Social Darwinism


Also found in: Dictionary, Wikipedia.
Related to Social Darwinism: Herbert Spencer, Social Gospel

Social Darwinism

a term for social theories that apply Darwinian principles of NATURAL SELECTION to societies (see also DARWIN). The best-known proponents of this position were SPENCER (1820-1903) in the UK, and W. G. Sumner (1840-1910) in the US, both of whom argued forcefully that society should be viewed as if it were an adaptive organism (see SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST). It is important to distinguish this from more generally evolutionist social perspectives which may not share the hard FUNCTIONALISM inherent in this approach, but simply a belief in some kind of directed social transformation (see EVOLUTIONARY SOCIOLOGY, SOCIOCULTURAL EVOLUTIONISM). The term is now almost always used pejoratively by social theorists who object to the importation of the biological analogy into the study of human social life. It is also regarded as politically problematic, since, if individuals and societies are subject to the survival of the fittest, then the status quo is always seen as justifiable. Social Darwinist ideas are now sometimes presented as SOCIOBIOLOGY.

Social Darwinism

 

an ideological current in bourgeois social thought in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, characterized by reduction of the laws of development of human society to the laws of biological evolution and by the assertion that natural selection, struggle for life, and survival of the fittest are the decisive factors in the life of society.

Social Darwinism traces its earliest origins back to T. Malthus and its immediate origins to H. Spencer. It is marked by extreme diversity. Its adherents include those who advocate social inequality, such as the American sociologist W. Sumner, and those who oppose social inequality, such as the Italian sociologists M. Vaccaro and E. Ferri. They include bourgeois reformers, such as the American sociologist A. Small, and conservative proponents of the need for spontaneous social development, such as Spencer and Sumner. Some of the most reactionary varieties of Social Darwinism are closely associated with racism, as is the case, for example, with L. Woltmann of Germany and G. Vacher de Lapouge of France. Others are linked with the psychological school in sociology, for example, Small, the English sociologist W. Bagehot, and the Austrian sociologist G. Ratzenhofer.

Social Darwinism biologized the social processes in various ways. The German sociologists W. Schallmayer and G. Mazat drew their conceptions directly from the principles of biological evolution. Other Social Darwinists, such as Vaccaro, attempted to demonstrate the differences between the struggle for existence among animals, on the one hand, and the struggle for existence among men, on the other. Finally, still others, such as the Austrian sociologist and legal scholar L. Gumplowicz, reduced social processes to biological processes by emphasizing the primacy of the social conflicts that arise as humans satisfy their needs and strive for dominance.

Social Darwinism provided a certain substantiation to the link between biological and social processes and, in contrast to theories that viewed society as a harmonious whole, emphasized the conflictual and contradictory character of social development. Some Social Darwinists investigated certain aspects of life in primitive societies and the role of social norms and customs in the regulation of human behavior. However, the fundamental principles of Social Darwinism are untenable. Social Darwinism’s main theoretical failings are its naturalistic explanation of social phenomena, its denial of specificity to social phenomena, and, thus, its reductionism, that is, its reduction of social laws to biological laws. The Social Darwinists’ vulgar interpretation of evolutionary theory leads them to a simplistic and distorted approach to social conflict, which they regard as “natural,” eternal, and unavoidable, and whose role they examine apart from its connection with antagonistic social relations. The most reactionary variants of Social Darwinism have been used as ideological justification for the class rule of the bourgeoisie and for militarism and expansionism in foreign policy.

REFERENCES

Engels, F. Anti-Dühring. In K. Marx and F. Engels, Soch., 2nd ed., vol. 20.
Darvinizm imarksizm. Kharkov, 1923.
Kon, I. S. Pozitivizm v sotsiologii. Leningrad, 1964.
Hofstadter, R. Social Darwinism in American Thought, rev. ed. New York, 1959.
Rogers, J. “Darwinism and Social Darwinism.” Journal of the His-tory of Ideas, 1972, vol. 33, no. 2.

A. B. GOFMAN

References in periodicals archive ?
With a romancer's faith in possibility, he rejects social Darwinism's fatal universe and theories of scientific racism.
Let us briefly recap the stages of transformation between the old "social Darwinism" and the new version.
Huxley's early critique of this form of 'Social Darwinism' is an interesting and humane nineteenth-century document, but little more.
Ignored in such an analysis is the effect of these thinkers' recent work on race and the public sphere: they have sharply undermined the various, differently motivated, sometimes long-preexisting attempts to conflate racial and ethnic identity with sociobiological categories and ideas of cultural nationalism - and this at a time when conservative intellectuals and policy makers are turning increasingly to social Darwinism in their deliberations on the governance of minorities and multicultural populations.
He outlines the roles of Burke, John Henry Newman, and others, as well as the French Revolution; conservatives and liberals in early America; the role of robber barons and social Darwinism in the othefto of conservatism; how conservatives and progressives changed; types and tensions in modern conservatism; presidential campaigns like those of Barry Goldwater and Ronald Reagan; and the Tea Party.
What Hanioglu highlights, perhaps more effectively than any other historian, is the extent to which Social Darwinism, positivism, and a popularized materialism shaped Kemal and his generation and the extent to which these ideas were distilled into a radical Westernism in the Turkish Republic.
It adds or expands discussions of research methods, mental health care for veterans, the application of Darwin's theories to human inequality, the rejection of social Darwinism by the next generation of social scientists, the controversial statement by Harvard U.
Civil War that was driven by the rise of pragmatism and social Darwinism as prevailing sources of meaning in society and particularly in jurisprudence.
Prescriptions for reversal of the increasing national dysfunction include a proposed mandatory healthcare insurance pool of all citizens wholesale rejection of the philosophy of Social Darwinism and a review of trade policies.
Olson explored "the historical significance of science in Western culture from the early modern age through the early romantic." In this volume, he continues the historical survey through the nineteenth century, in the process analyzing an amazing array of intellectual and social movements including, among others, the post-revolution French ideologues, Saint-Simonist socialism, positivism, Naturphilosophie, romanticism, and social Darwinism.
While Browne's primary concern is scientific, social aspects of Darwin's work do not escape her notice and discussion of Victorian religious shock, social Darwinism, the American State of Tennessee v.
I was disappointed that Cathy Young did not mention the resemblance between Objectivism and Social Darwinism. Because there is no natural brake on the tendency of self-interest to degenerate into an obsessive narcissism, both doctrines, if followed to their logical extremes, would lead humanity into a Hobbesian war of all against all.