Wisconsin v. Yoder

Also found in: Wikipedia.

Wisconsin v. Yoder,

case decided in 1972 by the U.S. Supreme Court, which held that Amish children could be exempted from compulsory school-attendance beyond the 8th grade; the Amish (see under MennonitesMennonites
, descendants of the Dutch and Swiss evangelical Anabaptists of the 16th cent. Beliefs and Membership

While each congregation is at liberty to decide independently on its form of worship and other matters, Mennonites generally agree on certain
..... Click the link for more information.
) community's interest in maintaining a simple way of life, which it saw threatened by higher education, outweighed the state's interest in schooling through the 10th grade. The Supreme Court had not previously exempted religious groups from such laws, and it stressed that the 300-year Amish tradition was crucial to its decision.
The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia™ Copyright © 2013, Columbia University Press. Licensed from Columbia University Press. All rights reserved. www.cc.columbia.edu/cu/cup/
References in periodicals archive ?
Verner and Wisconsin v. Yoder; religious freedom from 1980 to 1995, including the Oregon v.
Ballard prohibited government from declaring religious truth, an anthropologist shapes the Supreme Court decision in Wisconsin v. Yoder, Lemon v.
Board of Education (1947), Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972), Epperson v.
Verner in 1963 and Wisconsin v. Yoder in 1972 and that the federal government's refusal to grant an exemption to the church did not pass that test.
In the 1971 Amish case, Wisconsin v. Yoder, the court yielded to the Amish parents in Wisconsin who believed in home schooling and their own teaching of the Bible and were opposed to the indoctrination of values found in public schools.
Verner in 1963 and Wisconsin v. Yoder in 1972--the justices employed a "compelling interest" test to limit government infringements on religious practices.
Peters accurately describes the transition of Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972) from being the clearest application of the "compelling state interest test" articulated in Sherbert v.
Full browser ?