Tokyo Trials

Tokyo Trials

 

the trials of Japan’s major war criminals, held in Tokyo between May 3,1946, and Nov. 12,1948, before the International War Tribunal for the Far East. The Tokyo Trials were convened in accordance with the terms set forth in the Potsdam Declaration of July 26, 1945, regarding the punishment of war criminals and in compliance with the Instrument of Surrender signed by Japan on Sept. 2,1945, which pledged “to carry out the provisions of the Potsdam Declaration in good faith.”

The tribunal heard the cases of 28 Japanese leaders indicted for war crimes and handed down judgments against 25 of them. Those tried and convicted were Tojo Hideki and three other former prime ministers—Hiranuma Kiichiro, Hirota Koki, and Koiso Kuniaki; 11 former ministers—Araki Sadao, Hata Shunro-ku, Hoshino Naoki, Itagaki Seishiro, Kaya Okinoro, Kido Koi-chi, Minami Jiro, Shigemitsu Mamuru, Shimada Shigetaro, Suzuki Teiichi, and Togo Shigenori; two ambassadors—Oshima Horishi and Shiratori Toshio; and eight members of the Imperial General Headquarters—Doihara Kenji, Hashimoto Kingoro, Kimura Heitaro, Matsui Iwane, Muto Akira, Oka Takasumi, Sato Kenryo, and Umezu Yoshijiro. Two other accused leaders, former Foreign Minister Matsuoka Yosuke and Admiral Nagano Osami, died during the proceedings, and their trial was discontinued. Similarly, the trial of Okawa Shumei, the ideologist of Japanese imperialism, was suspended when he became afflicted with progressive paralysis.

The tribunal held 818 open sessions and 131 closed sessions, during which it considered 4,356 pieces of documentary evidence and the testimony of 1,194 witnesses, 419 of whom testified in court. The accused were granted the right to defend themselves, submit evidence, and question witnesses; they were also allowed three or four attorneys each to assist them in their defense. At the end of the trials, the defendants’ guilt was fully established. Thus, on Nov. 4, 1948, after deliberations lasting more than six months, the tribunal began reading its decision, which ran to 1,214 pages.

The tribunal declared that in the period under consideration, 1928 to 1945, Japan had pursued a domestic and foreign policy geared toward aggressive war. It concluded that the defendants, in alliance with the leaders of fascist Germany and Italy, had aimed at attaining world domination, with the consequent enslavement of other nations. The tribunal examined in detail Japan’s acts of aggression against the USSR, finding them to have been part of Tokyo’s overall plan. It also pointed out that for a period of years Japan had waged aggressive war in China, its troops plundering and killing Chinese civilians, and that in December 1941 the Japanese military had attacked the American naval base at Pearl Harbor, as well as the cities of Hong Kong and Singapore, without a declaration of war.

The evidence accumulated in the course of the trials made manifest the real intentions behind Japan’s “new order” in East Asia. It also laid bare the expansionist designs of the Japanese imperialists, who, in order to conceal their efforts to create the pan-Asian empire of Yamato, had employed such deceptive slogans as Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere.

The tribunal sentenced Tojo, Hirota, Itagaki, Doihara, Kimura, and Muto to death by hanging and imposed prison sentences of 20 years and seven years on Togo and Shigemitsu, respectively. The remaining 16 defendants received life imprisonment. The death sentences were carried out in Tokyo on the night of Dec. 22–23,1948.

The Tokyo Trials, like the Nuremberg Trials, were of great importance in affirming the principles of international law. They cited these principles in declaring aggression to be a grave crime.

REFERENCE

Raginskii, M. Iu., and. S. Ia. Rozenblit. Mezhdunarodnyi protsessglavnykh iaponskikh voennykh prestupnikov. Moscow-Leningrad, 1950. M. Iu. RAGINSKII
References in periodicals archive ?
International trials were established on various occasions throughout history, he said, adding that for the first time after the Second World War, the Nuremberg and Tokyo Trials were established to punish those charged with crimes against peace and humanity.
Our country was one of the originators of the Nuremberg and Tokyo Trials.
During the Nuremberg and Tokyo trials after World War II, the elements of the crimes were defined and the International Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and the International Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) adopted specific elements in their statutes.
Indeed, General Tojo, the wartime prime minister, told the judges during the Tokyo Trials in 194648 that it was "inconceivable" for top civilian and military officials to take action that went against the wishes of the emperor.
But to make such an argument ignores the history of the court as it evolved from the aftermath of the Nuremburg Trials and the Tokyo trials, right through to the ad-hoc International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR).
Yasukuni Shrine has honored Japan's war dead since the 1800s, including those executed as Class-A war criminals after their conviction at the International Military Tribunal for the Far East, known as the Tokyo Trials held following the end of World War II.
A small sampling of topics: the dreams of divided countries (Germany and Korea), Germany and Japan 50 years after the end of their imperial ambitions, Japan's pathway to imperial power, the Tokyo Trials, Germany as a model for Japan, Chinese and Southeast Asian perspectives on Japan, and transitional justice on the atomic bombing of Hiroshima.
He also poses an important counterfactual question: What would have happened to Asian countries if they had reconciled their respective remembrances of the common past and if the San Francisco Treaty and the Tokyo Trials had not failed to acknowledge the sufferings and pain of Asian people due to Japanese aggression?
After the Nuremberg and Tokyo trials in 1945 and 1946 of the wartime leaders of Germany and Japan there was a hiatus, finally broken when in 1975 most of the world signed the Convention against Torture.
It is commendable that Totani has written a book that is not only easy to read, but also provides a chronological overview of the Tokyo Trials.
Even at the outset of the application of humanitarian law after World War II, Indian Justice Radhabinod Pal's dissenting opinion in the Tokyo Trials only argued that Crimes against Peace (i.
The highly politicized Tokyo Trials, which lasted April '46-December '48, have spawned a multitude of books, but only two major films, both with conspicuous slants.