inductive inference


Also found in: Wikipedia.

inductive inference

References in periodicals archive ?
Since this problem was identified, there has been no shortage of proposals for how to incorporate analogy into inductive inference. Most alternatives to Camap's system, unlike his original one, have not been derived from first principles; this makes it to some extent unclear what the epistemic situations are to which they apply.
These results have been obtained based on the paradigm of Inductive Inference. This paper contains the results of an application of Support Vector Machines to text classification but now based on the paradigm of Transductive Inference.
It is argued that a model of cognitive semantic representations needs to address the property correlations and underlying conceptual theories in order to cover empirically supported cognitive phenomena of implicitly observing property correlations as an indirect basis for inductive inference. Current formal semantic representation models take into account these phenomena superficially at most.
Unlike deduction, there cannot be a finite, explicit series of logical steps associated with an inductive inference because these are always based on open-ended sets, such as extrapolating from past to future events, or from observed cases to unobserved cases.
Scientific inductive inference depends on the uniformity of nature, whereas many key events portrayed in the scriptures are purported deviations from uniformity due to special divine action.
The same considerations outlined in the last two paragraphs would, suitably modified, speak against beliefs justified by inductive inference from observed to unobserved cases.
This widely cited work argued for the importance in all scientific work of an approach that is essentially Francis Bacon's inductive inference, "familiar to every college student." (17) According to Platt.
Topics of the refereed papers include testing (including a t-test for scale mixture errors), multiple testing (including step down control of the false discovery proportion), philosophy (including using frequentist statistics as a theory of inductive inference and a new look at the problem of specification), transformation models and proportional hazards (including modeling inequality and spread in multiple regression), copulas and decoupling, regression trees (including tree models for designated experiments), competing risks, robustness, multiple stochastic processes, asymptotics and density estimation.
Along with an interesting biography of Popper, Miller examines three stages of critical rationalism (fallibilism, negativism, skepticism) and what the arguments achieve, falsifiability as more than a convention, applied science, authoritative and radical rationalism, absolute skepticism, uniformity in inductive inference, critical rationalism's debt to Tarski, beauty as a road to the truth, language dependence, paraconsistent logic, and final comments on make falsification bite.
Analogously, the basic task in justifying an inductive inference is to show that it conforms to the general rules of induction.
The sample used in an inductive inference is significantly different from the population for which the inference is intended.