constructivism


Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Wikipedia.

constructivism,

Russian art movement founded c.1913 by Vladimir TatlinTatlin, Vladimir
, 1885–1953, Russian painter and sculptor, known as the Father of Russian constructivism. After graduating (1910) from the Moscow Academy of Fine Arts, he traveled to Paris where he was so influenced by Picasso's reliefs that he became a sculptor.
..... Click the link for more information.
, related to the movement known as suprematismsuprematism,
Russian art movement founded (1913) by Casimir Malevich in Moscow, parallel to constructivism. Malevich drew Aleksandr Rodchenko and El Lissitzky to his revolutionary, nonobjective art.
..... Click the link for more information.
. After 1916 the brothers Naum GaboGabo, Naum
, 1890–1977, Russian sculptor, architect, theorist, and teacher, brother of Antoine Pevsner. Gabo lived in Munich and Norway until the end of the revolution, when he returned to Russia.
..... Click the link for more information.
 and Antoine PevsnerPevsner, Antoine
, 1886–1962, Russian sculptor and painter. He was influenced by cubism while in Paris in 1911 and 1913. During World War I he was in Norway with his brother Naum Gabo. They returned to Moscow after the Russian Revolution.
..... Click the link for more information.
 gave new impetus to Tatlin's art of purely abstract (although politically intended) constructions. Their sculptural works derived from cubismcubism,
art movement, primarily in painting, originating in Paris c.1907. Cubist Theory

Cubism began as an intellectual revolt against the artistic expression of previous eras.
..... Click the link for more information.
 and futurismfuturism,
Italian school of painting, sculpture, and literature that flourished from 1909, when Filippo Tommaso Marinetti's first manifesto of futurism appeared, until the end of World War I.
..... Click the link for more information.
, but had a more architectonic and machinelike emphasis related to the technology of the society in which they were created. The Soviet regime at first encouraged this new style. However, beginning in 1921, constructivism (and all modern art movements) were officially disparaged as unsuitable for mass propaganda purposes. Gabo and Pevsner went into exile, while Tatlin remained in Russia. In theatrical scene design constructivism spread beyond Russia through the efforts of Vsevolod MeyerholdMeyerhold, Vsevolod
, 1874–1940?, Russian theatrical director and producer. Meyerhold led the revolt against naturalism in the Russian theater. Working with the Moscow Art Theater, he experimented with his own directing ideas until the outbreak of the Revolution.
..... Click the link for more information.
.

Bibliography

See G. Rickey, Constructivism (1967).

Constructivism

(1920–1935)
A movement originating in Moscow based on order, logic, structure, abstraction and geometry, primarily in sculpture but with broad applications to architecture. An expression of construction was the base for all building design with emphasis on functional machine parts. Vladimir Tatlin’s monument is the most notable example of this style. The industrial fantasies of Jacob Tchernikhov, published in 1933, show buildings perched on cantilevered structures, suggesting construction for construction’s sake. The movement can be regarded as part of the broader movement of functionalism, with an accent on constructional expression. All traditional accessories, such as ornamental details, were discarded in favor of mass and space in relation to the new sculptural forms.

Constructivism

 

a movement in Soviet art during the 1920’s (in architecture, stage design, poster art, book illustration, artistic design, and literature). The first group of constructivists, which included A. M. Gan, A. M. Rodchenko, V. F. Stepanova, and the brothers V. A. Stenberg and G. A. Stenberg, arose in 1921 at Inkhuk (Institute of Artistic Culture). The constructivists advocated the construction of an environment that actively guided life’s processes. They sought to interpret the aesthetic qualities of such materials as metal, wood, and glass and the formal possibilities of the new technology and of its logical, rational constructions.

The slogans of production art were partially realized in constructivist works. The constructivists contrasted the simplicity and the underlying utilitarianism of new forms, which personified to them democracy and the new relationships among people, with the ostentatious splendor of bourgeois life.

