Neo-Darwinism

(redirected from neo-Darwinian)
Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Medical, Wikipedia.

Neo-Darwinism

 

an evolutionary doctrine proposed by A. Weismann in the 1880’s and 1890’s, during the initial period of the formulation of genetic science.

Neo-Darwinism is based on two hypotheses: the continuity of the germ plasm and germ selection. The first hypothesis states that there exists a continuous, potentially “immortal” germ plasm that is modified primarily as a result of the combination of parental germ cells. Germ selection extends the principle of natural selection to hypothetical heriditary units, called determinants, within the germ cells. New life forms arise by virtue of the selection of determinants. It is postulated that the uneven distribution of determinants in the offsprings’ germ cells is suggestive of the determinants’ having emerged from a struggle within the parents’ germ cells. Darwinian natural selection is viewed as a check on unfit forms that arise in the process of germ selection.

Correct in its rejection of the inheritance of acquired traits, neo-Darwinism emphasizes the mosaicism of an organism’s tissues and the independent nature of the occurrence of modifications in individual traits over the course of evolution. Weismann’s ideas on the inertness, conservation, and fragmentation of hereditary matter, and on the role of independent hereditary units in the determination of individual traits were subsequently proved to be fruitful working hypotheses that eventually were developed in the science of modern genetics. However, Weismann’s view, an attempt to both link the findings of the new science of genetics with the older theories of evolution and to supplement Darwin’s idea of natural selection, turned out to be for the most part erroneous.

The term “modern Darwinism,” that is, a synthesis of population genetics and classical Darwinism, is sometimes used interchangeably with “neo-Darwinism.” This is a misuse of terms that is unfortunate and incorrect from a historical point of view.

REFERENCES

Wallace, A. R. Darvinizm: Izlozhenie teorii estestvennogo podbora, 2nd ed. Moscow, 1911. (Translated from English.)
Weismann, A. Lektsii po evoliutsionnoi teorii. St. Petersburg, 1918. (Translated from German.)
Shmal’gauzen, I. I. Problemy darvinizma, 2nd ed. Leningrad, 1969.

A. V. IABLOKOV

Mentioned in ?
References in periodicals archive ?
The neo-Darwinian theory presents evolution as a non-teleological process(39); changes in organisms occur, not for some purpose, but as a consequence of genetic changes and interactions with the environment.
For many Christians, strongly attracted to the Genesis creation story taken in a literal sense, neo-Darwinian theory threatens religious truth and morality.
It is the point of this paper to apply certain more recent developments from the logico-mathematical variety of theoretical semiotics (a generalized variety of Peirce's method) to neo-Darwinian theory.
The danger, though, is that the "anti" position may become so congenial for liberals that they ignore the almost universal acceptance of neo-Darwinian or sociobiological theory among researchers in natural history and animal behavior and among many psychologists and social scientists.
The mass of data from many fields, including evo devo and epigenetic control of genome function, has left the neo-Darwinian paradigm open to reinterpretation.
In particular, it maintains that Darwinian and Neo-Darwinian explanations of the history of life are correct.
They contrast their results with another evolutionary simulation program, Avida, which leads to production of genetic information by the neo-Darwinian mechanism of mutation and natural selection.
can be explained ultimately in purely natural terms, where today this usually means in evolutionary, specifically neo-Darwinian, terms.
Both books argue for the compatibility of standard neo-Darwinian evolution and traditional Christian faith.
In that article he called into question the compatibility of neo-Darwinian theory of evolution with the Catholic teaching that the created order is endowed with purpose by God its creator.
Part II, "How to Build an Animal," consists of seven chapters treating the role of genes in organismal development, and why Meyer and others are not impressed with classical neo-Darwinian mechanisms as potential explanations for the origin of the Cambrian body plans.