evolutionary sociology

evolutionary sociology

Any form of sociology which emphasizes continuities between biological evolution and sociocultural evolution. Notwithstanding the many excesses and oversimplifications of much previous EVOLUTIONARY THEORY in sociology, Runciman (1989), for example, suggests ‘that there is no escape from the recognition that any substantive social theory is and cannot but be evolutionary.’ What Runciman means by this is that:
  1. while in major part ‘extra organic’ (see also SUPERORGANIC, EMERGENT EVOLUTION), human social capacities are biologically based;
  2. though no simple pattern of UNILINEAR social development has occurred and prediction is out of the question (as is it also in relation to biological evolution), it remains possible to discuss social evolution in terms of a historical sequence of development (compare EVOLUTIONARY UNIVERSALS) in which later developments depend on those earlier; (c) in these circumstances, it makes sense to employ the concept of social 'S election’ (while at the same time specifying what the ‘advantage’ is) to explain why certain social practices have become established.

Not all sociologists would agree with Runciman's assessment, although many would (see also NEOEVOLUTIONISM, SOCIOCULTURAL EVOLUTION). If few would quarrel with (a) and (b) of Runciman's three points, the main source of disagreement is whether terms such as 'S election’ and ‘adaptation’, imported from biology can have any very precise content compared with their use in biology (see also FUNCTIONAL(IST) EXPLANATION). Some sociologists, notably GIDDENS and MANN recently, have also rejected any conception of ‘serial history’, proposing instead a purely EPISODIC CHARACTERIZATION of social change, presenting this as thus also a rejection of evolutionary (and functionalist) thinking. Yet, in practice, they too appear to find it difficult to escape evolutionary thinking in something like Runciman's broad terms (see Wright, 1983, Jary, 1991).

Issues often arise especially in the more particular claims for ‘adaptation’, functionally effective SOCIAL DIFFERENTIATION, etc, actually made by modern evolutionary sociologists (e.g. see MODERNIZATION). A further general issue is whether evaluative conceptions such as PROGRESS, have any place in modern evolutionary thinking. Evolutionary theorists are also divided on the issue of whether the general principle of‘evolution’ has any implications for the choice between ‘unplanned’ and gradual evolution (‘social mutations’) or planned development (see HISTORICISM sense 2 , RATIONALIZATION). Evolutionary sociology in its modern forms has moved a long way from the crude notions of SOCIAL DARWINISM (misapplied biological ANALOGIES, racist theories, and sweeping applications of such notions as the ‘survival of the fittest’) advanced in the 19th century, but it remains controversial. See also SPENCER, PARSONS, HABERMAS.

Collins Dictionary of Sociology, 3rd ed. © HarperCollins Publishers 2000
References in periodicals archive ?
evolutionary sociology was the projection onto all human history of the
Examples include early exchange theories of Homans and Blau, symbolic interactionist theories of identity, Herbert Spencer's contribution to evolutionary sociology, dramaturgical theories, actor-network theories, critical theories of the Frankfurt School and more.
Journal's use of evolutionary sociology in articles during
deployed evolutionary sociology thus offers a fresh perspective
In speaking of evolutionary sociology, what is meant is early
for evolutionary sociology in the discussion over Jewish culture.
evolutionary sociology, was particularly important for the construction
In "The Intellectualism of Charlotte Perkins Gilman: Evolutionary Perspectives on Race, Ethnicity, and Class," Lisa Ganobcsik-Wilhiams illustrates the extent to which Gilman rationalized her ethnocentrism or dressed her racism in the guise of "evolutionary sociology." Though Ganobcsik-Williams claims that Gilman "embraced and extended to the realm of human society the evolutionary biological theories that Charles Darwin and Alfred Wallace had made public in the 1850s" (18), such a statement is problematic.
The third stratum relates to evolutionary sociology at large, which deals with social entities other than organizations, whilst the fourth layer refers to evolutionary perspectives outside the domain of sociology, a prominent example being Richard Nelson and Sidney Winter's (1982) evolutionary economics.
Runciman of Trinity College, Cambridge, proposed the construction of evolutionary sociology to the Darwin Seminar?
Deftly defining evolutionary sociology by negations, Runciman insisted that he was advocating something quite different from social Darwinism, which, he maintained, was individualist, racist, a justification for imperialism, and reactionary.

Full browser ?