My favourite (and almost certainly false) story regarding Pythagoras is that of the student who attracted his ire by proving the existence of
irrational numbers. Enraged - as, allegedly, one of his core beliefs was that all numbers could be represented as a perfect ratio - Pythagoras drowned his follower to keep the story from spreading.
Considering the existence of two complementary fractals on the sets of rational and
irrational numbers accordingly [17], the probability that small variations (fluctuations) lead to coincidences between irrational and rational numbers of small quotients is minimum.
For a given continuous F : T [right arrow] T, Theorem 4 and its corollary shed no light on how to determine which
irrational numbers can be realized by rotational subsystems of (T,F).
(1) Regardless of the fact that the determined bit of the test data is 0 or 1, it has a little effect on compression ratio in the process of finding the
irrational number. (2) Do not-care bit can accelerate the search speed of
irrational number, reduce the value of
irrational number used to store the test data, and improve the compression ratio.
Niven:
Irrational Numbers, MAA, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1956.
The irrationality of [pi] was not proved until 1761 by Johann Lambert (1728-77), then in 1882 Ferdinand Lindemann (1852-1939) proved that [pi] was a non-algebraic
irrational number, a transcendental number (one which is not a solution of an algebraic equation, of any degree, with rational coefficients).
It is usually simply stated the real numbers are comprised of rational and
irrational numbers. It is very common to start from such a generality.
The digits of the
irrational number pi (3.1415926535897932384626 ...) not only go on forever but behave statistically like a sequence of random numbers uniformly distributed on 0,1, ...,9; no matter how long it may be, any finite subsequence of digits will appear an infinite number of times.
In contrast, Pi is like s, what mathematicians call an "
irrational number," that is, 3.14 if rounded off, but with endlessly unfolding decimal places if carried out.
In terms closer to everyday language, it asks the following question: can one speak of the existence of an
irrational number, for instance, a number familiar to each one of us, known as the "square root of 2"?
The infinite binary sequences generated here by an
irrational number still have MP.