In architecture, constructivist principles were developed in theoretical statements by A. A. Vesnin and M. la. Ginzburg. These principles were implemented in the Palace of Labor project in Moscow, which was designed in 1923 by the brothers A. A. Vesnin, V. A. Vesnin, and L. A. Vesnin. The basis of this building’s construction—the reinforced-concrete frame—is revealed in the new exterior appearance; the building was constructed according to a precise, rational plan.

In 1925 a creative organization of constructivists, the OSA (Association of Contemporary Architects), was founded. Its organ of publication was the journal Sovremennaia arkhitektura (Contemporary Architecture; 1926–30). In this journal the constructivist architects set forth their creed, the so-called functional method, which required that architects take into account the particular purpose of buildings, structures, and architectural complexes when creating their rational designs and providing their equipment.

Along with other groups of Soviet architects, the constructivists (the Vesnin brothers, M. la. Ginzburg, I. I. Leonidov, A. S. Nikol’skii, M. O. Barshch, V. N. Vladimirov, and others) sought new methods and principles of urban design and planning, suggested projects for the restructuring of the conditions of life, and created new types of public buildings (Palace of Labor, House of the Soviets, workers’ clubs, and factory-kitchens). However, in both theory and practice the constructivists made a number of mistakes (the labeling of the apartment as “a material form of petit bourgeois ideology,” the regimentation of life in several communal housing projects, the failure to take geographical and climatic conditions into account, and the underestimation of the role of large cities that resulted from ideas of deurbanization).

To a certain degree, the aesthetics of constructivism facilitated the establishment of Soviet artistic design. On the basis of work done by constructivists, such as A. M. Rodchenko and A. M. Gan, new types of dishes, hardware, and furniture were designed that were convenient and could be mass-produced. The artists created designs for fabrics (V. F. Stepanova and L. S. Popova) and designed practical working clothes (V. F. Stepanova and V. E. Tatlin). New ways of mounting exhibits were also devised (El Lissitzky).

Constructivism also played an important role in the development of poster art (the photomontage of the Stenberg brothers, G. G. Klutsis, and A. M. Rodchenko) and typographical design (new ways of using the expressive possibilities of type and type-setting materials appeared in the work of A. A. Gan and El Lissitzky).

In theater, instead of a traditional set, the constructivists designed “scaffoldings” for the work of the actors, who were dressed in overalls. The design of these “scaffoldings” was governed by the stage action (L. S. Popova, A. A. Vesnin, and others—for the productions of V. E. Meyerhold and A. la. Tairov).

The usage of the term constructivism in the plastic arts outside of the USSR is rather arbitrary. In architecture it designates a tendency in functionalism that seeks to accentuate the expressiveness of contemporary constructions. In painting and sculpture, constructivism is one of the avant-garde movements which uses several of the formal experiments of early Soviet constructivism (the sculptors N. Gabo and A. Pevsner).

In literature, constructivist tendencies, answering the “leftist” demands for a “revolution of form” (transformation of language, poetry, and genres), was given impetus by the slogans of Lef, or the Left Front of the Arts (emphasis on the “construction of materials” instead of the artist’s intuitive style; on the montage style, or cinematic style, in prose; on propaganda poetry; and on journalistic language). In 1923, K. L. Zelinskii, I. L. Sel’vinskii, and A. N. Chicherin advanced constructivism as an independent movement primarily in poetry. Their manifesto appeared in 1924 in their collection Mena vsekh (Exchange of Everything). In that same year the Literary Center of Constructivists (LTsK) was formed. The group’s theorist was K. L. Zelinskii; its members included I. L. Sel’vinskii, V. A. Lugovskoi, V. M. Inber, B. N. Agapov, and A. P. Kviatkovskii. E. G. Bagritskii was also associated with LTsK.

The theoretical tenets of constructivism, unlike those of Lef, recognized the sovereign rights of poetry; however, the regularity of its development as a phenomenon of spiritual culture was replaced in many cases by the focus on the “technical rigging” of culture. An example is the principle of the “loading” of a word, or the design distribution of material—“the maximum required load of the indispensible per unit of the material, that is, brief, compact, saying much in a small space and everything in a point” (Mena vsekh [collection], 1924, p. 8)—which in its extreme form led to the style of the slogan and advertisement (experiments of A. N. Chicherin).

