autonomous weapon


Also found in: Dictionary, Medical.

autonomous weapon

An unmanned robotic foot soldier, tank or drone that is capable of making decisions on its own. Unlike the drones in use today, emerging autonomous weapons choose their targets without human intervention. In 2015, 1,000 technology professionals along with Stephen Hawking (theoretical physicist and author), Steve Wozniak (Apple co-founder) and Elon Musk (Tesla and Space-X) called for a worldwide ban on autonomous weapons, contending they will make war easier to start and become a threat to humanity.
References in periodicals archive ?
Summary: In a sense, autonomous weapons are not new.
There is a wide variety of topics related to the development and employment of lethal autonomous weapon systems.
Petrov was mentioned only once at a side event to the 2017 meeting of the Group of Governmental Experts (GGE) on Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems at the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW), held November 13-17 at the UN in Geneva, Switzerland.
Without a platform to share those concerns governments may assume silence is consent of support, so we have created a letter for military personnel, both current or retired, to sign on to also to support a pre-emptive ban on autonomous weapon systems.
It says: "Once developed, lethal autonomous weapons will permit armed conflict to be fought at a scale greater than ever, and at timescales faster than humans can comprehend.
Available technology and unforeseen world events will make it increasingly difficult to apply the law of armed conflict and international law relating to the use of force via autonomous weapons systems in a consistent manner that adheres to U.
In short, however, I propose that the notion of 'Meaningful Human Control' over the use of a weapon is only satisfied where the control that a fighter exercises over a weapon is to such a degree that the actions of an Autonomous Weapon System are entirely his--the system depends on the control of the human fighter to execute the 'critical functions' like the decision as to who to kill and legal calculations on the lawfulness of an attack.
A discrete concern from the previous discussion of warfare in the cyber domain, the application of technologies such as lethal autonomous weapon systems (LAWs) requires reviewing and perhaps revising the principles and practices associated with military ethics across the four physical domains.
The organizations that oppose the deployment of autonomous weapons argue that a commander or operator of a LAWS "could not be held directly liable for a fully autonomous weapon's unlawful actions because the robot would have operated independently.
Given that a successful ban on autonomous weapon systems is unlikely (and possibly even detrimental), what is needed is a complementary legal regime that holds states accountable for the injurious wrongs that are the side effects of employing these uniquely effective but inherently unpredictable and dangerous weapons.
requirement, a new autonomous weapon system must have an effective means
Last year, the Vatican joined a handful of nations calling for a preemptive ban on what are known as "fully autonomous weapons.

Full browser ?