agricultural subsidies

Also found in: Legal.

agricultural subsidies,

financial assistance to farmers through government-sponsored price-support programs. Beginning in the 1930s most industrialized countries developed agricultural price-support policies to reduce the volatility of prices for farm products and to increase, or at least stabilize, farm income. In food-exporting countries, such as the United States and France, agricultural subsidies have been designed primarily to increase farm income, either by raising the long-term level of prices above free-market levels or by providing direct payments to farmers. The sale of agricultural products to developing nations at below market prices has often had a devastating effect on the ability of farmers in those nations to prosper, and the continuation of such subsidies has become a stumbling block to efforts to dismantle international trade barriers.

U.S. Assistance Programs

In the United States, the federal government first assisted agriculture directly in the 1920s. During World War I farmers had been encouraged to increase production, and in the postwar period wartime levels of production were maintained. This resulted in an oversupply that caused a sharp drop in prices. The Agricultural Credits Act (1923) failed to solve the problem. In 1929, President Hoover signed the Agricultural Marketing Act, establishing the Federal Farm Board with a fund of $500 million to further farming cooperatives and to set up stabilization boards, which by their purchases on the open market were to stabilize the prices of grain and cotton. Such purchases, however, only encouraged farmers to raise still larger crops in expectation of greater profits; consequently, the Farm Board failed and had to sell its holdings at a loss of $200 million.

The Agricultural Adjustment Act (AAA) of 1933, one of the first pieces of legislation passed under President Franklin Delano Roosevelt's New Deal program, attempted to control farm prices by reducing and controlling the supply of basic crops. The AAA empowered the Secretary of Agriculture to fix marketing quotas for major farm products, to take surplus production off the market, and to reduce production of staple crops by offering producers payments in return for voluntarily reducing the acreage devoted to raising such crops. The Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC), also created in 1933, began making loans to farmers on agricultural products. Loans were granted only to farmers who agreed to sign production-control agreements. Farm prices steadily improved: between 1932 and 1937 the prices for major farm products increased by approximately 85%. However, the Supreme Court declared certain production control features of the AAA unconstitutional.

Large crops of wheat and cotton led to passage of the Agricultural Act of 1937. In its amended form, this act provided the framework for the major farm programs in effect since that time. The act made price-support loans by the CCC mandatory on the designated basic commodities of corn, wheat, and cotton; optional support was authorized for other commodities. Under this act and related legislation, the CCC has supported more than 100 different commodities, including fruit, vegetables, and various types of seed.

From 1941 to 1948, during and just after World War II, surpluses were rapidly utilized, and price supports were used as an incentive to stimulate production of agricultural commodities. In 1948 price-support levels were lowered for most of those commodities. By 1949 the agriculture of war-devastated Europe and Asia had recovered to a significant extent, and demand for American farm products declined considerably. At the same time, however, crop production in the United States had greatly increased, with the result that farm commodity prices dropped and surpluses began to build up again. Rigid support levels were once again enacted, but the Korean War strengthened farm prices and most CCC stocks were sold. Mounting surpluses and increased costs of government programs led to the enactment of a flexible price support program (1954) and of the Soil Bank program (1956), which provided for direct payments to farmers in return for reducing their acreage of major supported crops and required that they leave fallow the land removed from production. The desired effect of control programs was largely negated, because improved technology made it possible to greatly increase yields per acre.

In the early 1960s price supports on major commodities were dropped to or near market-clearing prices, and producers' incomes were protected by direct payments on fixed quantities of products. Direct payments to farmers greatly increased after the 1960s, the feed grain, cotton, and wheat programs accounting for most of this increase.

Attempts at Ending Subsidies

Once introduced, subsidies to maintain prices have proved extremely difficult to end. In France, farmers have vigorously protested decreases in subsidies that have made them the second largest food exporter after the United States. In 1996, the U.S. Congress, despite its long history of farm price supports, passed the Freedom to Farm Act, which eliminated agricultural subsidies in favor of fixed payments to farmers. The legislation failed to decrease payments to farmers, however, and by 2000 aid to farmers (including so-called emergency payments) had reached more than $22 billion, three times the 1996 level. A new federal farm bill in 2002 abandoned the 1996 goal of reducing farm payments, increasing base program expenditures by 80%. Agricultural subsidies in the United States, the European Community (now the European Union; EU),and Japan were issues of contentious debate in the Uruguay (1986–94) round of international trade negotiations under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and remain so in the World Trade Organization (WTO). In 2005, for example, the WTO issued rulings against U.S. cotton and EU sugar exports in which it said that subsidies distorted world trade.


See D. Goodman and M. Redclift, ed., The International Farm Crisis (1967); G. L. Cramer, Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness (1979); C. Peter Timmer, Getting Prices Right: The Scope and Limits of Agricultural Price Policy (1986); W. P. Browne, Private Interests, Public Policy, and American Agriculture (1989).

References in periodicals archive ?
'We will continue successful interventions , such as agricultural subsidies, other agricultural input incentives and support cards including those for fertilizers and seeds, support for agricultural rehabilitation, agriculture credit at easy terms," said finance minister AHM Mostafa Kamal while placing the proposed budget in the Jatiya Sangsad here today.
Newspaper reports that the government is set to withdraw agricultural subsidies ahead of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) package have shocked stakeholders.
"For example, agricultural subsidies, tax exemptions, granting equipment and fertilizers on preferential terms, rendering leasing services, improving licensing, suspending inspections and other mechanisms play an important role in the development of entrepreneurship."
Current expenditures in 2019 total 202.6 billion denars and are intended for the payment of public sector salaries and the salary increase of 5 percent in the last quarter of 2019, for regular payment of pensions, for the guaranteed minimum income and other welfare payments, for payment of agricultural subsidies and for the reinforced support for small and medium businesses.
Th EP's delegation visited Slovakia between December 17 and 19 to check the agricultural subsidies paid to the companies which have no business linked to agriculture.
WinCosub allows the management of all agricultural subsidies of the Confederation and the Canton of Zurich for projects in civil engineering with a subsidy volume in the seven-figure range.
116.6 million soms were spent for agricultural subsidies.
He added that agricultural subsidies granted in 2017 exceeded 2.5 million dinars for 2,000 recipients.
Estimates by agricultural economists and others point to anywhere between $15 billion and $25 billion spent a year on agricultural subsidies. (WTO agreement, signed in 2015, scraps agricultural export subsidies, not all agricultural subsidies.) Robert Guest estimates that "the total value of agricultural subsidies in developed countries is almost a billion dollars a day".
They want even more, though a country of comparable population, New Zealand, long ago abandoned agricultural subsidies and its un-subsidised lamb sells competitively against highly subsidised Welsh mountain lamb.
Agricultural subsidies will amount 160 million euro and will not be abused, only allocated to the real farmers in need.
The author argues that the World Trade Organization (WTO) dispute settlement system and the parallel multilateral negotiation process can impact unethical trade distortions in agricultural subsidies. She considers the case of the US-Subsidies on Upland Cotton, in which Brazil challenged US upland cotton and export credit guarantee subsidies in 2002-2009, and the jurisprudence, findings, and legal, economic, and ethical basis for the findings of the Panel, Appellate Body, and Arbitrators reports, to understand their impact on multilateral and domestic reform of agricultural subsidies.

Full browser ?