ranking method

ranking method

[′raŋk·iŋ ‚meth·əd]
(industrial engineering)
A system of job evaluation wherein each job as a whole is given a rank with respect to all the other jobs, and no attempt is made to establish a measure of value.
Mentioned in ?
References in periodicals archive ?
The m*n*3 binary variables are then sorted by the potential to control for confounding based on the bias ranking method (Bross 1966; Schneeweiss et al.
Nine indicators were used in this QS regional ranking method, with the following weights of the total score: academic reputation (30%), employer reputation (20%), faculty-student ratio (20%), web impact (10%), papers per faculty (5%), citations per paper (5%), percent of faculty with PhD (5%), percent of international faculty (2.
By adopting tm in rule based ER-Algorithm in conjunction with clustering method (k- means clustering) and ranking method (weighted page rank algorithm) to make efficient web searching process.
28] presented value and ambiguity index based ranking method of single-valued trapezoidal neutrosophic numbers and its application to MADM.
A ranking method like this fails to consider the dynamic nature of our operational environment, unit cultures, individual personalities, or specific situations.
Summing up, the objective of our paper consists of developing an accounting-based framework for systematical analyses of university rankings and, on that basis, analyzing the CHE's research ranking method for German BuSs.
To overcome this deficiency, Zheng and Lianguang (2013) propose a super-efficiency model, based on the super-efficiency ranking method of Andersen and Petersen (1993).
The node ranking method is the key problem in the greedy node mapping.
Fuzzy data envelopment analysis (DEA): model and ranking method, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 223(2): 872-878.
The fundamental insight highlighted in this paper is that such a ranking method (based on DBT data only) would also allow ranking the predictive accuracy of inverse models identified from the corresponding short-term data time periods.
We decided on 10 priorities to develop further based on this convergence and the distribution of responses; with 10 priorities, the five most highly ranked topics using each ranking method and all four clinical topics were included, and there was a notable gap in each ranking method between the lowest ranked topic included and the highest ranked topic not included in terms of the percentages.