Kenyon, "A recalculation on the

gravitational mass difference between the K0 and K0 mesons," Physics Letters B, vol.

The analogous quantity in our nonperturbative simulation is proper separation to

gravitational mass, [d.sub.P]/m.

Other parameters of GSA like the gravitational variable G, the active

gravitational mass [M.sub.ai], the passive

gravitational mass [M.sub.pi], the inertial mass [M.sub.ii], and the acceleration [a.sub.d.sub.i] will be, respectively, computed by other equations.

where the symbols stand for: [MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION - Gravitational force, NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] G - Gravitational constant, [M.sub.A] - Active

gravitational mass, [M.sub.P] - Passive

gravitational mass, [M.sub.I] - Inertia

gravitational mass, R - Euclidean distance between masses [M.sub.A] and, [M.sub.P] [MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION - Acceleration value NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] of object 1.

This has physicists puzzled, but it could be explained if

gravitational mass was not the same as inertial mass, which is a paradigm in physics.

In RKD's case, the phenomenological law, showing the possible violation of the equivalence between inertial and

gravitational mass, was first searched for as well; then it was translated into its empirical relationship.

In this account, once we have made the interpretation of the causal transportation equations and then, coupled with the dynamical equation, we found the factor 1-[LAMBDA] + [DELTA]; the roll of this factor reduced the inertial energy density and effective

gravitational mass density that appears in the system.

for

gravitational masses shows that the total matter in galaxy clusters

In his recent comment [1], Crowell criticizes one of the experiments, suggested by us [2], which can demonstrate inequivalence between passive

gravitational mass of a composite quantum body and its energy.

Hence, the frequency change of a photon of frequency [v.sub.0] moving relative to a

gravitational mass is hv = h[v.sub.0] (1 - GM/r[c.sub.2]).

The notion of

gravitational mass of a composite body is known to be non-trivial in general relativity and related to the following paradoxes.

This raises the additional question whether full symmetry also requires the photon to have a positive or negative

gravitational mass, as given by