nebular hypothesis


Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Wikipedia.

nebular hypothesis:

see solar systemsolar system,
the sun and the surrounding planets, natural satellites, dwarf planets, asteroids, meteoroids, and comets that are bound by its gravity. The sun is by far the most massive part of the solar system, containing almost 99.9% of the system's total mass.
..... Click the link for more information.
.
The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia™ Copyright © 2013, Columbia University Press. Licensed from Columbia University Press. All rights reserved. www.cc.columbia.edu/cu/cup/

nebular hypothesis

(neb -yŭ-ler) A theory for the origin of the Solar System put forward by the French mathematician Pierre-Simon de Laplace in 1796 and similar to a suggestion of the philosopher Immanuel Kant in 1755. It was proposed that the Solar System formed from a great rotating cloud, or nebula, of material (gas and dust) collapsing under its own gravitational attraction. An interaction of forces caused the cloud to form a rotating flattened disk, called the solar nebula. To conserve angular momentum, the disk rotated more rapidly as the contraction progressed. Laplace suggested that rings of material became detached from the spinning disk when the velocity at its edge exceeded a critical value, and that the material in these rings later coalesced to form the planets. The central product of the contraction is the Sun, while the planetary satellites may have formed from further rings shed by the condensing planets.

The hypothesis, popular throughout the 19th century, went out of favor. The main problem was that it indicated that the Sun should still be spinning on the verge of rotational instability; it could not explain why the Sun has almost 99.9% of the mass of the Solar System but only about 2% of the total angular momentum. In addition, calculations showed that the rings would not condense to form planets. However, in a modified form, it is the basis of most modern ideas for the formation of the Sun and planets. See Solar System, origin. Compare encounter theories.

Collins Dictionary of Astronomy © Market House Books Ltd, 2006
The following article is from The Great Soviet Encyclopedia (1979). It might be outdated or ideologically biased.

Nebular Hypothesis

 

a cosmogonical hypothesis which assumes that the solar system (and celestial bodies in general) was formed out of a rarefied nebula. The term “nebular hypothesis” originated in the 19th century in connection with the Laplace nebular hypothesis. Later, the term was also used in Kant’s hypothesis and in other theories that assumed the formation of celestial bodies from nebulae of gas or dust. The term “nebular hypothesis” is not usually used in relation to modern cosmogonical hypotheses. (SeeCOSMOGONY.)

The Great Soviet Encyclopedia, 3rd Edition (1970-1979). © 2010 The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.

nebular hypothesis

[′neb·yə·lər hī′päth·ə·səs]
(astrophysics)
A theory, proposed in 1796 by Laplace, supposing that the planets originated from the solar nebula surrounding the proto-sun; as the sun cooled, it contracted, rotated faster, and thus caused a ringlike bulging at the equator; this bulge eventually broke off and formed the planets; Laplace further theorized that the sun and other stars formed from clouds of nebulous matter; the theory in this form is not accepted.
McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Scientific & Technical Terms, 6E, Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
References in periodicals archive ?
As for Laplace's nebular hypothesis, it was never specific to a particular solar phase (gas, liquid, or solid).
He even accused Spencer with making the Nebular hypothesis the starting point of his discussion, justifying the same behavior by men like Kirchhoff and Faye as merely supportive and confirmatory [106, p.
Spencer advanced this model in an unsigned popular work entitled Recent Astronomy and the Nebular Hypothesis published in the Westminster Review in 1858 [104].
Faye, which you have described in your numbers for January 28 and February 4, is to a considerable extent coincident with one which I ventured to suggest in an article on 'Recent Astronomy and the Nebular Hypothesis' published in the Westminster Review for July, 1858.
The most widely accepted cosmological model for a universe in flux was "the nebular hypothesis," a name invented by Whewell for a hypothesis first proposed by Immanuel Kant, and then developed by Pierre-Simon de Laplace and William Herschel.
The nebular hypothesis was the subject of heated controversy on three levels: first, there was the nature of the evidence itself; second, the question of what that evidence did or did not prove; and third, what it would mean if the hypothesis turned out to be accurate.
Tennyson's five specific references to the nebular hypothesis reflect the ambiguities surrounding the theory.