Kenyon, "A recalculation on the
gravitational mass difference between the K0 and K0 mesons," Physics Letters B, vol.
The analogous quantity in our nonperturbative simulation is proper separation to
gravitational mass, [d.sub.P]/m.
where the symbols stand for: [MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION - Gravitational force, NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] G - Gravitational constant, [M.sub.A] - Active
gravitational mass, [M.sub.P] - Passive
gravitational mass, [M.sub.I] - Inertia
gravitational mass, R - Euclidean distance between masses [M.sub.A] and, [M.sub.P] [MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION - Acceleration value NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] of object 1.
This has physicists puzzled, but it could be explained if
gravitational mass was not the same as inertial mass, which is a paradigm in physics.
In RKD's case, the phenomenological law, showing the possible violation of the equivalence between inertial and
gravitational mass, was first searched for as well; then it was translated into its empirical relationship.
In this account, once we have made the interpretation of the causal transportation equations and then, coupled with the dynamical equation, we found the factor 1-[LAMBDA] + [DELTA]; the roll of this factor reduced the inertial energy density and effective
gravitational mass density that appears in the system.
for
gravitational masses shows that the total matter in galaxy clusters
In his recent comment [1], Crowell criticizes one of the experiments, suggested by us [2], which can demonstrate inequivalence between passive
gravitational mass of a composite quantum body and its energy.
Hence, the frequency change of a photon of frequency [v.sub.0] moving relative to a
gravitational mass is hv = h[v.sub.0] (1 - GM/r[c.sub.2]).
The notion of
gravitational mass of a composite body is known to be non-trivial in general relativity and related to the following paradoxes.
This raises the additional question whether full symmetry also requires the photon to have a positive or negative
gravitational mass, as given by