correspondence principle

Also found in: Dictionary, Wikipedia.

correspondence principle,

physical principle, enunciated by Niels Bohr in 1923, according to which the predictions of the quantum theoryquantum theory,
modern physical theory concerned with the emission and absorption of energy by matter and with the motion of material particles; the quantum theory and the theory of relativity together form the theoretical basis of modern physics.
..... Click the link for more information.
 must correspond to the predictions of the classical theories of physics when the quantum theory is used to describe the behavior of systems that can be successfully described by classical theories. Technically this principle means that the results of a quantum theory analysis of a problem that involves the use of very large quantum numbers must agree with the results of a classical physics analysis. Such correspondence is known as the classical limit of the quantum theory. Ordinarily the quantum theory is used to describe the behavior of bodies that are so small that they cannot be seen under an optical microscope, while the theories of classical physics are used to analyze the behavior of large-scale bodies. The correspondence principle provided an important theoretical basis for the development of a detailed correlation between the newer quantum theory and the classical physics that preceded it.

Correspondence principle

A fundamental hypothesis according to which classical mechanics can be understood as a limiting case of quantum mechanics; or conversely, many characteristic features in quantum mechanics can be approximated on the basis of classical mechanics, provided classical mechanics is properly reinterpreted. This idea was first proposed by N. Bohr in the early 1920s as a set of rules for understanding the spectra of simple atoms and molecules.

The classical motions in simple dynamical systems can be understood as composed of independent partial motions, each with its own degree of freedom. Each degree of freedom accumulates its own classical action-integral. The frequency of the classical motion for any particular degree of freedom is given by the partial derivative of the energy function with respect to the corresponding action. Bohr noticed that this classical result yields the correct quantum-theoretical result for the light frequency in a transition from one energy level to another, provided the derivative is replaced by the difference in the energies. Moreover, precise information about the possibility of such transitions and their intensities is obtained by analyzing the related classical motion. This information becomes better as the quantum numbers involved be come larger. The apparent inconsistencies in Bohr's quantum theory are thereby overcome by a set of rules that came to be called the correspondence principle. See Action

After 1925, the success of the new quantum mechanics, particularly wave mechanics, reduced the correspondence principle to a somewhat vague article of faith among physicists. However, the appeal to classical mechanics is still convenient for some rather crude estimates such as the total number of levels below a given energy. Such estimates help in finding the approximate shape of large atoms and large nuclei in the Thomas-Fermi model.

The correspondence principle, however, has assumed a more profound significance. Experimental techniques in atomic, molecular, mesoscopic, and nuclear physics have improved dramatically. High-precision data for many thousands of energy levels are available where the traditional methods of quantum mechanics are not very useful or informative. However, the basic idea behind the correspondence principle must still be valid: Quantum mechanics must be understandable in terms of classical mechanics for the highly excited states, even in difficult cases like the three-body problem, where the overall behavior seems unpredictable and chaotic. The wider application of Bohr's correspondence principle allows many basic but difficult problems to be seen in a new light. See Atomic structure and spectra, Chaos, Mesoscopic physics, Molecular structure and spectra, Quantum mechanics

Correspondence Principle


a postulate of quantum mechanics requiring that in the limiting case of large quantum numbers the physical consequences of quantum mechanics coincide with the results of classical theory. The correspondence principle reflects the circumstance that quantum effects are significant only in the consideration of very small objects, where the values of action are comparable to Planck’s constant h. If, however, the quantum numbers characterizing the state of a physical system, such as the orbital angular momentum quantum number l, are large, then the quantity h may be ignored and the system obeys classical laws to a high degree of accuracy. From the formal point of view, the correspondence principle means that as ħ → 0, the quantum-mechanical description of physical objects becomes equivalent to the classical description.

The correspondence principle is often understood in the following more general sense: any new theory that claims to present a deeper description of physical reality and to have a broader range of applicability than the old theory must include the old theory as a limiting case. Thus, relativistic mechanics (seeRELATIVITY, THEORY OF) is equivalent to classical mechanics in the limit of low speeds v—that is, when vc, where c is the speed of light in a vacuum. Formally, the classical limit is approached when c → ∞.

