Table 4 presents that t-value (2.81) is not significant (p = .48) at 0.05 level of significance
. Therefore it is proved that there is no significant difference between the perceptions of students with visual impairment and normal students on the basis of giftedness subscale of self-concept.
Experience had no significant difference with IR, LEST and AR [F (12, 629) = 2.170, p = .115], [F (12, 629) = .834, p = .435] and [F (12, 629) = .630, p = .533] at pa$?0.05 level of significance
in terms of experience.
The FE/ATA ratio of South Asian MFBs is slightly higher and the difference is significant at 10% level of significance
. This suggest the reliance of South Asian MFIs more on non-equity financing sources.
In the estimates of fixed effect model human development index, political institutions and investment are statistically significant at 5% level of significance
. The coefficients sign of human development index, political institutions and investment are positive in fix effect model.
Since p value is less than level of significance
(p < .05), so we can reject the null hypothesis accept the alternate hypothesis, i.e.
It is possible to conclude on the basis of calculation results in Table 4 that by the adopted level of significance
a=0,05, similarly as it previously happened, the only differences between mean values of GRTA and DR indicators are not statistically significant.
The table indicates that there is a significant difference on the status of ALS beneficiaries who did not proceed to college according to districts and school years as it has an x2 value of 14.633 and obtained a P-value of 0.001 at [alpha] 0.05 level of significance
It was found that treatment T6 having combination of two semiochemicals exhibited the higher level of significance
. The treatment with turmeric and b-pinene exhibited significantly low level of parasitism (T4).
To verify the level of Islamic bank performance based on the knowledge management practices; 3) To validate the relationship between the status and the level of significance
of knowledge management in relation with the bank performance.
Therefore, at the time of defining p = 0.05 as the level of significance
, there was no logical reason or evidence to support such a decision.
Table 3: Comparison between Academic Achievements CBSE Board male and male students CBSE Board CG Board Adolescents Adolescents (N=200) (N=200) Variable Mean SD Mean SD t value Mathematics 41.94 10.53 40.84 8.96 0.06505 achievement test * 0.05 level of significance
Table 4: Comparison between Academic Achievements of CBSE Board and CG Board students CBSE Board CG Board Adolescents Adolescents (N=200) (N=200) Variable Mean SD Mean SD t value Mathematics 42.05 10.49515 33.35 12.33688 2.0082 achievement test * 0.05 level of significance
Since the P- value (0.0001**) of the calculated (2) statistic value is less than than the level of significance