(redirected from noumena)
Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus.


(no͞o`mənŏn'), in the philosophical system of Immanuel KantKant, Immanuel
, 1724–1804, German metaphysician, one of the greatest figures in philosophy, b. Königsberg (now Kaliningrad, Russia). Early Life and Works
..... Click the link for more information.
, a "thing-in-itself"; it is opposed to phenomenonphenomenon,
an observable fact or event; in philosophy the definitions and uses of the term have varied. In the philosophy of Aristotle phenomena were the objects of the senses (e.g., sights and sounds), as opposed to the real objects understood by the mind.
..... Click the link for more information.
, the thing that appears to us. Noumena are the basic realities behind all sensory experience. According to Kant, they are not knowable because they cannot be perceived, but they must be thinkable because moral decision making and scientific investigation cannot proceed without the assumption that they exist.



a term widely used in medieval and modern philosophy to signify something that can be perceived by the mind, unlike the phenomenon, which is given in experience and is perceived through the senses.

References in periodicals archive ?
The installation is meant to be thought-provoking, showing that machines may not live in a gleaming Matrix-like world, but rather 'a natural landscape robotically manipulated,' Noumena explains.
36) Kant, having conceded that things-in-themselves can be designated only by negation, is indeed bound to say of noumena that we cannot know their features; but he errs, I think, in claiming to know how the world appears to all humans.
Such a datum would correspond to Whorf's "kaleidoscopic flux of impressions" and would be that part of noumena which, because of both the capacity and the limitations of man's sensory apparatus, incapable of evoking a response.
The controversy between Plato and Aristotle on noumena and phenomena is fundamentally due to an imprecise epistemology regarding the distinction between positive and normative aspects of a natural and social 'concept.
Anyway, Fichte, that had in his mind the unsolved Kantian issue of the noumena (thinkable but not knowable), tries to solve Kantian dualism highlighting the self-consciousness of the Ego, expressed by the well-known principle of identity A=A.
Yet the phrase "whether it existed before or not" insinuates that Keats does not entirely share the Kantian dualism of phenomena and noumena, according to which ultimately noumena cannot be known and thus remain separate from phenomena.
In Being and Nothingness Sartre argues that there are no ideas or noumena comprehending a true reality behind the world of experience which are supposed to be the only object of knowledge (Plato) or which are strictly distinguished from our sensory perceptions of things (Kant).
In 'Problems with Freedom: Kant's Argument in Groundwork III and its Subsequent Emendation' (Chapter 10), Guyer reads Kant as trying to prove that we are free qua noumena, and as invoking transcendental idealism to make a positive, metaphysical assertion about the noumenal self.
In the first Critique, merely acknowledging that we cannot access things-in-themselves is enough: the negative, limiting concept of noumena (things in themselves) carries with it a "minimal, quasi-sujective endorsement" of the limits of our cognitive structures that "completes our obligation to accept the given world" (75).
Para el, "la posibilidad de tales noumena es bastante incomprensible, y esta mas alla de la esfera de los fenomenos, todo es para nosotros un mero vacio" (52).
Scotus's initial move is anything but an arcane curiosity from the distant past because it led through an unanticipated series of intellectual developments that include the scientific revolution, Isaac Newton's physics and post-Newtonian deism, Immanuel Kant's metaphysics and his sharp distinction between phenomena and noumena, the philosophical framework of nineteenth-century liberal Protestantism, and eventually the neo-Darwinian, scientistic atheism of the New Atheists.
What I'm driving at is how fragmentary and elusive the noumena and phenomena on which we draw for writing actually are.