When the fundamental axioms of a theory have already been formulated, the correspondence principle is of primarily illustrative value: the principle draws attention to the continuity of theoretical constructs. In a number of cases, the correspondence principle is helpful in developing approximate methods of problem solving. For example, if in a given physical problem h can be regarded as small, this situation is equivalent to the quasiclassical approximation to quantum mechanics. The nonrelativistic Schrödinger wave equation in this case results in the classical Hamilton-Jacobi equation as h— → 0. When, however, the principles of a new theoretical discipline that is taking shape are still largely unclear, the correspondence principle has independent heuristic value.

The correspondence principle was advanced in 1923 by N. Bohr in the old quantum theory, which preceded quantum mechanics. Bohr applied the principle to the problem of atomic emission and absorption spectra. Subsequently, after a consistent quantum mechanics had been created, the characteristics of atomic spectra were explained on a deeper foundation, with the essential features of the mathematical apparatus being determined by the correspondence principle.

The importance of the correspondence principle, however, goes far beyond the framework of quantum mechanics. The principle is widely used in quantum electrodynamics and elementary particle theory and undoubtedly will be an integral part of any new theoretical scheme.


Bohr, N. Tri stat’i o spektrakh i slroenii atomov. Moscow-Petrograd, 1923. (Translated from German.)
Blokhintsev, D. I. Osnovy kvantovoi mekhaniki, 3rd ed. Moscow, 1961.
Schiff, L. Kvanwvaia mekhanika. Moscow, 1957. (Translated from English.)


correspondence principle

[‚kär·ə′spän·dəns ‚prin·sə·pəl]
(quantum mechanics)
The principle that quantum mechanics has a classical limit in which it is equivalent to classical mechanics. Also known as Bohr's correspondence principle.
References in periodicals archive ?
Solid-Planar Correspondence Principle. In order to address the solid-planar correspondence principle, let us first consider a single cylindrical monopole of length l and radio [r.sub.d].
The correspondence principle, as Max Jammer wrote, "turned out to be a most versatile and productive conceptual device for the further development of the older quantum theory--and [...] even for the establishment of modern quantum mechanics.
The last point supports a broader observation: even MPC-influenced legislatures that enacted the primary culpability presumptions may be neither as fully committed to mens rea requirements for all offense elements as codification of those presumptions might suggest, nor as committed to that position as advocates of the correspondence principle and the MPC are.
The notion of preservation of structure from one theory to another has been called the "correspondence principle".
The elastic-viscoelastic correspondence principle is applied to evaluate damage growth and healing cyclic loading separately from time-dependent characteristics of the material.
Bohr proposed a rule of thumb called the correspondence principle (SN: 1/11/86, p.
Second, and far more fundamentally, Scruton violates what philosophers of science call "The Correspondence Principle." This rule states that when a theory is propounded to replace an earlier theory that works in certain contexts, the new theory must reduce back to the earlier one in appropriate limiting cases.
The theoretical literature on devaluation has involved an appeal to the Correspondence Principle for many years.
The chief difference between this revised Kantianism and the philosophy of Kant is that, whereas for Kant the conditions for the possibility of experience, through which we make sense of talk of objects of experience are fixed and immutable, in the revised version they develop along with the development of science.The core of the project will involve an examination of the status of the correspondence principle, a crucial ingredient in the transformation of the old quantum theory to the new quantum theory.
Part II takes a closer look at variations among the twenty-four MPC states in their legislative commitment to the correspondence principle. It does so by highlighting several statutory departures from the MPC version of mens rea presumptions.
In a series of papers originally published between 1918 and 1922, Bohr elaborates on his correspondence principle, discussing the theory's applications from a uniform point of view and considering the underlying assumptions in relation to ordinary mechanics and electrodynamics.
In order to treat the tensile data systematically, we use the strain-time correspondence principle [ref.

Full browser ?