military law

(redirected from court-martial)
Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Medical, Legal, Financial, Acronyms, Wikipedia.

military law

military law, system of rules established for the government of persons in the armed forces. In most countries the legislature establishes the code of military law. It is distinguished from both martial law (rule by domestic military forces over an area) and military government (rule by the military over occupied foreign territory). The scope of military law differs somewhat in peace and in war. In time of peace it is generally limited to military offenses—e.g., absence without leave, desertion, breach of orders; during war it usually extends to crimes of a civil nature as well, and the penalties may be more severe.

The Uniform Code of Military Justice

Regular systems of military law existed in ancient Rome, with severe penalties for such offenses as desertion. In the Middle Ages procedures were less regularized, but written codes began to appear. The origin of much military law is found in the codes and statutes enacted in England in the 17th cent. These were substantially adopted in the United States.

It was widely felt after World War II that many abuses had occurred in the administration of American military justice and that excessively severe sentences had been imposed, especially on the enlisted ranks. The armed forces responded by establishing civilian review boards, which recommended reduction of the punishment inflicted on a large percentage of those convicted (some 100,000) by general court-martial during the war. In 1951, Congress extensively revised the codes of military law enacting a uniform code of military justice for all branches of the armed services. This code placed operations more in the hands of professional lawyers and ensured fairer review procedures.

An important change permitted an enlisted person tried by a general court-martial to demand that one third of the court be composed of enlisted personnel. The uniform code defines the offenses for which a person under the jurisdiction of the armed forces may be subjected to court-martial. In addition to allowing punishments by the commanding officer, including confinement not to exceed one week, the code establishes three levels of court-martial. The summary court-martial consists of a single officer, and may impose a maximum penalty of imprisonment for one month. The special court-martial consists of at least three officers and may impose a prison sentence of up to six months. The general court-martial is composed of five members and one law officer who must be a trained lawyer admitted to practice before a state's highest court. The general court-martial may impose any authorized sentence including dishonorable discharge or death.

One of the principal differences between the procedure in court-martial and in criminal cases in civil courts is the absence of a jury. Cases are decided by a vote of two thirds or three fourths of the court, depending on the severity of the offense. For the death penalty, the vote must be unanimous. The accused is permitted to have counsel, to compel the attendance of witnesses, and to enjoy the usual protections of the law of evidence.

Bibliography

See W. B. Aycock and S. W. Wurfel, Military Law under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (1955, repr. 1973); R. O. Everett, Military Justice in the Armed Forces of the United States (1956); R. S. Rivkin, G.I. Rights and Army Justice (1970); W. E. Schug, United States Law and the Armed Forces (1972); J. W. Bishop, Jr., Justice under Fire (1974); R. H. Kohn, ed., Military Laws of the U.S. (1979).

The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia™ Copyright © 2022, Columbia University Press. Licensed from Columbia University Press. All rights reserved.
References in periodicals archive ?
Official sources said the court-martial proceedings began in Mumbai on July 26 based on findings of the board of inquiry which carried out a detailed investigation into the accident on December 5, 2016
'The headquarters 6 division has painstakingly selected credible officers with in-depth knowledge and outstanding experience of military law and duties as members of the court-martial to ensure fair hearing and justice.'
It is pertinent to mention here that Brigadier Rizwan Raja was retired from army in 2014 and later court-martial proceedings was initiated against him.
It may be added that in 1999 Col Munir was court-martialed for non-disclosure of assets, which was set aside by the LHC.
However, Winthrop's treatise was mostly about military law; it provided no practical guidance for the line officer tasked with prosecuting a court-martial or serving as a member at a general, garrison or regimental court.
During her court-martial, Sterling claimed that posting the signs was an exercise of her right to religious freedom, as guaranteed by the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), and so the order to remove the signs was unlawful.
Citing the twenty-first century as a different political universe for military personnel, where one can argue for the expansion of personal rights, thanks to a long series of reforms in the conduct of court martial (1916, 1920, 1948, 1950 1968, and 1983), Bray notes that no more do American soldiers, sailors, airmen, or marines have to worry that they will be shot by a firing squad in the immediate aftermath of a hurried court-martial conducted in the field.
Under the rules of a general court-martial, Bergdahl, who walked off his base in Afghanistan in 2009, could technically face up to life in prison.
of fact' differently from the court-martial." (26) As none of
court-martial; (2) special courtmartial; and (3) general court-martial.
The US Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces ousted the previous judge, Col Gregory Gross, saying he appeared biased against Hasan, and also threw out his order to have Hasan's beard forcibly shaved before his court-martial.
The ruling by the US Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces also made invalid an order from the judge, Colonel Gregory Gross, for Major Nidal Hasan to appear clean-shaven or for him to be forcibly shaved before his court-martial. Hasan, charged with the November 2009 shooting at Fort Hood, had argued that he had a right to keep his beard as an expression of his Muslim faith.