patriarchy


Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Wikipedia.

patriarchy:

see matriarchymatriarchy,
familial and political rule by women. Many contemporary anthropologists reject the claims of J. J. Bachofen and Lewis Morgan that early societies were matriarchal, although some contemporary feminist theory has suggested that a primitive matriarchy did indeed exist
..... Click the link for more information.
.

patriarchy

  1. a form of social organization in which a male (the patriarch) acts as head of the family/household, holding power over females and children (e.g. in Roman society).
  2. any system whereby men achieve and maintain social, cultural and economic dominance over females and younger males. The term may refer to a pattern of organization within the family and households, etc., or within a whole society.
Although historically sociologists have mainly used the term descriptively, more recent usage by feminist sociologists has emphasized mainly its negative features. Analysis in sociology has been concerned with the origins and the implications of patriarchy. Although biological differences between men and women (e.g. physical strength in warfare) have sometimes been seen as the basis of patriarchy, the cultural and social sources of patriarchy, and its variations in form and importance, are equally striking.

Within FEMINIST THEORY, use of the term patriarchy has lead to the politicization of discussion of GENDER relations, enabling gender relations to be understood as predicated on inequalities of power.

Patriarchy

 

the most widespread form of primitive communal relations during the period of their breakdown. The patriarchy is characterized by the dominant role of men in the economy, society, and family.

The transition to patriarchy took place during a period of significant development in the productive forces and an increase in labor productivity in all aspects of the primitive communal economy: agriculture, cattle raising, hunting, and fishing. The development of production caused the growth of exchange and the rise of private property. Almost everywhere men replaced women in the sphere of basic production and confined them primarily to domestic labor. The patriarchy is also characterized by patrilinear inheritance. The kinship group loses its economic unity but retains other elements of kinship. In addition, the patriarchy is marked by the transition from pairing marriage to monogamy, the settling of the wife in the husband’s communal group (patrilocal marriage), and the formation of large patriarchal families. Patriarchal relations were further strengthened with the growth of property differentiation, the emergence of patriarchal slavery, and the rise of class divisions.

The question of the place of the patriarchy in the history of society has been discussed for many centuries. One widely held theory claimed that human society had always been patriarchal. The ancient Greek philosophers Plato and Aristotle supported this theory, which dominated medieval thought on the history of society. In the 19th century it was advocated by H. Maine. In the 1860’s and 1870’s J. Bachofen and later L. H. Morgan refuted the idea of the primordial character of the patriarchy. Key features of Morgan’s views were supported and developed by F. Engels, and they have been accepted by most Soviet scholars. But even in the 20th century a significant number of bourgeois ethnologists adhere to the theory of the primordial character of the patriarchy.

REFERENCES

Engels, F. Proiskhozhdenie sem’i, chastnoi sobstvennosti i gosudarstva. In K. Marx and F. Engels, Soch., 2nd ed., vol. 21.
Morgan, L. H. Drevnee obshchestvo. Leningrad, 1934. [Translated from English.]
Kosven, M. O. “Perekhod ot matriarkhata k patriarkhatu.” Tr. ln-ta etnografii, vol. 14. Moscow, 1951.
Problemy etnografii i antropologii v svete nauchnogo naslediia F. Engel’sa. Moscow, 1972.

L. A. FAINBERG

References in periodicals archive ?
In my Introduction to Women's and Gender Studies classes I use her arguments about the different forms of companionate patriarchy which were in conflict in 19th-century Montreal to illustrate for first-year undergraduates just how complex patriarchy is and how it is always historically specific.
She has also written that piercing and tattooing are unfeminist, a product of self-hatred under patriarchy.
A large number of the proposed and/or implemented measures aimed against patriarchy are violations of libertarian ethics: affirmative action, subsidization of birth control, pornography bans, and restrictions on "hate speech" all come to mind.
What remains, then, is a careful examination of personal and feminist/womanist landscapes to get at some "truths" of patriarchy and its detrimental effects.
Organizing her analysis around patriarchy and its methods for maintaining and distributing power, Pubols brings a fresh perspective to many well-worn scholarly trails.
Ivone Gebara of Brazil concludes that critical analyses of patriarchy led by European and North American feminist theologians have not brought about institutional change.
Yet later in her article, Vint argues, "It is not Ernst as an individual whom Irene must kill, but Ernst as a symbol of the continued influence of patriarchy in Irene's thoughts" (91).
Anne Marie, the tenderness of your smile will be the light that will encourage Haitian women to arise from the rubble of the patriarchy.
Throughout her study, O'Connor continually contrasts two competing systems of patriarchy in nineteenth-century Ecuador: one linked to the country's white-mestizo society and another associated with Indian communities.
Maronite Patriarch, Cardinal Nasrallah Boutros Sfeir, headed Sunday mass at Bkerki Patriarchy.
This article discusses the way in which the power of religion and culture perpetuates the hegemony of patriarchy.
According to Judith Bennett, in her recent work History Matters, patriarchy is the "central problem" of women's history, and even "one of the greatest general problems of all history.