Talcott Parsons

Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Wikipedia.

Parsons, Talcott


Born Dec. 13, 1902, in Colorado Springs, Colo. American theoretical sociologist; one of the major representatives of the structural-functional school of sociology. President of the American Sociological Association (1949).

Parsons has worked at Harvard University since 1927. From 1946 to 1956 he was chairman of the department of social relations.

Parsons has drawn upon the work of M. Weber, E. Durkheim, A. Marshall, and V. Pareto, as well as upon modern systems analysis, cybernetics, and the semiotics of symbols. He supports the construction of a general analytic, deductive theory of human action as the basis for solving particular empirical problems. According to Parsons, human action is a self-organizing system. The distinctiveness of this system, in contrast to the systems of physical or biological action, consists in the use of symbols, that is, in the presence of such symbolic regulatory mechanisms as language and values. Also distinctive is the normative quality of human behavior, that is, the dependence of an individual action on generally accepted values and norms. Finally the system of human action is distinguished by voluntariness, that is, a certain irrationality and independence from the cognizable conditions of the environment and at the same time a dependence on subjective situational determinants. On this basis, Parsons has constructed an abstract formalized model of a system of action that places the cultural, social, personality, and organism subsystems in relationships of mutual exchange. One of Parsons’ main ideas is the invariability of the set of functional problems, which always involves adaptation, goal attainment, integration, pattern-maintenance, and tension-management. The solutions to these functional problems is provided by specialized subsystems. Thus, within a social system the function of adaptation is carried out by the economic subsystem; that of goal attainment, by the political subsystem; that of integration, by legal institutions and customs; and that of pattern-maintenance by the system of beliefs, by morals, and by such agents of socialization as the family and educational institutions.

Parsonian concepts have significantly influenced American sociology, including empirical research. At the same time, Parsons’ theory has been criticized by empirically oriented or radical bourgeois sociologists, such as C. Wright Mills, for its excessive intellectual complexity and its conservatism. Marxist sociologists have criticized Parsons’ theory for its formalism, ahistoricism, idealism, undervaluation of the significance of social conflicts and contradictions, and apologetic aims. Marxist thought has demonstrated the insubstantiality of structural functionalism’s claim to be an all-encompassing sociological and anthropological theory; at the same time, however, Marxist thought does not deny the validity of a systemic approach to the analysis of social phenomena and processes.


Family Socialization and Interaction Process. London, 1956. (With J. Olds and others.)
Toward a General Theory of Action. Cambridge, Mass., 1959. (Edited by Parsons and E. A. Shils.)
The Social System, 2nd ed. Glencoe, Ill., 1959.
The Structure of Social Action, 2nd ed. New York, 1961.
Economy and Society. London, 1964. (With N. Smelser.)
Social Structure and Personality. New York, 1964.
Societies: Evolutionary and Comparative Perspectives. Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1966.
Sociological Theory and Modern Society. New York, 1967.
”Some Problems of General Theory in Sociology.” In J. McKinney and E. Tiryakian, eds., Theoretical Sociology. New York, 1970.
In Russian translation:
”Obshcheteoreticheskie problemy sotsiologii.” In Sotsiologiia segodnia. Moscow, 1965.
Informatsionnyi biulleten’ Nauchnogo soveta po problemam konkretnykh sotsial’nykh issledovanii AN SSSR, no. 6, issues 1–2. Moscow, 1968. No. 38: Moscow, 1969.


Zdravomyslov, A. G. Problema interesa v sotsiologicheskoi teorii. Leningrad, 1964.
Novikov, N. V. Kritika sovremennoi burzhuaznoi “nauki o sotsial’nom povedenii.” Moscow, 1966.
The Social Theories of Talcott Parsons: A Critical Examination. Edited by M. Black. New York, 1961.
Gouldner, A. W. The Coming Crisis of Western Sociology. London, 1970.


References in periodicals archive ?
Readers familiar with the different temporal and developmental phases of Talcott Parsons' work on action system theory will recognize that the four variables constituting the axes of differentiation for the four-function paradigm - internal, external, instrumental, consummatory - subsume, at the level of "symbolic action" characterizing his later work, a set of five pairs of pattern variables that characterized his theory in earlier stages of its development [1, pp.
"Talcott Parsons y Gino Germani: caminos cruzados, trayectorias convergentes", ponencia presentada en el "Seminario Internacional en memoria a los treinta anos de la muerte de Talcott Parsons", Universidad Nacional de Colombia, sede Bogota, Facultad de Ciencias Humanas, Departamento de Sociologia.
The Theory of Social Action: The Correspondence of Alfred Schutz and Talcott Parsons. Indiana University Press: Bloomington, IN.
(Imagine trying to be Talcott Parsons, John Maynard Keynes, and Louis Agassiz all at the same time and getting everything - indeed, anything - right.) Therefore, the more realistic standard for judging this book is how well the individual chapters contribute to specific strands of our broader effort to understand global change.
It differs from the 1958 version only in the omission of a note on Talcott Parsons and of a chapter on worker participation in Yugoslavia.(3) The 1993 edition is not truly revised and thus represents a missed opportunity to apply Dunlop's systems framework to current issues.
The social theory of Talcott Parsons and Edward Shils provided critical background for this thinking, but literally hundreds of articles and monographs spelled the theory out in concrete application.
At Columbia, a study of urban areas by the Bureau of Applied Social Research helped the Air Force develop "more dependable methods of the selection of air targets." In what, for Diamond, was perhaps the most egregious moral lapse of all, several academics, the eminent sociologist Talcott Parsons among them, tried to smuggle a suspected Nazi war criminal into the United States [see Jon Wiener, "Talcott Parsons' Role: Bringing Nazi Sympathizers to the U.S.," March 6, 1989].
Renwick also misses an opportunity to connect the recursive effect of Hobhouse on Talcott Parsons, who contributed so much in establishing the negative evaluation of sociology in Britain.
Du Bois, defining moments in 20th-century theory with Talcott Parsons and the Frankurt School.