pragmatics


Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Medical, Wikipedia.
Related to pragmatics: Discourse analysis

pragmatics

[prag′mad·iks]
(communications)
The branch of semiotics that treats the relation of symbols to behavior and the meaning received by the listener or reader of a statement.
(computer science)
The fourth and final phase of natural language processing, following contextual analysis, that takes into account the speaker's goal in uttering a particular thought in a particular way in determining what constitutes an appropriate response.
McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Scientific & Technical Terms, 6E, Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

pragmatics

the subdivision of LINGUISTICS concerned with the use of language in context. Pragmatics seeks to describe the systematic variation in the selection and production of linguistic items arising from the social environment. It is thus the most complex proposed ‘level’ of language study and the one about which fundamental disagreements exist. It is not settled whether it can be a systematic study, perhaps focusing on permissible or favoured sequences of speech and action in systematically represented contexts, or whether it is a catch-all category for all those aspects of meaning, largely particular, which fall outside SEMANTICS. Influential approaches include SPEECH ACT theory, which, following Austin and Searle, seeks to specify the rules for ‘bringing-off actions in speech (e.g. promising) and ethnomethodological CONVERSATION ANALYSIS, which, with its detailed evidence of preferred sequences, can make a serious claim to being the first successful empirical pragmatics.
Collins Dictionary of Sociology, 3rd ed. © HarperCollins Publishers 2000
The following article is from The Great Soviet Encyclopedia (1979). It might be outdated or ideologically biased.

Pragmatics

 

a branch—more precisely, an aspect—of semi-otic that investigates and studies the relation between a given system of signs and the system’s interpreters and users. The fundamental ideas of pragmatics were formulated by C. Peirce. Substantial contributions were made by C. Morris, who also invented the term “pragmatics,” and a number of other scholars.

Pragmatics is distinguished from syntactics and semantics. Syntactics studies the purely structural relations between correctly constructed expressions in a sign system, without regard for the expressions’ possible interpretations (even though the interpretations may be kept in mind). Semantics focuses precisely upon these interpretations. Pragmatics studies the characteristics and relations of a given sign system through the unexpressed means and resources of this same system. These resources include the stylistic characteristics of a language that ensure the most adequate reception of messages, the degree to which a text can be condensed without losing its comprehensibility, the criteria for the optimal structure of such a condensed text, and the interpreters’ individual capacities for “solutions.” Thus, pragmatics proposes to take maximum account of the characteristics and capacities of the human intellect and in turn claims to reveal the conditions that ensure success in creating models of these characteristics and capacities.

In more concrete terms, one can mention the trends and scientific research in which the application of the concepts and ideas of pragmatics is extremely promising and often leads to direct practical results. This includes problems of heuristic programming, machine translation and the very difficult task of automatic recognition of homonymy, automatic (machine) abstracting, and the development of information-retrieval systems and specialized languages. It also includes the development of languages for outer-space communications—Lincos, the lingua cosmica of the Dutch mathematician H. Freudenthal—and the whole range of problems connected with planning and constructing any kind of robot. These are tasks for which the resources of the concrete sciences and syntactic and semantic considerations alone are clearly insufficient. The ideas of pragmatics are also widely applied in “speculative” areas, such as the development of mathematical principles and mathematical logic; examples are seen in works by the Dutch mathematician G. Mannoury and in ultraintuitionism. At the same time, pragmatics makes wide use of material gleaned from the data of psychology (especially engineering psychology), ethology (the science of animal behavior), social psychology, linguistics, and other sciences; these sciences are, in turn, influenced by pragmatics.

REFERENCES

Carnap, R. Znachenie i neobkhodimost’. Moscow, 1959. (Translated from English.)
Logika i metodologiia nauki: IV Vses. simpozium, Kiev, iiun’ 1965. Moscow, 1967. Pages 56–67. (Translated from English.)
Vychislitel’nye mashiny i myshlenie. Moscow, 1967. (Translated from English.)
Integral’nye roboty. Moscow, 1973. (Collection of articles translated from English.)
Nilsson, N. Iskusstvennyi intellekt. Moscow, 1973. (Translated from English.)
Ajdukiewicz, K. Logika pragmatyczna. Warsaw, 1965.
Morris, C. W. Foundations of the Theory of Signs. Chicago, 1938.
Russell, B. An Inquiry Into Meaning and Truth. New York [1940].
Martin, R. M. Toward a Systematic Pragmatics. Amsterdam, 1959.
Peirce, C. S. Collected Papers, 2nd ed., vols. 5–6. Cambridge, Mass., 1960.
The Great Soviet Encyclopedia, 3rd Edition (1970-1979). © 2010 The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
References in periodicals archive ?
The knowledge of pragmatics can empower the instructors with the relevant cultural, social, professional perspectives.
Significance of Explicit Knowledge of Pragmatics in Business
The vice chancellor of Yusuf Maitama Sule University, Kano, Professor Mustapha Ahmad Isa, who gave the plenary lecture on the topic 'Pragmatics: the Expanding Frontiers,' charged NPrA to be an association that supports scholarly research in both theoretical and applied pragmatics in general, but with specific focus on the various sub-fields that have emerged over time, including the linguistic, cognitive, historical, social, inter-cultural and inter-language paradigms of pragmatics.
To summarize, in this section we have presented the most relevant research on pragmatics teaching and assessment and also the investigation gaps in the field.
In fact, the context-dependence of meaning is addressed by semantics without contributions from pragmatics: more precisely, without recourse to communicative intentions and the contribution of the context (in the broad sense).
Unlike traditional books on semantics and pragmatics, the present work treats reference as an indisputably pragmatic mechanism (74-76), crucially dependent on the speaker's and hearer's shared knowledge.
When discussing pragmatics, the simple and concise definition of Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig, one of the foremost scholars in the field of L2 pragmatics, undoubtedly proves useful: pragmatics is, "[...] the study of how-to-say-what-to-whom-when and that L2 pragmatics is the study of how learners come to know howto-say-what-to-whom-when" (2013, 68-69).
The description of the course in this article was an attempt to demonstrate how theoretical knowledge about formulaic language and pragmatics can be used to inform lesson or course design as well as strengthen the efficacy of instruction in these two areas.
Her research interests include interlanguage pragmatics, second language acquisition, intercultural competence, the study abroad context, and psychological and sociocultural adaptation by study abroad learners.
The visual pragmatics of code-switching in Late Middle English literature.
The students in the experimental group took two indigenous poems through pragmatics stylistics.