voting machine

(redirected from Voting equipment)
Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus.
Related to Voting equipment: Electronic voting machines

voting machine,

instrument for recording and counting votes. The voting machine itself is generally positioned in a booth, often closed off by a curtain to assure secrecy for the voter.

In the case of older mechanical voting machines, when a voter enters the booth and closes the curtain by means of a lever, the machine unlocks for voting. The titles of all elective offices are listed on the face of the machine along with the party candidates running for each office. Above each name is a lever which, when depressed, indicates a vote for that candidate. Only one candidate for each office may be selected. Write-in votes are possible and propositions are placed at the top of the ballot. When the voter pulls the curtain open to leave, the machine automatically registers the vote and is cleared for use by the next person.

The mecahnical voting machine was first used in New York state in 1892, and came to be used throughout the United States. Faster and more accurate in tabulating the vote than the paper ballotballot,
means of voting for candidates for office. The choice may be indicated on or by the ballot forms themselves—e.g., colored balls (hence the term ballot, which is derived from the Italian ballotta,
..... Click the link for more information.
, mechanical voting machines were gradually replaced in many parts of the United States in the late 20th cent. by so-called electronic or computerized voting machines. In one form of electronic voting, voters indicate their preferences using punch cards that are read by computer, but in the United States punch cards fell out of favor after their use led to controversy in the 2000 presidential election. Both lever-type mechanical voting machines and punch-card-based machines were replaced by other systems with federal aid provided under the Help American Vote Act (2002).

Other modern voting technologies include the optical-scan system, in which marked ballots are read by computer using optical sensingoptical sensing,
in general, any method by which information that occurs as variations in the intensity, or some other property, of light is translated into an electric signal. This is usually accomplished by the use of various photoelectric devices.
..... Click the link for more information.
, and the direct-record electronic voting system, in which a voter chooses a candidate by means of push buttons or touch screens on a computerized voting machine, which tallies the votes. A number of experts, including the National Institute of Standards and Technology, have called for direct-record electronic systems to have increased safeguards against potential computer tampering and/or to provide a paper record of an individual's vote so that a non-electronic means of recounting a challenged electoral result would exist.

Estonia has used Internet voting, via a website, as an alternative form of voting. Voters use a computer-readable identification card and enter two passwords before they vote. The method was pioneered in local elections in 2005 and used in national elections in 2007.

The voting machine's greatest asset is protection against voting fraud or human error. However, critics claim that it intimidates some citizens, that some machines are subject to breakdown, and that fraud is not completely eliminated. Computerized voting machines that use punch cards are also susceptible to voter error, as they lack the means to prevent a person from voting for two candidates for the same office, and can fail to register a vote clearly.

For many years the United States was the only country that used voting machines extensively; Brazil now uses a national computerized voting system. The cost of voting machines, combined with less frequent elections and simpler ballots in many countries, make them impractical for worldwide use.

References in periodicals archive ?
550, a bill that would require electronic voting equipment to have a paper trail, something 27 states already require and 23 others are likely to require soon.
From programming delays in West Virginia to late machine arrivals in parts of Arkansas, Indiana and elsewhere, officials from the company say it has been a "challenging year" as jurisdictions around the country rush to meet federal requirements by purchasing heaps of new voting equipment.
Though strong national standards go against the grain of the traditional emphasis on local and state control of election procedures, recent problems with voting equipment, ballot design, unequal resources for polling places, and arbitrary enforcement of state and local rules argue for a set of nation al standards to guarantee the contemporary democratic principle of one person, one vote.
De La Rue only bought Sequoia, one of the USA's largest providers of electronic voting equipment and election services, at the end of May 2002 from paper and packaging group, Jefferson Smurfit.
We need what other democratic nations have, a right to vote in our federal Constitution and a national elections commission that sets uniform standards, helps to develop the best voting equipment, and partners with the states and counties to run good, clean elections.
YES It became clear during the 2000 presidential election that voting equipment nationwide was inaccurate and outdated.
Obtaining injunctions against using voting equipment that doesn't meet high standards of trustworthiness can contribute to a sustained debate about the issues.
The commission will serve as a national clearinghouse and resource on administration of federal elections, including providing testing and certification of voting equipment and software to meet new national standards.
States are expected to design plans to upgrade voting equipment, improve election administration and the training of poll workers, and build statewide databases of registered voters.
When the accuracy of voting equipment is called into question, as it was during the 2000 presidential elections, so is the entire U.
With nearly $3 billion likely to be flowing to the states to modernize voting equipment, IRV has become technically feasible.
This project provides potential opportunities for consultants with expertise in legislative operations and reform, training, electronic voting equipment, and computer hardware and software.