On the other hand, a topical principle became an expression of constructive organization. This principle was the construction of a theme from words and rhythms most closely related to it. In I. L. Sel’vinskii’s poetry laboratory the author’s language was transformed into that of the character or environment being described. For example, the poem The Thief (1922) was written entirely in the vernacular of the thief. Sel’vinskii used phonetic transcription with the designation of tone to convey the rhythmic correspondences of pronunciation (for example, song and dance rhythms).

The constructivists incorporated into poetry various devices of prose (inflation of prose) and distinctive lexical strata (professional terminology and jargon). They rejected lyrical emotions, preferring clearly organized narrative poetry and epic genres. However, the constructivists did not create a “style of the epoch” as they had intended. In 1930 the Literary Center of Constructivists disbanded. The role of LTsK in Soviet poetry was deter-mined not by its erroneous theoretical aims but by the creative work of its talented poets, who left behind them a rich legacy of poetry.

REFERENCES

Gan, A. Konstruktivizm. Tver’, 1922.
Kino-fot. 1922–23.
Sovremennaia arkhitektura. 1926–30.
Literaturnye manifesty (ot simvolizma k Oktiabriu). Moscow, 1929.
Iz istorii sovetskoi arkhitektury, 1917–1925, gg: Dokumenty i materialy. Moscow, 1963.
Sovetskoe literaturovedenie i kritika. Moscow, 1966. (Bibliographical index.)
Iz istorii sovetskoi arkhitektury, 1926–1932 gg.: Dokumenty i materialy. Moscow, 1970.

S. O. KHAN-MAGOMEDOV (introduction, architecture), V. I. RAKITIN (artistic construction, graphics, stage design), and A. A. MOROZOV (literature)

Constructivism

Constructivism: Tatlin’s project
A movement which originated in Moscow after 1917, primarily in sculpture, but with broad applications to architecture. The expression of construction was to be the basis for all building design, with emphasis on functional machine parts. Tatlin’s project of a monument to the Third International in Moscow (1920) is the most famous example.
References in periodicals archive ?
We will not get into a detailed description of the great debates in this research and the purpose of making reference to the debates is that we can, in very basic terms, see how constructivism as a theoretical framework evolved in relation to the major theoretical divides in IR.
"Constructivism is an approach to teaching and learning based on the premise that cognition (learning) is the result of "mental construction".
Constructivism, especially state identity theory explained by Alexander Wendt and Peter Katzenstein, has become far from the almost particularly rationalist mainstream of international relations theory.
Her use of RSP theory adds an intuitively appealing approach to understanding the institution that successfully threads the line between the obvious problems of a realist interpretation of ASEAN versus an unsustainable devotion to a shift in identity that characterizes most constructivist examinations of ASEAN (though we should note that constructivism is far broader than the book's discussion of it tends to allow).
However, constructivism and social learning theory also provide very useful insights into understanding learning within organisational settings.
Borrowing the language of radical constructivism, the resulting contributions are intended to "perturb" the status quo and get constructivists and non-constructivists alike thinking about constructivism's past, future, strengths, weaknesses, and overall utility.
In recent decades science education is dominated by constructivism which has been seen as an attractive word in science education learning environment in schools and colleges (Fensham 1992and 2004).
When claiming relationships of mutual constitution and causation between structure and agency, constructivism usually falls into under-explanation or under-specification, as it gives the impression that everything--all the considered factors or variables--is mutually constituted and caused, as if 'everything explained everything': where ideational structures are claimed to cause and constitute each other and agency, it becomes rather difficult to answer questions about the causes (why?) and the ways (how?) agency occurs.
The purpose of this study was to review and synthesize relevant literature and theoretical frameworks relating to constructivism and its application to teaching via undergraduate research in agriculture.
Is Mayer (2009) correct when he suggests constructivism is a good learning theory but not a good prescription for learning?
They are the 'Constructivists' and their position is called 'Constructivism'.

Full browser ?