains a certain level of organization when changes occur in the external and internal conditions under which the system functions. The chief object of study here is homeostatic mechanisms (see HOMEOSTASIS), in particular, mechanisms whose operation is based on the negative-feedback principle. The third type involves the improvement and self-development of systems that are able to accumulate and make use of experience.

The problems of self-organization were first subjected to special investigation in cybernetics. The term “self-organizing system” was introduced by the English cyberneticist W. R. Ashby in 1947. Extensive study of self-organization began in the late 1950’s for the purpose of discovering new principles permitting the construction of equipment with a high level of reliability and the designing of computers capable of modeling various aspects of human mental activity. The investigation of the problems of self-organization has become one of the chief ways in which the ideas and methods of cybernetics, information theory, and systems theory enter biological and social knowledge.


Braines, S. N., and A. V. Napalkov. “Nekotorye voprosy teorii samoor-ganizuiushchikhsia sistem.” Voprosyfilosofii, 1959, no. 6.
Samoorganizuiushchiesia sistemy. Moscow, 1964. (Translated from English.)
Printsipy samoorganizatsii. Moscow, 1966. (Translated from English.)
Kremianskii, V. I. Strukturnye urovni zhivoi materii. Moscow, 1969.
Prigozhin, A. I. Sotsiologicheskie aspekty upravleniia. Moscow, 1974.
Self-organizing Systems. Washington, 1962.
Form by, J. An Introduction to the Mathematical Formulation of Self-organizing Systems. London, 1965.


The Great Soviet Encyclopedia, 3rd Edition (1970-1979). © 2010 The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
References in periodicals archive ?
But it is the nutrient of self-organization. As one utility chief executive aptly put it: "In our organization, information has gone from being the currency of exchange - we traded it for power and status - to being the medium of our organization.
The code is not broken until a decade later in Kyoto, where the two are reunited and witness a diagram of an ancient Vietnamese artifact, a bronze drum dubbed the "Moon of Hoa Binh." Although the mystery revolves around espionage, the drum's real significance seems to be in confirming Dillon's theories linking self-organization with ancient animism.
With less success Krugman uses models of self-organization in an attempt to explain other economic behavior over time.
(147-48) This simple dissipative structure displays three key aspects of self-organization: First, it has a pattern of organization that requires us to take into account all of the relationships in order to define the system as an integrated whole; second, its structure is the "physical realization of the pattern of organization in space and time"; and third, an organizing activity is essential to realizing this pattern of organization.(3) To understand dissipative systems, we must consider many interacting elements, the processes in which they are involved, and the "internal" time, or system time, that such processes highlight.
Rather than focusing upon universal principles, utilitarian considerations, aspects of autonomous choice, or virtuous character, participative self-organization foregrounds the primacy of relation and interaction--an important condition for responsibility.
During the workshop, substantial discussion focused on the definition of self-organization and when it operates.
188) which provided the necessary foundation for self-organization. Drawing on their experiences in the South, Cleveland's African-American migrants started their own churches and fraternal organizations, and developed their own social clubs.
Self-organization is a process by which a system that is behaving chaotically creates its own structure through feedback loops among its contributing elements (e.g.
Third, recent trends in the Western democracies reveal that even the most entrenched habits of self-organization and participation are subject to erosion and may lead to crises in the practice of democracy.
Self-organization will free employees to act like bosses.
The author restricts his study to the years 1934-37 and covers the following in four massive chapters: (1) the beginnings of the independent organization of the Confessing Church (June, 1933-October, 1934); (2) the different organizational structures of and relations between the official Reichschurch in Prussia (EKdAPU) and the Confessing Church, and the latter's legal struggle for legitimacy until the spring of 1935; (3) changes in the self-organization of the Confessing Church resulting from the state's intervention, by instituting the "state legal aid" (staatliche Rechtshilfe) between the spring of 1935 and the spring of 1937; and (4) conflicts surrounding theological education and the creation of alternative and independent theological seminaries.
All cultural systems tend to gravitate toward a level of self-organization. Schools can help young adolescents evolve by promoting this more natural method of organization.

Full browser ?