natural philosophy


Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Medical, Wikipedia.

natural philosophy

(now only used in Scottish universities) physical science, esp physics
Collins Discovery Encyclopedia, 1st edition © HarperCollins Publishers 2005
The following article is from The Great Soviet Encyclopedia (1979). It might be outdated or ideologically biased.

Natural Philosophy

 

the philosophy of nature; a speculative interpretation of nature viewed in its [nature’s] entirety. Throughout the history of philosophy, the distinction between natural science and natural philosophy (as well as the latter’s place in philosophy) has often changed.

The most important period of natural philosophy was in classical antiquity. Natural philosophy was the first historical form of philosophy. Ancient Greek natural philosophers advanced a number of hypotheses that played an important role in the history of science; the most important hypothesis was that of the atomists. Later, natural philosophy was usually referred to as physics or physiology, that is, teachings about nature. The term “natural philosophy” (philosophia naturalis) was introduced by the Stoics (Seneca).

During the Middle Ages, when philosophy sought to substantiate the geocentric theory of the universe, natural philosophy underwent a period of almost total decline. Individual elements of classical natural philosophy were adapted to creationistic ideas of Christian, Muslim, and Judaic theology.

The Renaissance philosophers’ awakened interest in nature led to a revival of natural philosophy, which was associated with G. Bruno, B. Telesio, T. Campanella, G. Cardano, Paracelsus, and F. Patrizi. The natural philosophy of the Renaissance was based on pantheism and hylozoism. The principle of the identical nature of the microcosmos and macrocosmos was particularly widespread. Renaissance natural philosophy advanced the principle of the integral study of nature as well as a number of profound dialectical theses, for example, the thesis of the struggle between opposing elements as a source of change. However, on the whole, the Renaissance natural philosophers’ understanding of nature was to a large extent fantastical and included astrological and alchemical concepts. Intense efforts to master the forces of nature led to an interest in magic, cabalism, and Pythagorean number-mysticism.

In the 17th and 18th centuries, during the era of the rapid progress of mechanistic natural science, when analytic methods and the metaphysical method of examining nature prevailed, natural philosophy declined in importance. In German classical philosophy, natural philosophy again emerged as one of the principal philosphical disciplines, particularly in the philosophy of F. W. J. von Schelling, who attempted to summarize the achievements of contemporary natural science from the standpoint of objective idealism. Schelling introduced the dialectical concept of polarity, which he defined as the principle of the differentiation of the primary unity of nature. He proposed that higher forms represent, in a manner of speaking, the raising of lower forms to a higher power. Schelling’s natural philosophy was continued by L. Oken (Germany) and D. M. Vellanskii (Russia), as well as by natural scientists, including the physicist H. C. Oersted, the geologist H. Steffens, the biologists G. Treviranus and C. G. Carus, and the psychologist G. Schubert.

Marx and Engels highly valued the importance of “old natural philosophy”; however, they demonstrated its historical limitations. Describing natural philosophy, Engels wrote that it put “in place of the real but as yet unknown interconnections ideal, fancied ones, filling in the missing facts by figments of the mind and bridging the actual gaps merely in imagination. In the course of this procedure, it conceived many brilliant ideas and foreshadowed many later discoveries, but it also produced a considerable amount of nonsense, which indeed could not have been otherwise. Today, when one needs to comprehend the results of natural scientific investigation only dialectically, that is, in the sense of their own interconnection, . . . natural philosophy is finally disposed of” (K. Marx and F. Engels, Soch., 2nd ed., vol. 21, pp. 304–05).

Attempts to revive natural philosophy were made in the late 19th and early 20th centuries by W. Ostwald, H. Driesch, T. Lipps, and others. These men sought to overcome, by means of natural philosophy, the crisis of modern natural science. Elements of idealistic natural philosophy are present in the theory of emergent evolution and in the philosophy of A. Whitehead.

Dialectical materialism, proceeding from the Leninist delineation of the philosophical concept of matter and its natural scientific investigation, denies the possibility of natural philosophy as a separate philosophical discipline which dominates and directs the progress of the natural sciences.

REFERENCES

Dingier, H. Geschichte der Naturphilosophie. Berlin, 1932.
Holländer, A. Vom Wesen der Natur: Einführung in die traditionelle Naturphilosophie. Vienna, 1948.
Bense, M. Der Begriff der Naturphilosophie. Stuttgart, 1953.
Naturphilosophie: Von der Spekulation zur Wissenschaft. Edited by H. Hörz, R. Lother, and S. Wollgast. Berlin, 1969.

V. V. SOKOLOV

The Great Soviet Encyclopedia, 3rd Edition (1970-1979). © 2010 The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
References in periodicals archive ?
Firstly, that Locke was committed to experimental natural philosophy and sceptical of the epistemic status of speculative systems.
Leibniz proposed metaphysical foundations for natural philosophy which did not rely on the geometrical or 'picturable' conception of body.
Kavey maintains that these little compendia of natural knowledge "made the inner workings of the natural world accessible to people who lacked access to academic natural philosophy." By imparting an understanding of the relationships among objects and by instructing readers in how to manipulate those natural relationships, the books of secrets gave readers a sense of confidence that they could control nature.
These claims on behalf of experimental natural philosophy have three significant implications.
If trends in Greek natural philosophy helped produce an environment favorable to the growth of Christianity in the Hellenistic world, there was a second influence from the East that was every bit as important and closely linked to scientific pursuits.
To these contextual elements must be added substantive ones, that is, developments within the body of inherited Greco-Arabic science and within Western European natural philosophy that raised many of the questions about the natural world, which continued to stimulate thought into the seventeenth century and beyond it.
In any study of Aristotle's natural philosophy, the text of Aristotle's Physics itself clearly occupies a central place, but texts such as this paraphrase can serve to further the discussion of natural philosophy in the Aristotelian tradition.
Depicting empirical research as virtuous in both methodology and result--the former improves moral habits, the latter charitably eases "man's estate" (24)--apologists helped reshape "social perceptions of utility" (34) and legitimize natural philosophy. In the next chapter, Anne Sutherland examines the "allegorical and empirical dimensions" (37) of the astronomical allusions in The Winter's Tale.
Thomas Hobbes and the Politics of Natural Philosophy.
of London, UK) note in their introduction, Hooke was "a polymath who made seminal contributions to many fields, from natural philosophy and technology to architecture and civic design." Reflecting the growing scholarly interest in Hooke, this collection presents 16 papers exploring Hooke's scientific activities across a range of fields.
Partly it is because many Renaissance humanists for their part were indifferent to or even opposed the scholastic natural philosophy and medicine of their time.
His major work in mechanics--Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica (Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy)--appeared in 1687 [see "Newton's Principia in Western History," The World & I, July 1987, p.